Chinks In The Vaunted Toyota Way Toyota's Case Study

¶ … Chinks in the Vaunted Toyota Way Toyota's dominance of global auto industry has often been attributed to the culture of customer centricity supported by cultural values, systems and processes that permeate the company (Liker, 2003). When cultural values are strong enough, the roles of people, processes they need to manage and systems all combine to make challenging organizational objectives attainable (Nelson, Quick, 2008). The case study illustrates how successfully Toyota has been able to create a scalable, highly effective values-based framework that standardizes processes, eliminating the potential for error. Toyota has defined the intersection of people, processes and systems so they can continually be improved over time, mitigating risk and variation in each area as well. The Toyota Production System (TPS) is the framework that the company relies on for managing its supply chain, coordination, planning and execution throughout its manufacturing operations. Studies of the TPS indicate that the knowledge sharing is so pervasive throughout this loosely coupled framework of suppliers, that it is typical to see intelligence and knowledge transformed into competitive advantage over time (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). Toyota has learned how to transform collaboration and shared task ownership into several significant advantages, including reducing their time-to-market and through cross-supplier collaboration (Liker, 2003). The chinks in the Toyota armor are considered in the case to be from a lack of scalability and agility of the systems, processes and roles that comprise the TPS. The most glaring example of this is an analysis of competitor's cars to the component level where Toyota finds they are superior only 50% of the time, or every other component. That's a mediocre position for the company to be in, and one that requires strategic change to fix.

QUESTION 1. Describe Toyota's culture from the perspective of espoused values and enacted values.

ANSWER: The espoused values of the Toyota culture are captured in the fourteen Toyota Way principles mentioned in the case (Nelson, Quick, 2008) and expanded upon in a related book that explores each of the principles in detail (Liker, 2003). Analyzing the fourteen principles, the five dominant themes of long-term philosophy, the right process producing the right results, adding value to an organization by developing people, and how continuously solving root problems drives organizational learning (Liker, 2003). These five foundations groups illustrate the espoused values of the company and also are shown through analysis to be critical to the formation of the TPS (Liker, 2003) and the capacity of this network to create a knowledge sharing network over time (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). The foundation of the fourteen principles is based on a strong customer-centric culture throughout the company, which is what many consider to be its greatest strength in terms of staying agile or able to transform itself over time (Hannagan, 2004). As with many organizations however, there is a dichotomy or disconnect between espoused values and those that are enacted. The premise of the case study is based on the dichotomy of espoused quality values and the actual results being attained by the TPS and its suppliers (Liker, 2003). While there are many, many factors that contribute to this disconnect, the majority of them are based on processes over time becoming less relevant and useful to customers and the company itself (Davenport, 1992). Losing focus on the customer and their needs can quickly lead to confusion and a myriad of competing objectives and goals over time (Nelson, Quick, 2008). This is what happened to Toyota on the quality and customer-focused dimensions of their business.

QUESTION 2.Using the perspective of the functions of organizational culture, explain the impact of The Toyota Way.

ANSWER: The functions of organizational culture work together to enable greater stability, behavioral control throughout an organization, and also provide a strong sense of identity as well (Nelson, Quick, 2008). Often these three strategic aspects of culture are also defined in terms of the level of cooperation, control, commitment, decision...

...

When these factors are applied to The Toyota Way, it is apparent that the functions of the organizational culture are very effective in galvanizing the many manufacturing, vehicle assembly, and marketing operations into a synchronized strategy to attain strategic plans and goals (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). Organizational culture as exemplified with The Toyota Way has also made it possible for the company to be self-critical of the processes that are not working and need improvement (Davenport, 1992). Kaizen, or continual improvement is a by-product of having an organizational culture honest and open enough to allow for both good and bad news to be communicated clearly and accurately (Liker, 2003). The functions of organizational culture also can dictate the drastic change and improvements are needed (Nelson, Quick, 2008). This is the case with the quality management problems Toyota faces in the context of the case study, and the evidence of 50% of their components being inferior to those of their competitors based on an analysis (Nelson, Quick, 2008). What makes the Toyota Way so innovative is the lack of focus on blaming and scape-goating and the focus instead on how to resolve a very challenging problem through shared communication, collaboration and trust (Liker, 2003).
QUESTION 3. Using the perspective of the effects of organizational culture, explain the impact of The Toyota Way.

