Virtue Ethics Theory: Strengths, Traits, and Comparisons
This paper examines virtue ethics as a normative moral theory rooted in Aristotle's philosophy, arguing for its superiority over competing frameworks such as utilitarianism and deontology. The paper outlines the theory's core virtues—courage, temperance, practical wisdom, and justice—and explains how they shape good character and a flourishing life. It discusses the strengths of virtue ethics, including its flexibility, emotional accommodation, and focus on moral character rather than rigid rules. The paper also compares virtue ethics with utilitarianism, highlighting key distinctions regarding self-symmetric concern, reductionism, and the treatment of well-being and virtue as separate but related concepts.
- Introduction to Virtue Ethics Theory: Overview of virtue ethics and Aristotelian foundations
- The Strengths of Virtue Ethics: Why virtue ethics surpasses rule-based moral frameworks
- Virtues as Traits of Character: Character traits as the foundation of virtuous behavior
- The Four Core Virtues: Courage, temperance, practical wisdom, justice, and the Golden Mean
- Comparison with Utilitarianism: Virtue ethics versus utilitarianism on well-being and morality
- Conclusion: Summary of preference for virtue ethics over rigid rules
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly identifies and defends a position—preference for virtue ethics—while systematically contrasting it with competing theories such as utilitarianism and Kantianism, giving the argument comparative depth.
- Concrete examples (a doctor delivering bad news, a judge's training, a person mustering courage after a cancer diagnosis) ground abstract philosophical concepts in relatable, real-world scenarios.
- The discussion of the Golden Mean demonstrates nuanced understanding of Aristotelian ethics, showing that virtue is not a fixed point but a contextually determined balance between excess and deficiency.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs comparative ethical analysis, a standard technique in normative ethics writing. By placing virtue ethics alongside utilitarianism, deontology, and Stoicism, the author clarifies what is distinctive about the virtue-based approach. This method—defining a position by contrast—helps readers understand not just what virtue ethics is, but why the author finds it more compelling than rule- or consequence-based alternatives.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical overview of virtue ethics and its Aristotelian roots, then transitions into a dedicated section on the theory's practical strengths. A central section breaks down the four cardinal virtues individually before examining the Golden Mean. The paper closes with a sustained comparison against utilitarianism and a brief conclusion restating the preference for virtue ethics. This structure moves logically from definition, to strengths, to internal detail, to external comparison, and finally to synthesis.
Introduction to Virtue Ethics Theory
Virtue ethics is one of the most pragmatic moral theories, as it addresses the virtues that mould human character in its attempt to describe the good. The theory suggests that a good life and general well-being result from embracing virtues. It goes further to describe a good, holistic life, proposing that it is a life lived in harmony with others. In his view of humans, Aristotle considered people as both social and rational beings. It is evident that humans tend to coexist in groups; therefore, the theory considers the group as more important than the individual.
The primary virtues encompassed by the theory are temperance, justice, courage, and practical wisdom. All the virtues work in consonance—it would not be of much help to possess one and lack the others. Courage and temperance have a moral inclination; they help us build bravery. Self-control, on the other hand, is attained through restraint. Making the right decisions requires training. We need to learn how to weigh a situation. In the courts of law, judges not only learn on the job; they undergo years of rigorous training before they are bestowed with the title of Justice. Wisdom occupies a higher position in the hierarchy compared to all the other virtues. It is the culmination of learning that takes several years (Virtue Ethics 5).
Virtue ethics accommodates general rules that cover both imperfect and perfect duties, according to Immanuel Kant. The concepts highlighted in Kant's theory are not exactly notions of morality in terms of wrongness and righteousness. They involve notions such as vice and virtue, or the admirable and the deplorable (Slote 5). In the ordinary sense, many traits pass as virtues irrespective of the gains they grant to those who possess or exhibit them. For instance, mustering the courage to face the reality of a cancer diagnosis may cause pain and emotional turmoil for both the sufferer and their family and friends. Virtuous traits tend to be both self-regarding and other-regarding—for example, in virtues such as honesty, trustworthiness, and loyalty. Common sense virtue ethics utilizes such constructs to emphasize the importance of a self-symmetric method towards ethical theory (Slote 8).
Virtue ethics presents a rare opportunity and resource for moral thinking. Some moral scholars, teachers, and writers consider it a superior framework to rule-based theories in professional and business settings. Some common rule theories it contrasts with include utilitarianism, Kantianism, and intuitionism (Audi 273). Virtue ethics is also different from other normative approaches such as situation ethics and utilitarianism. While those two emphasize the nuances of whether an act is right or wrong, virtue ethics instead asks whether the persons performing the acts are good—with regard to the quality or virtues they possess. Virtue ethics is inclined towards the virtues that make for a good quality of life.
This approach was popularized towards the middle of the twentieth century, although its roots are traced back to the teachings of Aristotle. Virtue ethics is one of the three major approaches in normative ethics (Boss 389). It can be identified initially as the one that places emphasis on virtues or moral character, in contrast to the approach that focuses on rules or duties (deontology), or the one that focuses on the effects or consequences of actions (consequentialism). Consider the case where it is obvious that someone in need must be helped: in the utilitarian perspective, the judgement depends on whether helping such a person will enhance well-being to the maximum (Hursthouse, para. 1–4).
The Strengths of Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics refrains from applying a formula such as "the greatest good for the greatest number" to guide people on what they ought or ought not to do. It focuses instead on what people should be. Virtue ethics espouses the importance of distinguishing good people from mere legalists; merely following the rules and obeying the law does not make one a good person. Virtue ethics looks at the importance of encouraging people to aspire to be good.
Virtue ethics utilizes education to demonstrate that good deeds are self-rewarding. It shows how humans learn and imitate virtues from those around them, and it reveals how we acquire and develop moral principles throughout our lives. It points out that every moment in life is an opportunity to cultivate a virtue. We are thereby enabled to integrate many aspects of our lives—including emotional elements, commitments to other people, social responsibilities, and friendships. In other words, virtue ethics accommodates our emotional disposition.
Virtue ethics is more concerned with how people react to ethical dilemmas and focuses on the wider perspective. It seems to encourage a degree of bias in favour of friends and family, which distinguishes it from utilitarianism, which considers impartiality a critical element in ethical and moral pursuit. Virtue ethics does not provide a specific formula for navigating ethically confusing situations. Rather, it seeks to teach people to be good persons so that they can act morally when such situations arise. The emphasis is on character rather than on ethical theories to guide decision-making. Indeed, anyone who helps the poor out of genuine compassion is morally superior to one who does the same merely as a call of duty (Slote 15).
Conclusion
Virtue ethics is favourable because it targets character and examines the actions that would constitute a good person. There is little emphasis on rules; the focus is on helping people grow character traits that will assist them in making the right decisions throughout life. Virtue ethics offers flexibility, as it is not anchored to a set of absolute rules. It embraces the need to distinguish legalists from genuinely good people, and it does not attempt to prescribe what a good person should do in every situation. Instead, it aims to make us good people so that we do not need a theoretical formula to decide for us.
Works Cited
Audi, Robert. "Virtue Ethics as a Resource in Business." Business Ethics Quarterly 22.2 (2012): 273–291. Business Source Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2016.
Boss, Judith A. Ethics for Life: A Text with Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2011. Print.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. "Virtue Ethics." Stanford University. Stanford University, 2003. Web. 04 Apr. 2016.
Slote, Michael. "From Morality to Virtue." University Press Scholarship. 1995. Web. 05 Apr. 2016.
"Virtue Ethics — Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2016.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.