This paper analyzes the World Trade Organization's impact on international law and interstate relationships from three perspectives. First, it argues that the WTO's centralized structure and transparent dispute resolution mechanisms directly strengthen international law, while its deference to existing intergovernmental bodies adds further legitimacy. Second, it examines how the WTO's detailed dispute resolution processes improve relations between states by compartmentalizing trade conflicts and relieving national governments of certain diplomatic burdens. Third, it applies liberal institutionalism to explain the WTO's effectiveness, highlighting how the organization balances self-interested state behavior with long-term cooperative frameworks that reduce uncontrolled conflict and promote mutual benefit.
The World Trade Organization impacts international law in both direct and indirect ways, and it provides strength to international law even in ways that might on the surface appear to weaken it. First, and most directly, the WTO is far more centralized than most other bodies and systems of international law, which adds a great deal of strength to the legal workings of the international community within the WTO (Pauwelyn, 2001). The rules and hierarchies established by the WTO provide clear guidance with direct and transparent means for appeal and redressing grievances, making the organization a far more effective, decisive, and objective body for international arbitration and rule-setting than other international and intergovernmental organizations (Pauwelyn, 2001; Pauwelyn, 2003). This has led to a direct strengthening of international law, as all areas governed by the WTO — though this governance is not sovereign or exclusive — have a centralized authority they can appeal to, one that wields direct, even, and transparent power in settling disputes and setting rules (Pauwelyn, 2001; Pauwelyn, 2003).
At the same time, the strength of the WTO — which is, ultimately, a non-governmental body — could be seen as delegitimizing both international and national governments. An inspection of the WTO's own governing rules belies this notion, however; the construction and wording of the various articles shows the clear deference to international law embedded in the very fabric of the WTO (Pauwelyn, 2003). In this manner, the WTO adds legitimacy to existing governments and intergovernmental partnerships and unions, further strengthening international law by lending its support to bodies of international law and the various organizations that determine and enforce agreements of conduct between nations.
It goes without saying that relationships between states will improve when there is a clear, established, authoritative, and effective body in place to handle disputes, set rules, and otherwise manage interstate relationships — and this is precisely what the WTO provides (Petersmann, 1997; Pauwelyn, 2001; Pauwelyn, 2003). The specific manner in which the WTO goes about influencing and assisting interstate relationships is another substantial strength of the organization. The detailed dispute resolution process the WTO enforces covers all manner of violation-based disputes as well as non-violation-based complaints between states (Petersmann, 1997). Having a dedicated, specific, and detailed means of addressing and resolving conflicts greatly improves relationships between states — not only through the concrete instances of dispute resolution, but also by more effectively compartmentalizing issues of dispute (Petersmann, 1997). By providing an effective means for resolving trade-related disputes and conflicts, the WTO helps to prevent such issues from inflaming or compounding other historic or sociocultural tensions.
It has also been noted that growing interdependency in world economies has led to a decreased governing capacity for many national governments, and the WTO actually assists in this regard as well (Pauwelyn, 2003; Jackson, 2006). The WTO relieves certain burdens of governing and alleviates certain diplomatic pressures by providing extra-national means of developing and conducting interstate trade, which can ease relationships between states in many ways (Jackson, 2006). Providing a specific avenue for states to approach each other and develop trade and other agreements also offers an obvious benefit to interstate relationships.
"Theory explaining WTO's cooperative and conflict-reducing role"
"Cited scholarly sources and academic texts"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.