Law of Attraction in Relationships and Intercultural Communication
This paper examines the metaphysical law of attraction and its relevance to interpersonal and intercultural communication. Beginning with philosophical and spiritual perspectives on human potential and universal law, the paper surveys social psychology research on depersonalized attraction, superordinate identities, and in-group bias. It then draws extensively on John Gottman's research to analyze the roles of positive and negative affect in marital relationships, conflict management, and the predictors of divorce. The paper concludes by connecting the law of attraction to cross-cultural communication in healthcare settings, arguing that cultivating positivity and mutual understanding strengthens bonds across personal, familial, and culturally diverse relationships.
- Metaphysical Law of Attraction: Philosophical and spiritual foundations of universal attraction
- Need for the Law of Attraction in the Modern Era: Globalization's benefits, harms, and the relevance of attraction
- Attitudes, Social Identity, and Superordinate Identities: Social psychology of in-group bias and shared identity
- Positive Affect in Everyday Interactions and Conflict Management: Gottman's research on positivity, bids for connection, and conflict
- Negative Affect as an Indicator of Relationship Distress: Four Horsemen, divorce predictors, and relational dialectics
- Positive Affect, Respect, and Admiration: Respect and admiration as foundations of lasting relationships
- Law of Attraction and Intercultural Communication: Cross-cultural communication strategies in healthcare settings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds an abstract metaphysical concept — the law of attraction — in concrete, peer-reviewed social psychology and communication research, lending empirical credibility to its central argument.
- It draws on a range of sources, from Gottman's longitudinal marital research to Social Identity Theory, allowing the thesis to apply across personal, social, and intercultural contexts.
- The paper consistently links its evidence back to the central claim that positivity attracts positivity, maintaining thematic coherence across diverse subject areas.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis across disciplines. It weaves together spiritual philosophy, social psychology (SIT, groupthink, in-group bias), communication theory (Relational Dialectics, Gottman's Sound Marital House), and applied healthcare diversity literature under a single unifying thesis. This cross-disciplinary synthesis is used to argue that a universal principle — positive attraction — operates consistently across different levels and contexts of human interaction.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with philosophical framing and a statement of the thesis. It then establishes the contemporary need for the law of attraction through a discussion of globalization's benefits and harms. The middle sections develop the argument through social psychology research on attitudes and identity, followed by extended engagement with Gottman's marital research covering positive affect, conflict management, negative affect, and divorce predictors. The paper closes by connecting these principles to intercultural communication and healthcare diversity, and a brief conclusion synthesizes all strands of the argument.
Metaphysical Law of Attraction
"Thou, constrained by no limits, in accordance with thine own free will, in whose hand we have placed thee, shalt ordain for thyself the limits of thy nature." — Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Oratio de hominis dignitate ("God's Address to Adam")
"If you're not an infinite being, what would be the purpose of your life?" — Wayne Dyer, The Power of Intention
What are your beliefs about the nature of the universe? Do you believe in order, universal natural laws, cosmic intelligence, or chaos? Do you believe in the presence of God? What is the importance of attitudes? What is fortune? Is there good or bad fortune? Why do bad things happen to good people? These types of questions come to the mind of almost every human being. One thing we note consistently is that positivity and virtue are universally accepted. Everyone appreciates good conduct such as truthfulness, honesty, speaking politely, and doing well for others. Similarly, bad attitudes and wrong deeds such as dishonesty, theft, and causing harm to others are universally disliked.
Joseph Murphy writes, "As a person thinks, feels, and believes, so is the condition of his or her mind, body, and circumstances" (vxiii). "We are each 100% responsible for all of our experiences," writes Louise Hay. "Every thought we think is creating our future" (You Can Heal Your Life 5). These statements point to the existence of an influential and authoritative self that manifests its desires in alignment with a cooperative, abundant, and intelligent universe. According to this belief, every human being is continuously creating his or her own reality, and the present-day world is the collective creation of humanity. As Deepak Chopra has described, "And when we realize our true Self is one of pure potentiality, we align with the power that manifests everything in the universe" (Seven Spiritual Laws of Success 8).
This paper is an exploration of the potential of the universal law of attraction for the benefit of humanity. It discusses how this law is useful in interpersonal communications and relationships — not only in close personal relations but also in intercultural communication.
Need for the Law of Attraction in the Modern Era
The law of attraction is more needed in the modern era than in any previous era because, with the advancement of telecommunication and technology, the world has become a global village. There are many benefits of globalization: economically, it accelerates the free flow of goods, services, investment, and labor. World trade expanded steadily throughout the 1990s at a rate of more than 6% per annum, exceeding growth in world output by a wide margin (UNCTAD, 2003, p. 41). The five-year annual growth of world foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and outflows increased from 20.0% during 1991–1995 to 40.1% during 1996–2000 (UNCTAD, 2002, p. 4). As a result, the global economy has taken the shape of a single global market consisting of a vast network of regional and local markets.
In terms of its political aspect, globalization has transformed the traditional concept of national sovereignty. The increasing power of global treaties and negotiations — such as the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) — and major international organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) means that domestic issues can no longer be fully managed within the borders of nation-states. As a result, the power of nation-states as sovereign actors in international relations has been significantly undermined.
Yet globalization has also produced many harmful effects, including wars and widespread hatred based on language, color, and racial differences. There are gross violations of human rights, such as deliberate acts of genocide and other war crimes. Moreover, some of the most serious harms the global community faces are the result of ordinary, decent people engaging in "business as usual" rather than the result of deliberate brutality or callous indifference. This is because we are often involved in collective harms — harms caused by the combined actions of many individuals — that are not directly caused by our individual actions yet are in some sense dependent upon them.
Conclusion
This paper has discussed the metaphysical law of attraction and its universal implications. There is a pressing need to consider the law of attraction in the modern era because of widespread hatred based on race and religion, and because the world has become increasingly materialistic, with a pervasive drive to accumulate wealth and social status. Humanity faces many serious challenges, including wars and financial crises. The law of attraction can be applied at the individual level in close relationships such as marriage, and at the intercultural level in settings such as diverse work teams. The principle that positive attracts positive holds true across all relationships. We can build strong emotional bonds with life partners, children, siblings, friends, and colleagues by cultivating positivity and discouraging negativity in every relationship.
References
Bassili, J.N. Attitude strength. In W.D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change, Frontiers of social psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2008. pp. 261–286.
Baxter, L.A. & Braithwaite, D.O. Introduction: Meta-theory and theory in interpersonal communication research. In L.A. Baxter & D.O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.
Bochner, S. Cultures in contrast: Studies in cross-cultural interaction. New York, NY: Pergamon, 2007. pp. 220–250.
Cialdini, R.B. Influence: Science and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
Coleman, H.L.K. "Multicultural counseling competencies in a pluralistic society." Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 26(1), 2004. pp. 56–67.
Dana E. Mastro, Ron Tamborini, and Craig R. Hullett, "Linking Media to Prototype Activation and Subsequent Celebrity Attraction: An Application of Self-Categorization Theory." Communication Research 32, 2005: 323–348.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993.
Fincham, F.D. "Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context." Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 2003. pp. 23–27.
Gottman, J.M. Why marriages succeed or fail: What you can learn from the breakthrough research to make your marriage last. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1994. pp. 34–45.
Gottman, J.M. The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1999.
Hogg, Michael A. "Influence and Leadership." In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by S.T. Fiske, Daniel Todd Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey. New York: Wiley, 2010. pp. 1166–1207.
Hovland, Carl I., Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
Kim, H.K., Capaldi, D.M., & Crosby, L. "Generalizability of Gottman and colleagues' affective process models of couples' relationship outcomes." Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 2007. pp. 55–72.
Michael A. Hogg, "Social Identity Theory." In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, ed. Peter J. Burke. Stanford: Stanford Social Sciences, 2006. p. 112.
Montgomery, B.M. "The form and function of quality communication in marriage." Family Relations, 30, 1981. pp. 21–30.
Naff, K., & Kellough, E. "Ensuring employment equity: Are federal diversity programs making a difference?" International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 2003. pp. 1307–1336.
Parween, C.M. "A cross-cultural understanding of work-related beliefs." Human Relations, 39, 2009. pp. 103–117.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 19. New York: Academic Press, 1986. pp. 123–205.
Rashotte, L.S. "Social Influence." In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Volume 9, edited by G. Ritzer and J.M. Ryan. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. pp. 4426–4429.
UNCTAD. Trade and development report, 2003: Capital accumulation, growth and structural change. United Nations, New York & Geneva, 2003.
Zeev Winstok. "The Effect of Social and Situational Factors on the Intended Response to Aggression among Adolescents." The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 2010. pp. 57–76.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.