Wind Power Investment: Expected Value and Risk Analysis
This paper evaluates whether to invest in a wind power venture by applying core financial decision-making frameworks. The analysis calculates a weighted average expected payoff of 146.5% across three probability-weighted scenarios tied to oil price fluctuations. It then considers risk aversion as an alternative framework, assesses the quality of underlying estimates sourced from OPEC analyst projections, and examines why capital budgeting techniques such as net present value cannot be applied given data limitations. The paper concludes that the weighted average of expected future cash flows is the most appropriate model, supporting the decision to invest.
- Introduction: The Investment Opportunity: Wind power investment context and oil price dependency
- Calculating the Weighted Average Expected Payoff: Step-by-step weighted average yields 146.5% return
- Risk Aversion as a Decision Framework: Risk aversion examined and found less applicable here
- Evaluating Estimate Quality and Data Limitations: Single-analyst OPEC estimates raise reliability concerns
- Capital Budgeting Techniques and Their Applicability: NPV and sensitivity analysis ruled out due to data gaps
- Conclusion: Investment Decision: Weighted average model supports proceeding with investment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies multiple financial frameworks—expected value, risk aversion, and capital budgeting—and clearly explains why each is or is not suitable for the scenario.
- Demonstrates transparent arithmetic: the weighted average calculation is shown step by step, making the reasoning easy to follow and verify.
- Acknowledges the limitations of its own analysis, particularly the garbage-in/garbage-out problem with single-analyst OPEC estimates, adding intellectual honesty to the argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses comparative framework analysis: rather than simply applying one model, it surveys several decision tools, evaluates their appropriateness given available data, and selects the most defensible approach. This method of explicitly ruling out alternatives strengthens the justification for the chosen model.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by describing the investment context and its dependency on oil prices. It then performs and interprets the weighted average calculation. Next it addresses risk aversion, both as a general concept and in relation to this specific scenario. A critical section examines the reliability of the probability estimates. The paper then considers and dismisses capital budgeting as inapplicable, before concluding with a clear investment recommendation grounded in the analysis.
Introduction: The Investment Opportunity
An opportunity has arisen to invest in wind power. The startup costs of this investment are fixed, but the expected future cash flows are not. These depend on the level of adoption of wind power in society, which in turn depends on the price of oil. The higher the price of oil, the more people will use wind power. However, if the price of oil drops, fewer people will adopt wind power as an alternative energy source.
To decide whether to invest, we need to estimate the expected outcome of the investment. Two primary financial frameworks are available: the weighted average of expected payoffs and risk aversion analysis. In addition, capital budgeting techniques such as net present value may be considered where data permit.
Calculating the Weighted Average Expected Payoff
The simplest method of evaluating an investment is to calculate a weighted average of the expected payoff. Given that each scenario is scaled evenly, we need only consider the percentage gains across outcomes. The three scenarios are as follows:
15% chance of making 300% + 50% chance of making 140% + 35% chance of making 90% = expected payoff.
Working through the arithmetic: (0.15 × 300) + (0.50 × 140) + (0.35 × 90) = 45 + 70 + 31.5 = 146.5%. Therefore, a $5,000 investment would return $7,325. Based on this expected outcome, the decision is to invest in wind power.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.