This paper examines the talent management practices employed by Whirlpool Corporation in response to business growth, global expansion, and increasing consumer demand for innovation. It discusses the key factors that shaped Whirlpool's talent needs, including market expansion into developing economies such as Brazil and India. The paper then explores how Whirlpool's Leadership Model guided recruitment and succession planning, and how three core metrics—leadership attributes, leadership performance, and leadership practices—were used to improve hiring quality. Finally, it considers future challenges such as evaluator bias and the need for effective, objective performance evaluations to sustain long-term talent development.
Several factors had a significant impact on Whirlpool Corporation and its talent needs, including the growth of the business, consumer demand for new innovations, and the necessity to attract and retain the best talent. With respect to business growth, the company was focused on expanding into a number of different markets and acquiring competitors that could help improve its business model. This created a need for the firm to seek out new talent in areas that would help the organization maintain and increase its momentum across different segments.
Consumer demand for innovative products meant that Whirlpool had to find the best executives and engineers capable of incorporating the latest technology into their strategy. This affected the company's talent needs, as it required seeking out a wide variety of individuals in different regions to address the various needs of customers. As a result, this had a direct effect on Whirlpool's ability to attract and retain key talent. As the firm continued to expand, it had to find people who could help it adapt to changes in the marketplace. At the same time, it required some of the best managers in the industry to make its various acquisitions work successfully.
When these different elements are considered together, they illustrate why Whirlpool had to continually seek out the best and brightest individuals to join its organization. This was the means by which the company could maintain its competitive lead and build upon the foundation that had been established. (Johnson, 2003, pp. 325–341; Goldsmith, 2010, pp. 258–269)
The company's global expansion meant that Whirlpool was rapidly moving into many developing markets, such as Brazil and India. This created the need to find managers and employees who understood these markets deeply. At the same time, the company faced significant competition from numerous firms already operating in those regions. This forced Whirlpool to change its focus regarding the kinds of individuals it was seeking. Specifically, it wanted to find people with the flexibility to evolve alongside the various transformations occurring in those environments. Equally important, these individuals had to possess the skills necessary to adapt to the strategy and culture of the firm. (Kluyver, 2010, pp. 35–54; Goldsmith, 2010, pp. 258–269)
The objective of Whirlpool's leadership model was to develop a strategy in which all managers would recognize and work with those individuals who had the ability to excel at the company. This was based on several key factors, including establishing common standards for assessing employees, managing talent and succession planning, and studying external talent sources.
The model was used to manage employees by identifying individuals who possessed the skill sets, mental attitude, and drive to help the company achieve its long-term goals. Once such individuals joined the organization, they were able to work within the firm to keep it competitive across many areas. The ideas they brought with them allowed Whirlpool to identify companies and markets that could improve its overall bottom-line results. This is the point at which the company's underlying financial performance began to improve dramatically, driven by its ability to quickly adapt to marketplace transformations. (Goldsmith, 2010, pp. 258–269; Hunt, 2006, pp. 99–110)
Several parameters were used to improve the company's understanding of the talent it hired, including leadership attributes, leadership performance, and leadership practices.
Leadership attributes refers to the examination of the character and values embraced by a particular individual. These include an assessment of the person's confidence, their commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their thought process. This is important because it helped the firm identify someone who shares a similar philosophy and approach to that of the organization. When this alignment exists, the individual is more compatible with the firm and the philosophy it employs to achieve its objectives. (Goldsmith, 2010, pp. 258–269; Hunt, 2006, pp. 99–110)
Leadership performance focuses on a person's ability to deliver above-average results for the firm. This involves several elements, including the ability to meet various objectives and the desire to drive change within the work environment. These factors are important because they identify individuals who have the ambition to go the extra mile—precisely the kind of person Whirlpool wants in order to maintain its dominance in key markets. (Goldsmith, 2010, pp. 258–269; Hunt, 2006, pp. 99–110)
"Three leadership metrics used to evaluate and select talent"
"Addressing bias and improving evaluation for long-term talent"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.