This essay examines Arthur Miller's argument in "Tragedy and the Common Man" through the lens of his character Willy Loman from Death of a Salesman. The paper argues that Loman exemplifies Miller's thesis that tragedy is not confined to nobility or the wealthy but extends to ordinary people driven by dignity and personal struggle. By analyzing Loman's insecurities, his pursuit of the American dream, and his ultimate sacrifice for his family, the essay demonstrates how Miller's modern tragedy is more relatable and emotionally resonant than classical tragic forms. The paper concludes that contemporary audiences connect more powerfully with average characters facing recognizable conflicts than with historical kings and nobles.
In Arthur Miller's essay "Tragedy and the Common Man," he challenges the idea that only wealthy, noble characters can fully understand and appreciate tragedy. This thought is not a reflection of his own opinion; rather, Miller argues in favor of tragedy and the common, working-class man. He contends that tragedy knows no income boundaries, but instead focuses on a person who would "lay down his life...to secure one thing—his sense of personal dignity." This redefinition of tragic experience forms the foundation for understanding his most famous work, Death of a Salesman.
Willy Loman is, by all accounts, a tragic hero according to modern Arthur Miller-type definitions. Loman is hardworking and relentless in his pursuit of the American dream. His tragic flaw, however, is that he cannot recognize how desperately his family wants to love him. Yet Willy loves his family deeply enough to sacrifice himself in order to give Biff the American dream that he could not obtain himself. This internal conflict between what Loman perceives and what actually exists in his family relationships drives the play's emotional intensity.
Unlike the Oedipuses or Caesars of classical and Shakespearean drama, Loman is not a self-assured king or figure of authority—in fact, he is quite the opposite. His insecurities as a father, a man, a husband, and a salesman form the foundation of his tragedy. Loman would not be the character he is without those characteristics. His inability to see past corporate America prevents him from becoming the man he could have been, and that makes him far easier for the average person to relate to. Everyone has wanted to reach certain material goals in their lives, and Loman's struggle to achieve financial success is the central conflict of the play. In this way, Miller's tragedy is much more effective than dramas written centuries ago—Miller makes the Loman family average, "just like us," thereby bridging the gap between audience and protagonist that classical distance could never achieve.
"Emotional impact shifts to family members"
In conclusion, it is unrealistic to judge tragedies in today's time by the standards that classical theorists set forth centuries ago. It is more effective for the reader to feel that tragedy can be overcome by an average man—not just royalty. Likewise, sympathy for the "hero" is not strictly required, though sympathy for the situation is more likely and more profound. Miller is one of the great modern playwrights, and his argument for "Tragedy and the Common Man" is not only valid but is epitomized by his creation, Willy Loman. Through this character, Miller successfully demonstrated that tragic experience belongs to all people, regardless of station, and that the struggles of ordinary men can move audiences as deeply as the fall of kings.
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.