This paper analyzes the continued relevance of Uustal's "Values Clarification in Nursing: Application to Practice," focusing on how the seven-step values clarification process helps nurses understand the relationship between personal values and professional actions. The paper emphasizes three key insights: that values must generate action to be meaningful, that values are mutable and responsive to experience and context, and that a systematic process for evaluating alternatives and consequences provides nurses with an ethical framework for decision-making. Despite being written decades ago, Uustal's approach remains applicable to contemporary nursing because it enables practitioners to continuously assess and refine the values that guide their patient care.
There is still a great degree of relevance found in Uustal's "Values Clarification in Nursing: Application to Practice," despite the fact that it was written some time ago. This relevance pertains to the nursing profession and to both the theoretical and practical components of performing this work. Specifically, the article's approach to the correlation between a nurse's values and his or her actions is of extreme importance today, just as much as—if not more so than—when the article was first published. In this respect, the author truly gets to the essence of what impacts how nurses administer treatment and interact with patients overall, explaining it to the reader in a way that is both lucid and informative.
The crux of the article is the notion of values clarification, a seven-step process the author advocates to help clarify the parameters pertaining to values. These parameters are extremely relevant to nursing in contemporary times because they help clarify the concept of values and distinguish fully formed ones from those that are not. One of the most important aspects of this clarification is the recognition that ultimately, values are ideas which engender action. If one simply has a series of beliefs or convictions and they do not influence one's actions, then they are not values.
Uustal makes the point that values are not merely tenets upon which people base their actions; they are also reusable in the sense that one can repeatedly make the same decisions and create the same actions through careful consideration of one's values. This understanding transforms values from abstract philosophical concepts into practical guides for professional behavior, making them directly applicable to clinical decision-making in healthcare settings.
Another vital aspect of this document—which actually enables it to have continuing relevance several decades after it was written—is its framing of the mutability of values. The author denotes in multiple places that values are not rigid or static. Instead, they are continually changing in response to actions, events, experiences, trends, and the general cultural context in which they are formed. This part of the article means that the values for nursing that were espoused and practiced when the author composed this work may have changed in contemporary times. In fact, it implies that they must have changed, since values are formed and utilized in response to one's surroundings and the factors that are most important.
The practical application of this concept today is that nurses should not become complacent in their values. They should continually evaluate them to determine if they still apply, and in what ways their values can truly inform their practice. This ongoing reflection ensures that nursing practice remains responsive to evolving patient needs and ethical standards.
Given this extremely salient point by the author, another practical way in which her article continues to have relevance today is that she actually provides a blueprint for the evaluation of values which anyone can utilize. Of the seven-step process provided for evaluating values, understanding how nurses approach this systematic assessment is crucial for professional development. The process itself creates a structured approach that can be applied across diverse clinical situations and patient populations.
By offering this framework, Uustal enables contemporary nurses to engage in deliberate reflection rather than acting on unchallenged assumptions. This methodical approach to values assessment aligns with modern healthcare communication standards that emphasize informed decision-making and ethical accountability in patient care.
"Ethical framework balances choice with accountability"
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.