This paper examines the WorldCom financial scandal, one of the largest accounting frauds in U.S. corporate history. It traces WorldCom's rapid rise from a regional telecommunications operator to a global giant, driven by aggressive acquisitions and favorable market conditions. The paper explains how executives Bernard Ebbers and Scott Sullivan manipulated accounting records by reclassifying operating expenses as capital investments to artificially inflate profits. It also addresses the complicity of outside auditor Arthur Andersen and situates the fraud within the broader context of the 1990s telecommunications boom and the near-simultaneous Enron collapse.
Shortly before the financial debacle that resulted in its collapse, the telecommunications company WorldCom was the second-largest U.S. long-distance phone company. WorldCom was one of the pioneers of the 1990s telecommunications boom. "An aggressive acquisition spree saw it grow from a small-time regional operator in the early 1980s to a huge international business," but also saddled it with $30 billion in debt ("U.S. Telecom Giant Admits Huge Fraud," BBC News, 2002). The rapacious environment in telecommunications that gave birth to WorldCom emerged after the giant communications company AT&T was declared an illegal monopoly. WorldCom's founder and CEO, Bernard Ebbers, "bought up spare telephone time and repackaged it at bargain prices. In a low-margin business, WorldCom needed to grow to survive, and the fast-talking Mr. Ebbers bought more than 75 firms during the second half of the 1990s." Ebbers used high-volume selling to increase profits (Arnold, 2002).
Ebbers' financial aggressiveness alone cannot claim full credit for the firm's meteoric rise. WorldCom also profited from the expansion of IT technology by broadening its services into Internet and data traffic. WorldCom and Ebbers arrived at just the right moment — the legal, economic, and technological climate of the era created a perfect storm to propel the company forward. In 1997, WorldCom took over telecom giant MCI and nearly captured third-tier market giant Sprint, moves that brought WorldCom to worldwide attention (Arnold, 2002).
WorldCom's CEO Bernard Ebbers borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars from the firm to underwrite the inflated prices he had paid for the company's own shares.
When the scandal about WorldCom's profit inflation was first revealed, there was almost a collective yawn in the broader business community — except among those whose lives and finances were directly affected. The even more notorious Enron collapse had occurred shortly before the WorldCom revelations. However, "the scale of the overstatement is of a different magnitude. Enron overstated its profits by $600 million. WorldCom's manipulated figures are six times as large" ("WorldCom: Why It Matters," BBC News, 2002).
What exactly did WorldCom do? "WorldCom's dodge was relatively simple." In 2001 and 2002, the company falsely classified its normal operating expenses — routine costs such as employee salaries and office supplies — as capital investment activities. This was a kind of polite fiction, except that what constitutes a capital investment under accounting law is quite clearly defined. A genuine investment, such as purchasing new equipment or building a new factory, is expected to add long-term value to the company. Because investments are long-term projects, they are permitted to be accounted for differently from ordinary day-to-day expenditures. Under WorldCom's fraudulent accounting system, however, a new ream of computer paper was treated as much of an "investment project" as introducing a new operating system designed to increase efficiency.
From an accounting perspective, this meant that WorldCom could spread the costs of these fictional investment expenses across multiple years, rather than recording them immediately as expenditures that reduced its profit margin. This made WorldCom's profits appear far greater than those of its competitors, had the figures been computed accurately. The company thus seemed far more attractive to investors due to this artificially inflated profit margin. In fact, instead of the $1.3 billion profit WorldCom claimed in 2002, the company was actually operating at a loss when its revenues and expenditures were calculated using legal, conventional accounting methods ("WorldCom: Why It Matters," BBC News, 2002).
"Ebbers, Sullivan, and Arthur Andersen's roles"
The WorldCom scandal stands as one of the most damaging corporate frauds in American history, surpassing even Enron in the scale of its accounting misstatements. Driven by executive greed, enabled by complicit auditors, and fueled by the speculative frenzy of the telecommunications boom, WorldCom's collapse exposed critical weaknesses in corporate governance and financial oversight that prompted significant regulatory reform in the years that followed.
You’re 76% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.