This paper examines the principle of limited government as defined by the U.S. Constitution, focusing on key amendments that restrict government interference in citizens' lives. It covers Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, constitutional freedoms of expression, association, and religion, and the ongoing debate over church-state separation. The paper also discusses the Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship clause, due process protections, and the doctrine of selective incorporation, explaining how these provisions work together to guarantee equal rights and constitutional protections to all persons within the United States.
The concept of limited government holds that the government should not interfere with the daily activities of its citizens except to the bare minimum necessary. In the United States, this principle is embedded in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution. The areas in which government power is constitutionally limited include protection from government intrusion, unreasonable seizure, interference with expression, interference with association, and freedom of religion.
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights and protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. It also provides that a judicially sanctioned warrant must be obtained before conducting a search or effecting a seizure, accompanied by reasonable cause. The search and arrest are confined in scope to the information provided to the court issuing the warrant — normally submitted by a government officer who must swear to its accuracy and is thereby held accountable to that court. However, these protections do not apply when the person being searched has no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Unreasonable government seizure is also addressed in the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits the unreasonable seizure of an individual, their home, or their personal property without a warrant. It also proscribes the seizure of persons, which can include brief detentions. However, a seizure does not occur merely because police officers question someone in a public place or when that person's freedom of movement is not restricted (Samuel Dash, 2004). An individual who refuses to answer questions or to listen to officers cannot be seized solely on that basis. Police officers must have reasonable and objectively justifiable grounds for any seizure.
The right of expression is embedded in the Constitution, entitling every American to free expression without fear of intimidation. The government is prohibited from directly interfering with this right.
All Americans are entitled to free association and assembly, so long as they remain within the law. This is a fundamental right that the government cannot deny any person or group, provided the assembly and association do not disturb the peace of others or violate the law.
Freedom of religion is another area in which the American government cannot interfere, since every person has the freedom to choose their own religion. There is a clear separation between the state and religion, making it impossible for the state to interfere with any religion unless the government has profound reasons to believe that the religion is infringing upon the fundamental rights of others.
"Debate over prayer and religion in public schools"
The Fourteenth Amendment deals with American citizenship and the legal protection of all persons within the United States. Its original intent was to provide a foundation for people who came to America, granting equal rights and equal protection under the law to every individual within the country, regardless of citizenship status. This is reflected in the text: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside" (Fred Elbel, 2010).
Today, the Fourteenth Amendment is used to extend recognition to legal immigrants who come to America through amnesty, green card programs, student visas, work visas, and other lawful channels. However, it is worth noting that the amendment is at times exploited by illegal immigrants, some of whom take advantage of the fact that extended presence on U.S. soil — or even birth on U.S. territory — can confer citizenship rights regardless of immigration status. There have been documented cases of individuals crossing the border specifically to give birth in the United States in order to secure citizenship for their children (Wooldridge, F., 2011).
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1 — also known as the Citizenship Clause — states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." This provision was intended to grant citizenship and, by extension, entitlement to all the rights and protections the government provides, on an equal basis to all Americans regardless of how they obtained citizenship.
"Due process clause and binding states to the Bill of Rights"
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.