Break Out of War in Afghanistan and essay

Download this essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from essay:

break out of war in Afghanistan and Iraq propelled alarming forecasts about its most likely psychiatric effects. The chief of recuperation or readjustment therapy services at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) asserted that as high as 30% of soldiers deployed to Iraq may establish posttraumatic tension ailment (PTSD) (Dentzer, 2003), a disorder that can arise following experience of gruesome, dangerous occasions, such as battle, natural catastrophes, and rape. PTSD patients do not simply remember their injury; they reexperience it as vibrant sensory recollections (flashbacks), horror stories, and invasive ideas. They feel reduced or small and mentally detached from the family, friends and loved ones, yet likewise stressful, cranky, and hyper-vigilant as if risk were permanently present.

Psychiatry ratified the PTSD medical diagnosis in 1980, mainly in feedback to the belated awareness of its signs in Vietnam veterans whose troubles had actually long been improperly comprehended and dealt with. Undoubtedly, the most strenuous epidemiological research ever before done on Vietnam veterans had actually reported that 30.9% of guys who served in this war established PTSD (Kulka et al., 1990), consequently laying a basis for very early forecasts about PTSD amongst Iraq veterans. Keen to stay clear of the errors of the Vietnam period, American, British, and Dutch governments introduced epidemiological studies analyzing the mental wellness of soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, intending to determine the frequency of PTSD and allow its very early detection and therapy.

The Epidemiology of PTSD

Some years later, the information of PTSD, and its ramifications turn out to be remarkably positive. The wars have definitely triggered PTSD, however at rates far lower than lots of prior conflicts had and thus lower than the overall rates that were actually anticipated. The most methodologically sound studies have actually evaluated multitudes of military workers (or veterans) arbitrarily tested from the total populace of American and British soldiers who have actually served in Iraq and Afghanistan. These researches reveal that the proportion of soldiers that have actually established PTSD varies from 2.1% to 13.8%. (Sundin et al., 2010).

The most extensive research on American soldiers is the United States Millennium Cohort research, a population-based, longitudinal examination of active service and Reserve/National Guard workers (Smith et al., 2008). It includes arbitrary samples agent of the sub-populace of deployed war veterans and soldiers, alongside the deployed non-combatants, and non-deployed non-combatants. For this reason, it stays clear of the predispositions related to ease samples or from samples drawn from those looking for therapy. In addition, the topics were without PTSD at baseline, consequently offering quotes of PTSD attributable to military injury alone, not to trauma taking place prior to a soldier's enlistment in the service. Evaluating 47,837 participants of the Armed Forces, the analysts discovered that 4.3% of workers deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq established PTSD. Amongst deployed workers, 7.6% of those sample respondents reporting fight exposure established the condition, whereas 1.4% experienced this amongst those reposndents who were not experiencing battle. Of those who had actually never ever been deployed overseas, 2.3% established PTSD in feedback to stateside injury (e.g., mishaps on military bases). To be sure, rates of 4.3% amongst all deployed combatants and 7.6% amongst combatants are not unimportant. Yet these figures are much lower than the anticipated figure of 30% for all deployed soldiers, noncombatants along with combatants (Dentzer, 2003; Kulka et al., 1990).

Annotated Bibliography

Article 1: 'World Assumptions and Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder' by Dekel and colleagues (2004)

Summary

Dekel, Rachel; Solomon, Zahava; Elklit, Ask; Ginzburg and Karni investigated the relationship between the

1. Individual world assumptions

2. Combat stress reactions, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and PTSD's itinerary.

The sample was the three groups of Israeli veterans who were divided as follow:

109 veterans who experienced CSR on the combat zone

98 decorated veterans

189 control participants.

Respondents finished homogeneous questionnaires that assessed PTSD and world supposition. Both CSR and severe PTSD were linked with lesser levels of self-esteem and beliefs about the kindness of people. Additionally, Dekel, Rachel; Solomon, Zahava; Elklit, Ask; Ginzburg and Karni saw a linear connection between self-esteem perceptions and levels of mental status. Dekel, Rachel; Solomon, Zahava; Elklit, Ask; Ginzburg and Karni looked at the findings of the study thinking the extraordinary characteristics and sense of warfare.

Assessment and Critique

The approach of the study was a good one as it helped integrate the war veterans' personal opinions, albeit only a part of their personal opinions, with the potential development of PTSD. This provided a good insight on how personal perceptions also influenced easier development of PTSD or how personal perceptions could counter the extent of PTSD. Furthermore, the approach of personal strengths and weaknesses of the individual have rarely been integrated in studies and usually prior experiences are also ignored, but this study was a good approach as it did integrate at least one aspect.

Reflection

This above chosen study could help in the development of this proposed study by helping the researcher understand that the individual structure of eth war veterans must also e taken into account in order to clearly understand the extent of PTSD development amongst them. This proposed study will also thus be able to include a strong perception and support of the integration of personalized factors of war veterans as well.

Article 2: 'The Relationships between Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Clusters and Marital Intimacy Among War Veterans' by Solomon and colleagues (2008)

Summary

This particular research investigated the following:

Connections between the PTSD symptom cluster and the marriage intimacy of the Israeli warfare veterans.

The function of self-disclosure and oral hostility in mediating the effects of PTSD prevention and agitated arousal symptoms on marriage intimacy.

