Virtue Ethics and the Path to Good Character
This paper examines virtue ethics as a philosophical framework developed by ancient Greek thinkers Aristotle and Plato, arguing that it remains the most compelling ethical theory available. The essay explains core concepts including the golden mean, the role of character development, and the importance of self-examination in moral life. It contrasts virtue ethics with alternative frameworks such as Kantian deontology and ethical egoism, highlighting the distinctive advantages of a character-centered approach. The paper also addresses the primary criticism of virtue ethics — the subjective determination of correct motives — before concluding that virtue ethics offers the most flexible and personally meaningful guide to ethical decision-making.
- Introduction: The Challenge of Ethical Theory: Ethics resists universal definition despite centuries of philosophical effort
- Core Principles of Virtue Ethics: Aristotle and Plato's character-based ethics and the golden mean
- The Advantage of a Character-Centered Approach: Character guides ethical action without rigid rules or self-interest
- Virtue Ethics Compared to Other Ethical Theories: Contrasting virtue ethics with Kantian and egoist frameworks
- Emotional Dimensions and Criticisms of Virtue Ethics: Emotion, motivation, and the subjectivity objection addressed
- Conclusion: Virtue Ethics as a Personal Journey: Virtue ethics validated as a flexible, enduring personal moral guide
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper builds its argument progressively, moving from definition and historical context through comparative analysis before arriving at a clear evaluative conclusion.
- It consistently anchors abstract philosophical concepts — such as the golden mean and good character — in concrete, accessible language, making the argument easy to follow.
- The direct comparison with Kantian ethics and egoism gives the argument structure and highlights virtue ethics' distinctive strengths without caricaturing rival positions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative philosophical analysis: it establishes one framework in detail, then measures it against alternatives using consistent evaluative criteria (motivation, decision process, flexibility, and emotional realism). This technique allows the thesis — that virtue ethics is the most valid ethical theory — to emerge from the analysis itself rather than being asserted without support.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by framing the difficulty of universal ethics before introducing virtue ethics historically. Subsequent paragraphs develop core concepts (golden mean, character, self-examination), then contrast virtue ethics with deontological and egoist rivals. The paper addresses the chief criticism — subjectivity of correct motives — before a conclusion that reaffirms Aristotle's enduring relevance. The structure is thesis-driven and linear, appropriate for an undergraduate philosophy essay.
Introduction: The Challenge of Ethical Theory
Despite the fact that codes of conduct and belief systems permeate everyone's life on an everyday basis, developing a universally acceptable concept of ethics or moral philosophy remains a seemingly impossible task — one that has plagued philosophers and the world's great thinkers since the beginning of time. Over time, a great number of different philosophical theories have arisen. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and each has enjoyed its own period of popularity. Yet, strangely, despite the fact that some of the world's greatest minds have spent their lives formulating competing theories, the theory that seemingly possesses the greatest degree of validity is also the one with the longest history: virtue ethics.
Core Principles of Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics was developed as a theory by the ancient Greek philosophers. Aristotle and Plato, in developing their views toward ethics, placed little importance on the rules that people should obey or follow and instead focused on the importance of basic character. At the center of virtue ethics is the concept of the golden mean. The golden mean is the proper balancing of two extremes, which results in a condition known as virtue. Proponents of virtue ethics argue that persons with good character will ultimately make good decisions without any consideration for rules or moral obligations.
For Aristotle and Plato, and all followers of the philosophy of virtue ethics, life is a journey whose ultimate goal is to develop good character and, in the process, rid oneself of bad habits such as greed or anger. Such habits stand in the way of developing good character and must be moderated in order to demonstrate progress as a moral person. For Aristotle and other proponents of virtue ethics, habits such as greed and anger, in moderation, can be useful — but when taken to an extreme they become bad habits and interfere with the development of good character.
The starting point for virtue ethics is a determination of what traits of character make one a good person. Some of these traits, such as courage and generosity, are easily recognized as virtues, but virtue can vary from society to society or individual to individual. What is important in the pursuit of good character is the self-examination that accompanies the process — a process that involves finding a balance between extremes.
The Advantage of a Character-Centered Approach
The great advantage of virtue ethics, and the thing that distinguishes it from all other philosophical approaches, is that it allows individuals to do things not because they ought to — as in Kant's deontological theory — or because it is in their own best interest, as in egoism, but because it is virtuous for them to do so. Decisions in virtue ethics are made as part of the process of developing good character, not because there is any rightness or wrongness involved, or because someone might benefit from deciding one way or another. Decisions are made because they lead one toward developing good character.
One clear advantage of virtue ethics is that it does not force one to ask what should I do? — instead, the question becomes how should I live? The decision-maker does not have to balance relative interests. The proper course of action is what one's character determines it to be. Acting in accordance with one's character will render the proper decision. Followers of Kant are more concerned with moral imperatives, while egoists focus on self-interest. Virtue ethics is concerned with the development of good character because, as good character develops, the correct choices are also made.
Conclusion: Virtue Ethics as a Personal Journey
In the final analysis, all ethical theories have their value and, at times, each seems most valid. In reviewing them, all should be viewed as merely suggestions or ideas, not rigid approaches to making decisions or leading one's life. Life is a process and a journey, and along the way each individual is faced with a multitude of decisions — some easy and some complicated — and there is no one right way of making them.
This is the beauty of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics recognizes that morals and ethics are personal, and that the journey toward attaining goodness will eventually provide the answers as to how to conduct one's life. Once that state of goodness is obtained, ethical decision-making is no longer a problem: one's character will dictate what to do and how to do it. Aristotle was right thousands of years ago, and nothing offered in the interim by the world's greatest thinkers has done anything to invalidate his basic ideas. As long as an individual makes every attempt to be as good a person as he or she can be, the correct decision will ultimately be made.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.