This paper examines the leadership qualities displayed by Arthur Wellesley — the future Duke of Wellington — at the Battle of Assaye (1803) against the Maratha forces in India. Drawing on Robert Harvey's framework of sixteen traits found in successful maverick military commanders, the paper argues that Wellesley demonstrated exemplary courage under fire, cool rational thinking, independent merit, strategic and tactical battlefield awareness, and genuine concern for his troops. The analysis connects these early qualities to Wellington's later decisive defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815, suggesting that Assaye served as the proving ground for the leadership characteristics that would define one of Britain's greatest battlefield commanders.
The paper demonstrates framework-driven character analysis: it takes an external scholarly model (Harvey's trait list) and uses it as a lens to interpret historical evidence. This technique is common in military history and leadership studies, and this paper shows how to apply a multi-trait framework selectively and rigorously without forcing every trait onto the subject when evidence is limited.
The paper opens by situating Wellesley within Harvey's broader work and establishing the stakes (Waterloo, British great-power status). Subsequent sections move through Harvey's traits roughly in numerical order — courage, rationality, merit, tactical grasp, fighting against odds, and care for troops — each supported by quotations from Harvey and Cavendish. The conclusion synthesizes the findings and gestures toward Wellesley's full career as further evidence.
The British general Arthur Wellesley beautifully fits the model of a maverick military commander offered by Robert Harvey in his work Maverick Military Leaders: The Extraordinary Battles of Washington, Nelson, Patton, Rommel, and Others. Harvey's book discusses Wellesley's first significant battle against Maratha forces — the Battle of Assaye — at length. In Harvey's formulation, the future Duke of Wellington can be understood to exhibit most, if not all, of the sixteen traits found in successful battlefield commanders. Indeed, Wellington would go on to defeat Napoleon and end the putative emperor's reign at the decisive Battle of Waterloo in 1815. The victory at Waterloo would secure Britain's position as a great power in continental politics and affairs for the next century and a half.
It can fairly be said that the qualities of leadership Wellesley displayed at Assaye were a precursor to his eventually becoming one of the United Kingdom's greatest battlefield commanders. In fact, Wellington considered the fighting at Assaye to be his "finest battle" (Harvey, p. 195).
What leadership characteristics did Wellesley display in the Indian campaigns? According to Harvey's framework, the general displayed the first trait of "outstanding and exemplary courage under fire" (Harvey, p. xlvi). According to Richard Cavendish at History Today, Wellesley personally led his troops to ford the Kaitna River and organize a bayonet attack against the Maratha forces. Over the course of directing the battle, Wellesley had two horses shot out from under him as he directed his troops against surprisingly effective counter-maneuvers by the stubborn Maratha forces (Harvey, p. 195; Cavendish, 2003). His courage and willingness to share the risks of battlefield fighting served as an example to his troops that he was not afraid to face the same dangers he would ask of the lowest-ranking infantryman — thereby inspiring all his troops to follow his lead.
The second characteristic Wellesley displayed, according to Harvey's schema, was the "ability to think coolly and rationally on the battlefield" (Harvey, p. xlvi). Harvey informs his readers that one of Wellesley's generals exclaimed that "no man could have shown a better example to his troops than he did. I never saw a man so cool and collected" (Harvey, p. 195). The fact that Wellesley was able to maintain his composure against a determined and numerically superior force — and emerge victorious — is a testament to this trait. As for the third trait in Harvey's formulation — the determination to make one's own way to the top on merit — here too we find Wellesley. Cavendish writes that Wellesley's peers and rivals were convinced he received his command because his brother was the Governor-General of India; nevertheless, Wellesley's accounting of himself at Assaye, and in his future battles, proved that he had the necessary mettle to be a legitimate premier battlefield commander (Cavendish, 2003).
Regarding Harvey's sixth and seventh traits — the ability to grasp the strategic and tactical battlefield situation in order to seize unexpected advantage and attain a superior fighting position — Arthur Wellesley acquitted himself superbly here as well. Wellesley surveyed the surrounding ground and used it to his army's advantage. He understood that he held finer, higher ground from which to ford the river and begin his attack, and he was able to use this better terrain to direct his troops and cavalry against the enemy's flanks. As the Maratha forces countered Wellesley's moves with what Harvey describes as "European efficiency," the future duke was able to recognize his opponent's skill and intention and react accordingly, protecting his own flanks while destroying those of his opponent (Cavendish, 2003).
Cavendish, Richard. (2003). History Today. Retrieved from www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/battle-assaye
Harvey, R. (2008). Maverick Military Leaders: The Extraordinary Battles of Washington, Nelson, Patton, Rommel, and Others. Skyhorse Publishing.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.