Westminster Company Supply Chain Redesign Case Study
This case study examines the supply chain and logistics challenges facing Westminster Company, one of the world's largest producers of healthcare consumer products. Operating across multiple continents through three decentralized subsidiaries and eight distribution centers, the company struggles with inefficiencies including excessive fixed costs and less-than-truckload shipments. The paper evaluates three proposed improvements—POS-driven demand forecasting, reduced order cycle times, and integrated logistics technologies—and recommends consolidating the existing warehouse network to achieve economies of scale, reduce redundant distribution centers, and better meet evolving customer requirements in a competitive pharmaceutical market.
- Case Overview and Background: Company profile, decentralized structure, and logistics problem
- Proposed Alternatives for Supply Chain Improvement: POS systems, order cycle reduction, and logistics technology
- Logistical System Design and Warehouse Consolidation: Consolidated warehouse design, cost savings, and scale economies
- Risks and Trade-offs of Consolidation: Drawbacks of consolidation and public vs. private warehouse options
- Conclusion: Summary recommendation for integrated supply chain overhaul
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every recommendation in cited academic sources (Bowersox, Leong, Walters), lending credibility to practical proposals.
- Presents a balanced analysis by acknowledging the costs and trade-offs of consolidation alongside its benefits, avoiding one-sided advocacy.
- Moves logically from problem identification to alternative solutions to system design, creating a clear decision-support structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: it uses real operational data (specific distribution centers, projected savings of $3,321,000, SKU-level forecasting) alongside theoretical frameworks from supply chain literature to evaluate concrete business decisions. This anchoring of theory to specific measurable outcomes is characteristic of strong business case writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a company background and problem statement, then details the findings of an internal study that motivates change. Three discrete alternatives are proposed and explained. The paper then shifts to system design, evaluating warehouse consolidation options (private vs. public) and their operational implications. A brief conclusion synthesizes the recommendation. This problem–alternatives–design–conclusion arc is a standard and effective structure for supply chain case studies at the undergraduate level.
Case Overview and Background
This case study presents a supply chain analysis of Westminster Company, one of the world's largest producers of healthcare consumer products. The pharmaceutical company, established in the early twentieth century, currently operates across the United States, Latin America, Europe, and the Pacific Rim. Westminster owns three major manufacturing subsidiaries and eight distribution centers, with products spanning drugs (20%), mass merchandise (25%), and grocery products (37%). The company faces the challenge of maintaining an efficient logistics and supply chain system in a highly competitive market. Its three subsidiaries operate under a decentralized management system, which encourages self-ownership and responsibility and motivates entrepreneurial management.
An efficient logistics system is critical to business success. It ensures that inventory is stocked on retailers' shelves; delays in replenishment strain the relationship between manufacturer and retailer. Westminster currently adopts a decentralized distribution network in which each autonomous subsidiary uses its own standalone distribution centers to deliver inventory. Leong (2012) cautions that decentralized distribution systems negatively affect profitability due to excessive fixed operating costs. As a result, Westminster does not adopt direct shipments and consequently reports mostly less-than-truckload consignments, increasing the cost of shipment. Given the evolution of supply chain systems and growing pressures from both competitors and customers, it is essential for Westminster Company to reevaluate its logistical management system.
Accordingly, Westminster commissioned a study to establish a customer overview and identify operational management changes critical to the firm's success. The research found that a majority of domestic sales were driven by just 10% of customers, with the largest customers accounting for significantly increased domestic revenues. The study also identified intensified competition from private-label companies that adopt integrated logistics and operate more cost-efficiently. Customers were found to be increasingly specific in their logistics requirements, demanding efficient planning, supply chain collaboration, information technology integration, and reliable order fulfillment. Finally, the study observed that Westminster's core customers derive higher profit margins from their relationship with the company, meaning that advanced integration would represent a meaningful competitive edge.
References
Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Cooper, M. B. (2007). Supply chain logistics management (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Leong, W. T. (2012). Principles of supply chain management. South-Western.
Walters, D. (2010). Global logistics: New directions in supply chain management. Kogan Page Limited.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.