ANSWER: The effects of organizational culture based on the fourteen principles of The Toyota Way are foundational to the future growth of the company and set the foundation for trust throughout the company's entire value chain (Liker, 2003). These effects include the ability of the TPS to on-board a supplier and within one year have them so well educated on internal processes they can quickly assist others on the specifics of order management, pricing and managing returns (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). The Toyota Way as a value-based framework for ensuring the TPS continually can scale and stay agile enough in meeting customers' needs without slowing down innovation enabled through cross-supplier communication (Hannagan, 2004). Toyota has also found that the greater the level of trust throughout and between their suppliers, the more galvanizing effect it has on the fourteen principles becoming engrained in their most critical business units as well (Liker, 2003). Trust is the galvanizing force that unifies the To9yota Way together, making it possible to communicate more clearly, accurately and efficiently than would have ever been the case before (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). For Toyota, the challenge is to make the effects of its organizational culture lead to greater resiliency and ability to overcome significant obstacles on the path back to being the world leader in auto manufacturing quality as well. The effects of culture are accumulative and difficult to change, unless there is a strong catalyst or driving force making a company re-evaluate its performance and perspective (Nelson, Quick, 2008). This is exactly what is happening to Toyota today. Their focus needs to be on re-energizing The Toyota Way and making it as effective as possible as a foundation for future growth.

QUESTION 4. What challenges does Toyota face as it attempts to maintain The Toyota Way while pursuing vigorous global expansion?

ANSWER: The greatest challenge will be educating and assimilating new suppliers, partners, employees, and members of the selling and distribution channels into The Toyota Way. Resistance to change is often the single leading cause of company initiatives failing over time (Nelson, Quick, 2008). Toyota will need to guard against this by concentrating on learning opportunities that promote autonomy of employees, mastery of a specific skill set, and purpose of learning to excel at the specific job. These three factors of autonomy, mastery and purpose have continually been shown to be foundational elements in ensuring the TPS stays focused on consistency of results while also ensuring a continual level of improvement (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). Toyota also faces the cultural challenges of operating a business…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Davenport (1992) - Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press. Pp. 42-54. October 1992.

Jeffrey H. Dyer, & Kentaro Nobeoka. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal: Special Issue: Strategic Networks, 21(3), 345-367

Hannagan R (2004). Management Concepts and Practices. London, UK: Financial Times, Prentice Hall . Chapters 7, 11 -- 19 inclusive.

Liker, J (2003). The Toyota Way. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill .


Cite this Document:

"Chinks In The Vaunted Toyota Way Toyota's" (2011, August 28) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/chinks-in-the-vaunted-toyota-way-toyota-51931

"Chinks In The Vaunted Toyota Way Toyota's" 28 August 2011. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/chinks-in-the-vaunted-toyota-way-toyota-51931>

"Chinks In The Vaunted Toyota Way Toyota's", 28 August 2011, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/chinks-in-the-vaunted-toyota-way-toyota-51931

Related Documents

Analysis of Toyota Opportunities and Threats Toyota is the world's leading patent holder in hybrid vehicle technologies, having over 85% of all patents registered in the U.S. Patent Office, in addition to holding over forty different patents in other registries throughout Europe and Asia. This is a formidable platform for growth in this high-growth emerging line of business. Hybrid technologies can reduce carbon emissions by over 60% in the latest engine

Toyota Strategic Management Case (TOYOTA) Strategic Management: Strategy Implementation Strategic Implementation Do you think that the implementation of Toyota's current strategies identified in its 2011 Annual Report and on its web page will help to overcome the public relations difficulties resulting from the recall issues reported by the media in 2010? The current strategies as identified by Toyota in its annual reports and on its website will not be enough in the short-term to reverse

Toyota Strategic Management For decades, Toyota has been one of the most admired companies in the world. They were able to turn their image in the 1960's and 70's from cheap Japanese import to the car of choice for millions of consumers worldwide. Toyota's strategy has varied significantly over the years. The company began by primarily imitating many of its competitor's designs and even used some of its components. Much of

This process improvement is implied in the manufacturing and the upper-level management changes, and should be prioritized as such. Another manufacturing process that Toyota needs to address and which is implicit in the previously mentioned manufacturing process is its increasing propensity to utilize parts suppliers outside of its keiretsu, which loosely translates into headless combination (No author, 2009). Keiretsu is a Japanese term for the tiered hierarchy of additional companies

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. Major Issues in the Case Toyota Motor Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. (TMM) has bypassed their typical response to quality issues known as "jidoka" in a special circumstance regarding seat installation. As opposed to stopping the assembly line and focusing on the underlying root of the problem, in the case of the faulty seats the cars were allowed to continue through the production line with a special marking that

However, certain elements of the Toyota Production System must be re-evaluated, particularly the conception of waste. If the principles of CCC21 and Value Innovation were based on the concept that production materials could be halved because they amounted to waste, those initiatives should be discarded. Ideally, Toyota should utilize 100% of the materials that it used prior to CCC21, when all of its quality issues began. The cost-benefit analysis of