This paper examines Whitfield Lovell's visual art through the lens of Kevin Quashie's critical essay on quietude and interiority in black artistic expression. The analysis explores how Lovell's "Kin" series uses historical imagery — barbed wire, whips, and flags — to reference the legacy of slavery while simultaneously resisting the reduction of subjects to mere racial symbols. The paper argues that Lovell balances political consciousness with deeply individualized portraiture, compelling viewers to confront both the collective trauma of slavery and the irreducible humanity of each subject. It also considers the challenge of viewing black art without the filter of America's racial discourse.
On the surface, the unique "blackness" of the experiences chronicled by Whitfield Lovell in his art may seem to exist only at the level of subject matter. As detailed in Kevin Quashie's essay "More than you know: The quiet art of Whitfield Lovell," there is a quietude and interiority to Lovell's works that is not typically associated with black art and the black artistic experience in America. Quashie, in his analysis of Lovell's works, makes an appeal for the rights of African-Americans to create a private, interior space for the soul — one that exists outside the realm of public discourse. By focusing on individuality and humanity, he stresses the need for African-American artists to transcend the dichotomies created by politics.
Yet the need to claim "I am" and to engage in soul-searching about one's identity is a critical aspect of the psychology of the American black experience, given that one's right to say "I am a man" or "I am a woman" is so often denied. This tension between interior selfhood and external political reality runs throughout Lovell's body of work, making it both deeply personal and historically resonant.
The history of the black experience is subtly implied in Lovell's works such as "Run like the wind," which portrays a black woman alongside barbed wire that symbolically suggests a fence, a manacle, and a crown of thorns all at once. Lovell calls this work Kin XXXII. Even though the woman in the picture is not his blood relation, he feels he shares a kinship with all African-Americans who were subjected to slavery and who resisted that institution. The woman's nineteenth-century garb confirms this association.
Other images in the "Kin" series include pictures of a woman's face near an overseer's whip, and a man's face alongside small images of the American flag — suggesting an ironic juxtaposition of patriotism with the face of someone denied his rights. All of the faces are highly individualized, yet the commonness of the experiences of slavery in the United States unites them, not simply their race.
"How Lovell resists political categorization through portraiture"
"Can viewers separate race from Lovell's subjects?"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.