Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Actions Lawsuits in Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits: When are they Appropriate?
The class action lawsuit is a somewhat controversial tool, particularly in the case of employment discrimination. In many ways, it is a hallmark of judicial efficiency. After all, if a number of plaintiffs have the same claim against a defendant, it is inefficient to try the same case a number of times. Moreover, later plaintiffs may be unable to recover if earlier plaintiffs exhaust a defendant's financial resources. Therefore, if a company has an employment policy that is facially discriminatory, or has a readily-provable and consistent disparate impact, class-action litigation can be appropriate. However, in many ways the class actions lawsuit is not well-suited for employment discrimination lawsuits. Employment discrimination, particularly gender-based employment discrimination, is frequently subtle and a finding of discrimination is not going to be based on company policies, but on the treatment of a particular individual. Moreover, it seems that unscrupulous employers find ways to evade anti-discrimination laws, which have also been eroded through some subsequent legislation. "There is a reason that the field of labor and employment law -- both as an academic subject and as an arena of social life -- has declined. That is that the labor and employment laws do not address the concerns or vulnerabilities of the majority of the workforce today" (Stone, 2008).
While the use of this class action mechanism is meant to remedy that inequality, it seems to do so at the expense of the basic proposition of judicial fairness, not only for defendants, but for many of the class members. For example, if a company has discriminatory policies but the plaintiff did not experience gender discrimination, then there is no basis for recovery. These are all important factors to consider when looking at the efficacy of the class action lawsuit in employment discrimination lawsuits, and they all played a role in the Supreme Court's recent decision not to allow certification of the class of all female Wal-Mart employees from a particular time period in an employment discrimination lawsuit against the company.
In June, 2011, the Supreme Court reversed a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and blocked a class action sex-discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in favor of class certification under FRCP 23(b)(2). The case was filed in 2000 by Betty Dukes, who filed a sex discrimination lawsuit alleging that she was denied the training she needed to advance in the organization and that this discrimination was based on her gender. The plaintiffs alleged that this type of gender-based discrimination was pervasive in the organization and sought to represent 1.6 million women, including all those who work or have previously worked at Wal-Mart since December 26, 1998. The Supreme Court ruled in Wal-Mart's favor, based on the theory that the plaintiffs did not have sufficient things in common to constitute a class. This decision did not mean that women who experienced discrimination could not sue Wal-Mart. However, it did mean that "each member of the class will need to obtain a lawyer to represent her pursue her claim individually against the retailing behemoth" (McKinney, 2011).
One of the more interesting concepts in employment discrimination lawsuits is whether or not class actions are an appropriate way to handle gender discrimination lawsuits. In fact, there is some suggestion that the use of class actions in employment discrimination lawsuits may be seen, by some, as an inappropriate means of contravening the purpose and design of the civil rights lawsuits. "The rules that governed employment discrimination were drafted with an eye to make sure that every case of employee termination or transfer did not become the source of a civil rights action. The goal was to create a regime in which the admitted cases of overt and invidious discrimination could no longer go unpunished" (Epstein, 2003). Of course, employment discrimination lawsuits rapidly expanded beyond the initial scope. "Arguments that certain forms of discrimination were cost-justified (e.g. differential employment because women had higher risk rates than men) were rejected even though these forms of discrimination count as rational (e.g. cost justified) to the economist. At the same time, proof of motive and intention yielded to disparate impact suits,…[continue]
"Actions Lawsuits In Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits When" (2012, January 26) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/actions-lawsuits-in-employment-sex-discrimination-77686
"Actions Lawsuits In Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits When" 26 January 2012. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/actions-lawsuits-in-employment-sex-discrimination-77686>
"Actions Lawsuits In Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits When", 26 January 2012, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/actions-lawsuits-in-employment-sex-discrimination-77686
Sex Discrimination in the Workplace Salomon Smith Barney is one of the world's largest financial brokerage groups, with headquarters in New York City and 500 offices serving more than 100 countries around the world. Recent studies indicate that the financial industry as a whole continues many practices that are discriminatory to women, such as unequal pay as well and discriminatory hiring and promotion practices. This paper examines whether a gender gap
Discrimination against the elderly, against pregnant women, against women with children, against people of color are all prohibited under the law. The EEOC or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to administer Title VII of the Civil Rights act and specifically to "progress race, national origin, religious, and sex discrimination claims pursuant to the statue" (Gregory, 2003). Is the EEC doing its job? During the first year alone after
Discrimination in the Fire Service Over time, nearly every profession once considered the exclusive province of men (and in the case of the United States, white men) has gradually been made accessible to minorities, whether through practical necessity, changing cultural standards, or court orders. However, this process has proceeded unevenly, so that even now there remains institutionalized discrimination which serves to preclude women and other minorities from the same opportunities as
The employer has an established protocol for dealing with allegations of sexual harassment, and a sexual harassment complaint triggers protections for the employee. An employee engaging in sexual harassment of any other employees, clients, or business associates of the employer, will be disciplined. Any employee engaging in sexual harassment who has been notified by the victim, a supervisor, or any other employee of the employer, that such conduct is
Looking at the claims of John Doe and the possible defenses by ABC Science as an attorney, I would recommend that the company reach some type of settlement with Mr. Doe allowing him to retain a position within the company. His claim under the ADA appears to be very strong and supported by the facts. An adverse decision could be damaging to the company, not only financially, but also from
Discrimination and Affirmative Action "Firefighting is a skilled job where all of the skills learned are on the job… It's a really good job, and it's been racially exclusive in most of our major cities…" (John Payton, NAACP) (Liptak, 2009, The New York Times) Workplace issues that revolve around racial fairness and racial justice typically are highly charged with passion and contentiousness. The now notorious case of the Caucasian firefighters in New
Employment laws encompasses various laws, administrative means and precedents that describe the rights of people who are working in an organization and also restrictions between an employer and employee relationship. According to Blog 2006, these laws are vital as they help the government in achieving its goal of ensuring that the rights of its citizens are well observed. The laws are laid down to prevent employees from being mistreated by