This has been especially true in China and other Asian countries during the past several decades of economic expansion in that region of the world (Bai et al. 2008). Government stakeholders in many of these countries have benefited along with corporations in obscure and outright false financial statements and analyses as they have attracted money form foreign as well as domestic investors an enabled national growth for many Asian nations (Bai et al. 2008). These investors, on the other hand, as well as many private citizens in these countries, have suffered avoidable losses and unnecessary economic disruptions when the misleading reporting and analysis practices are brought to light and the truth is revealed (Bai et al. 2008). In the United States, the problem is possibly even more complex. More stringent government oversight supposedly limits issues of outright deception, but questionable and obfuscating techniques are still rampant in financial analysis in this country (Gauthier 2004). Many of the government regulatory offices and legislation also have very little real power in appropriating documentation of statements made on financial reports or supporting/outlining methods used by various firms and analysts in their analyses (Gauthier 2004). The recently released tape of Bernard Madoff's conversations regarding the SEC reflect this fact, and some government regulations might actually only complicate matters as various "suggestions on improved communications" and...
Smaller organizations ten to follow regulations more closely simply because there is les room to hide or "creatively shift" balances around, and analysts can therefore hold them to stricter standards and make competition more difficult.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now