Bowling For Columbine By Michael Moore Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
913
Cite

Bowling for Columbine What makes America such a violent nation? Why have massacres involving guns become commonplace in American society? In his 2002 documentary titled "Bowling for Columbine," Michael Moore explores the many aspects of American society in an attempt to answer why American society is so violent. Moore takes a hard look at a society in which fear permeate people's lives and the intense and violent reaction that is a result of it. In its exploration of an answer to why Americans are a violent people, "Bowling for Columbine" raises a number of very interesting questions that get to the heart of why two students from a middle class Colorado neighborhood went on a shooting spree in their high school.

On April 20, 1999 Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, two high school seniors at Columbine High School, walked into their school and committed a massacre that resulted in thirteen deaths and scores injured. Michael Moore, in his documentary "Bowling for Columbine," uses the tragedy as a backdrop for an exploration of violence in America. The film Moore raises a number of questions that pierce the silence surrounding the epidemic of violence in America. In the opening sequence of the film, Moore opens an account at a bank where he is given a rifle as a free gift, posing the question of what is the connection between money and guns? A question that...

...

The fact that the two students who attacked their high school were social outcasts brings up a number of other questions such as what is the cause of troubled youths in America? As well as how do non-conformists fit into American society? In an interview with Trey Parker, creator of the hugely successful "South Park" cartoon, Parker poses the query of how so-called "losers" fit into a society that is "painfully normal?" (39:30)
In an attempt to answer these questions the film transitions into a discussion involving the prevalence of violence in American foreign policy. The film explores whether or not there a connection between the American government's use of violence around the world and violence in American society, and in which direction the influence may be directed. After all, American society is permeated with violent films, television, music, and many other things but so too are other modern industrialized nations. Moore asks what is the difference between the U.S. And other nations that makes American so violent. He then explores the question of the connection between fear and violence in American society asking where does fear originate? This leads to the question of whether or not he media is culpable in sowing the seeds of fear in order to promote themselves. Does the media promote racism, for…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Moore, Michael. "Bowling for Columbine (2002)." YouTube. 3 Sept. 2013. Web 10 Oct.

2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-yio27C7Y8


Cite this Document:

"Bowling For Columbine By Michael Moore" (2013, October 11) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bowling-for-columbine-by-michael-moore-124321

"Bowling For Columbine By Michael Moore" 11 October 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bowling-for-columbine-by-michael-moore-124321>

"Bowling For Columbine By Michael Moore", 11 October 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bowling-for-columbine-by-michael-moore-124321

Related Documents
Michael Moore
PAGES 15 WORDS 4482

Michael Moore so Controversial? Michael Moore was born in 1954 in Flint, Michigan -- "the home of the wealthiest corporation in the world: General Motors." (Roger and Me, 1989). The tragic plight of this once economically booming, blue-collar city is the basis for much of his filmmaking; and it is what formed the foundation for his particular outlook on the state of American society. The theme of corporate abuse and

Michael Moore's Bowling For Columbine Michael Moore's motion picture Bowling for Columbine provides insight into the Columbine High School Massacre Event in 1999 and into a series of incidents such as the U.S.' tendency to promote weapons and conflict. This film attempts to provide information with regard to the background of gun use in the U.S. And the consequences associated with this respective enterprise. The film is meant to generate controversy

Institutionalized Violence On the other hand, it does not make sense to focus so much on the availability of firearms, simply because most violent crimes involving firearms are committed with illegal firearms and not legally owned and possessed weapons (Dershowitz, 2002). Moore himself comes to the conclusion that, if anything, the American obsession with guns is more a symptom than a cause of the complex social and cultural reasons for higher

Capitalism: A Love Story Michael Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story Michael Moore is an expert at tugging on viewer's heart strings, and never passes up an opportunity to do so in Capitalism: A Love Story -- even though the docu-tragi-comedy would have been better without so much bathos. Moore's main problem lies where it always does: with him focusing the camera on humanity's tragedies and milking them for all their worth. It

Climate Change and the Hijacking of the Green MovementIntroductionThe Michael Moore produced 2019 documentary Planet of the Humans, directed by Jeff Gibbs, raised important questions, concerns and points about one of the most pressing issues in the climate change topic, which is the extent to which renewable energy is safe for the environment. The documentary surprised many because Moore is known for leaning left in his politics, yet the documentary

The clearly unscripted dialogue between Moore and the spokesperson (Moore must return several times to get any satisfaction and the Kmart spokesperson stutters and clearly is just unconvincingly rehearsing the company line) gives the viewer a sense that history is happening in the 'here and now' of the film, just as the viewer watched the security footage of the massacre at the high school. Eventually, Kmart agrees to no