Essay Topic Hub

Murder
Essays

3,388+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

3,388 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
About This Topic

Murder is one of the most studied subjects across criminology, law, history, and literature courses because it sits at the intersection of human behavior, social structures, and legal systems. Students encounter it in criminal justice programs examining homicide statutes and case law, in history courses tracing notorious killings like the murder of Helen Jewett, and in literature courses analyzing dramatic works such as murder in the cathedral as poetic drama. Its academic weight comes from the way a single act of killing ripples outward — touching questions of evidence, intent, justice, and the fragile boundaries society draws around human life.

The papers archived on this topic reflect a genuinely wide range of approaches. Legal and case-study analyses dominate a significant portion, with writers working through substantive criminal law, Alabama criminal code, Idaho common law, and case precedents to examine how statutes define and prosecute killing. Historical and narrative approaches appear as well, reconstructing specific crimes and their social contexts. Other papers take a social or psychological angle, exploring how murder affects victims' families, how figures like Holmes exerted power over victims, how juvenile justice systems respond to homicide, and how diversity intersects with patterns of crime.

A strong essay on murder needs a tightly scoped thesis — arguing about a specific legal standard, a documented case, or a defined social consequence rather than making broad claims about violence in general. Evidence drawn from case law, primary historical sources, or documented forensic detail such as fingerprint analysis carries the most weight. The most common pitfall is conflating moral judgment with legal or analytical argument; keeping those registers distinct signals academic rigor and strengthens the overall case.

3,388 papers
Sort by:
Paper High School
Hla Hart and Modern Legal Positivism
HLA Hart and Modern Legal Positivism H.L.A. Hart is a famous legal thinker who examined Positivism and Utilitarianism. Hart is noted for thoughts that modernized the thinking of positivists and specifically utilitarians. The key concept of "Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals" is that sometimes law intersects with morality. For example, until people become like giant land crabs with shells that cannot be penetrated and who can get their food from the air and not be harmed by others, there must be laws against violence and setting basic property rights. Hart believes that those laws "intersect" with morality and every legal system has laws like that. Hart believes that the old positivists, who saw law that is completely separate from law that ought to be, were mistaken. Hart also specifically examined the Utilitarianism of Austin and Bentham. Austin and Bentham were both Utilitarians. They believed in no connection between the law that is and the law that ought to be and that it is only a coincidence if legal rights and moral rights are connected. At the same time: Austin believed that if a human law conflicts with divine law, then the human law is not really a law and does not need to be obeyed; Bentham believed the same thing but did not use God or the divine; he used utilitarian principles instead. Because they were Utilitarians, Austin and Bentham believed in a social philosophy of liberalism in law and government, reform, and control of power because even reformers might corrupt the law. Hart admired the simplicity of Austin and Bentham but disagreed with the severe way they separated the law that is from the law that ought to be. Hart says that sometimes there is an intersection between laws and morals. Hart also criticizes their belief that law is essentially a command from a sovereign that is habitually obeyed because they can command obedience but do not need to obey. Hart says that the law does not work that way: legislators do not hold office long enough to be habitually obeyed sovereigns; the laws passed by the legislature must still obey fundamental rules.
Essay Doctorate
Women's Conflicting Roles in Shakespeare's Othello
This order explores the role of women in one of Shakespeare's greatest tragedies, Othello. The order examines the conflict seen in the play, as feminist and antifeminist themes are explored through the lives and actions of the characters. On the one hand, the ideal image of a woman is the one who submits herself to her husband as property, as Desdemona does. Yet, Shakespeare presents a much different type of woman in Emilia, who refuses to bow down to the evil nature of her own husband.
Essay Doctorate
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, PD-0307-09
¶ … court of criminal appeals of Texas, PD-0307-09 Ronald Wilson, and appellant v the State of Texas. (CCA (a), n. d.) The court of Appeals case was: 04-07-00737-CR, and was affirmed.
Research Paper Doctorate
Adolescent depression: causes, symptoms, and treatment approaches
Teen depression is a serous condition that has been largely ignored until recent events in the media focused more attention to the seriousness of the problem. This research examines the attitudes and past research…
Research Paper Doctorate
Monster Motivations and Heroism in Beowulf Explained
¶ … Old English poem Beowulf offers a number of contrasts in telling the story of the hero Beowulf and his fight to save a community not his own first from the monster Grendel and then from Grendel's mother.
Thesis Doctorate
Diversion Programs vs. Imprisonment
Does the criminal justice system work? This is a very interesting question indeed? Many proponents of system believe it to be a deterrent to manner would be criminals across the United States. However, many pundits point to high profile cases of Trayvon Martin or Emmett Till to show the inequities inherent within the criminal justice system (Crowe, 2012). Proponents for the criminal justice system believe that it is a deterrent for others who are thinking about committing egregious crimes in the future. They also believe it provides closure for those who have been innocently wronged by the death of a loved one. These individuals usually believe in the principle of, "An eye for an eye," in regards to life. The general principle that is fundamental to the argument for the criminal justice system is retribution. The belief is that all guilty individuals must be punished. The punishment should correspond to the severity of the crime in all instances irrespective of the circumstances that govern the act. In the case of murder, the individual should be punished with the death penalty. This argument states that real justice requires people to suffer for their wrongdoing, and to suffer in a way appropriate for the crime (Gardner 1978). These supporters believe is ethical as the crime and the punishment correspond with each other based on severity.
Research Paper Doctorate
Leadership Analysis Historical Context Saddam
Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Alnahyan short biography
Research Paper Doctorate
Beowulf: themes and literary analysis
The heroic code of comitatus, as it manifests itself in the story of Beowulf, relates to the mutual respect and obligation between a ruler or leader and his followers (Tierney-Hynes).
Research Paper Doctorate
Brutus in Julius Caesar Brutus -- Hero
In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, a conquering hero is assassinated because he is about to be crowned Emperor in Rome, and members of the Senate do not want to see their power reduced.
Research Paper Doctorate
Legalization of Prostitution Many Believe
Many believe that the world's oldest profession, prostitution, should be legalized and the arguments appear justified.