The sample for the study comprised of 219 respondents that were split into 2 main groups:

1. Ex-prisoners of war (ex-POWs; N. 125)

2. Comparison group of veterans who battled in the similar war but were not captivated (N94).

According to the results the Ex-POWs showed superior levels of PTSD symptoms and verbal hostility and inferior levels of self-disclosure as compared to controls. Even though ex-POWs and controls did not vary in level of marital understanding, they did, though, showed a dissimilar pattern of associations between PTSD clusters and understanding.

In ex-POWs, self-disclosure mediated the associations between PTSD avoidance and marital understanding. Verbal violence was also discovered via indirect effect of agitated arousal on marital understanding.

The findings showed the significance of self-disclosure and verbal hostility as interpersonal mechanisms for the associations among posttraumatic symptoms on marital understanding of ex-POWs.

Assessment and Critique

This study was a good approach towards understanding how captive war veterans when captured can have a different form of PTSD as opposed to those war veterans who had not been captured in war or had not been victims of the retaliations of war. This approach is not a common one amongst many studies but could actually provide good comparative grounds for future research and is definitely an area of research that could help in understanding the realms of impact that war veterans have to go through in their normal lives.

Reflection

The above study can help establish a comparative ground for this study as well. It will help the researcher also establish a good understanding of the different types and levels of PTSD that can occur with exposure to different experiences at war. This will add a profound dimension and depth to the paper that only a few prior studies could match.

Article 3: 'Deployment Stressors and Posttraumatic Stress Symptomatology: Comparing Active Duty and National Guard/Reserve Personnel from Gulf War I' by Vogt and colleagues (2008)

Summary

Due to the increased use of the National Guard and Reserve military workers in the present scenario has raised many questions that whether the employment experiences and their relations with posttraumatic strain symptomatology vary for on duty and NG/R military workers.

There are very few studies to date which can be found related to this issue and moreover it is still uncertain that whether the impact of this military status varies for men and women or not. Vogt, Dawne S.; Samper, Rita E.; King, Daniel W.; King, Lynda A and Martin, James A dealt with these study issues in a sample of 311 men and women who were associated with the Gulf war 1.

Numerous dissimilarities were experienced in deployment stressor contacts and results derived from differential relations normally recommended more unconstructive impacts of deployment experiences for on duty females and NG/R men. The probable role of unit consistency in elucidating these findings is also discussed.

Assessment and Critique

The above study follows the approach less implemented by many researchers whereby the impact and extent of PTSD is measured and compared between men and women in the armed forces. This approach gives the study a unique distinction in the sense that it allows the researcher to aptly see the impact of posttraumatic experiences and the coping techniques for men and women during and after their experience at war. Of course PTSD is experienced differently by every individual,…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Break Out Of War In Afghanistan And" (2013, July 27) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/break-out-of-war-in-afghanistan-and-93520

"Break Out Of War In Afghanistan And" 27 July 2013. Web.29 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/break-out-of-war-in-afghanistan-and-93520>

"Break Out Of War In Afghanistan And", 27 July 2013, Accessed.29 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/break-out-of-war-in-afghanistan-and-93520

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • War in Afghanistan Following the

    Fallout A section of commentators have taken issue with the manner in which the federal government denied suspected terrorist the due process of law as stipulated under the constitution. The government even commissioned the establishment of a torture chamber in Guantanamo Bay. This amounts to gross violation of human rights and civil liberties. There is another clause in the patriot act dubbed "enhanced surveillance procedures," which allows federal authorities to gather

  • War and Death When Considering

    This is not to suggest that either the United States or the Soviet Union were necessarily desiring this conflict, because "based on the scattered evidence now available from Soviet archives," Stalin was "wary and reluctant" in his support of the North, and only finally agreed to offer military equipment and advice when it became clear that China would intervene should the Soviet Union fail to offer support (Cumings 144).

  • Afghanistan Economy the Future of

    The majority of the population was left extremely poor, lacking food, clothing, housing and medical care. The economy virtually collapsed..." During this time, any formal financial sector was essentially nonexistent, basic infrastructure was lacking, and a severe drought from 2002-2001 further ravaged the economy (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). During this decade, violence and political instability had a tremendous impact on Afghanistan's economy. Inter-regional trade was greatly disrupted,

  • War the Experience of War Has Changed

    War The Experience of War War has changed greatly in character from the days of knights in shining armor. The concept of a "state" rather than just a regional ruler has changed the dynamic of war. Rather than meeting on a battlefield and duking it out, two armies now willfully attack civilian targets to demoralize a population, cut off trade routes to starve a population, and, if it comes to it, invade

  • War on Terror & Human Rights the

    War on Terror & Human Rights The so-called "war on terror" -- initiated by former president George W. Bush after 9/11 -- has not succeeded in ending terrorism but it opened the door to numerous violations of human rights. A survey of verifiable, peer-reviewed sources in the literature show clearly that the Bush Administration and members of the military under Bush's command carried out human rights violations in the name of

  • Theoretical Perspectives on the War

    Anarchy is but one aspect of the Realist paradigm. Anarchy is the impetus for all other components of the Realist theory to come into play. Elements such as power, security dilemma's, balance of power, polarity and alliances and ultimately war are all outcrops of the existence of any real centralized power and an absence of true legitimacy in the form of a well established, respected, influential central government. Each

  • Impressions of War the Most

    " There is a more calm feeling to his description. This is not to say that the author was portraying war as being a patriotic act, but the author was not as graphical in his describing what the soldiers were seeing and going through. The reader is more connected to the actions of the poem and not the fact that someone is dying. He ends his poem by referencing "hell"


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved