This paper examines the value-adding potential of arbitrage for Zara, the Spanish fast fashion retailer, as it evaluates expansion into the North American market. The analysis covers Zara's core business model — low-cost designers, rapid inventory turnover, and PDA-driven supply chain communication — and assesses how well these advantages translate into a price differential strategy in the United States. The paper considers competitive threats from established American discount and fashion chains, potential mismatches with American consumer behavior, and Zara's attempts to adapt through standardized store implementation combined with individualized local inventory responses. The conclusion weighs whether arbitrage remains a viable growth lever in a saturated and regionally diverse US retail landscape.
Arbitrage is defined as the practice of capitalizing upon a price differential that exists between two markets (Business Dictionary, 2010). The Spanish-based clothing retailer Zara has built its business model upon volume-based trade in inexpensive clothing. Zara stocks only a few in-demand items at a time, so its inventory levels exhibit a high rate of turnover. The company uses couture-inspired designs made from inexpensive fabrics, produced as cheaply as possible by young, largely unknown Spanish designers. It also offers a small range of sizes with many color choices for the same trendy item, which suits the young, fit, fashion-conscious Zara consumer.
Young people who buy fashionable, cheap, and disposable clothing are Zara's most loyal customers, although older women may supplement their wardrobes with wallet-friendly Zara pieces and accessories. This model of high-turnover, low-cost fashion — commonly called fast fashion — underlies Zara's competitive positioning and informs its potential arbitrage strategy as it considers entering new markets.
In keeping with its youthful, technology-forward image, Zara employs digital tools to maximize profitability in the highly competitive fashion industry. Designers work quickly, and to avoid stocking out-of-style items, Zara's central headquarters maintain constant contact with all of its retail locations through PDAs that track both customer comments and sales data. Overstocking unwanted designs would force the company to sell clothing at a heavy loss.
As Ferdows, Lewis, and Machuca (2005) explain: "The constant flow of updated data mitigates the so-called bullwhip effect — the tendency of supply chains (and all open-loop information systems) to amplify small disturbances. A small change in retail orders, for example, can result in wide fluctuations in factory orders after it is transmitted through wholesalers and distributors. In an industry that traditionally allows retailers to change a maximum of 20 percent of their orders once the season has started, Zara lets them adjust 40 to 50 percent. In this way, Zara avoids costly overproduction and the subsequent markdowns prevalent in the industry." This real-time, responsive supply chain is central to Zara's competitive advantage and its ability to exploit cost differentials across markets.
Zara is considering moving into the North American market, seeking to leverage its lower-cost Spanish designers, production facilities, and input costs to arbitrage the price differential between Spain and the United States. However, North America is already heavily saturated with discount clothing retailers, ranging from large-format American chains such as Target and Walmart, to fashion-focused stores for young women like Express and Forever 21, to deeply discounted outlets like Marshalls and T.J. Maxx.
As Lessard (2008, p. 16) notes, "In the generally more price-sensitive North American and Asian markets, it is unlikely that the current strategy of leveraging the comparatively low cost of Spain to charge a premium in other European markets to support expansion will be transferable." In addition, the low-cost UK chain Topshop and the European clothing retailer H&M had recently established a presence in the United States, creating direct early competition for Zara in its target market segment.
"US consumers may reject Zara's intentional stock-out strategy"
"Spanish cost advantages may not translate to the US context"
"Standardized stores plus local inventory customization as solution"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.