Coke vs Pepsi Among the Research Paper

Download this Research Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Research Paper:

S.A. And other regions, Pepsi has tended to target generation X or the younger generation. This has led to the view that the Pepsi brand and marketing is aimed more at the youth segment of the market; as the slogan "Pepsi generation" would suggest (Comparative Analysis of Pepsi and Coke).

Pepsi has also changed the colors and image of its brand more than Coke, possibly in order to attract the youth market. Pepsi has "…associated itself with rich deep blue color as blue color represents eternal youthfulness and openness that is appropriately consistence with the youth segment they are targeting" "(Mittal et al. 2008). The rationale behind this is that the labeling of the product helps the brand to become accepted by the targeted marketing segment. This difference in segmentation is supported by the view that,

Even with Coke's best-of-breed worldwide distribution system, there always was a feeling that the soda wasn't as connected to the kids as it should be given the beverage's long history and famed reputation for being a valued member of the Americana. (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi)

However, studies also indicate that, "Coke retains a significant advantage over Pepsi in terms of brand equity, and this is evident even with younger people" (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi). Studies also indicate that Coke has the edge over Pepsi in terms of marketing equity: "PepsiCo was valued at $110 billion; Coca-Cola's market cap, on the other hand, was near $140 billion" (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi).

There are also differences with regard to gender-based segmentation of the market. Coco-Cola for example has targeted its beverages with a lighter taste, such as Fanta, towards the female sectors as well as the very young demographic. Another important aspect of brand marketing is the realization of the differences between rural and urban consumer needs. In this regard, Coke is one of the first companies to have realized the importance of the rural markets. One of the differences that have been catered for in regard is price as opposed to quality. It has been found that the population of the rural sector is "…more conscious more about the price whereas the population of Urban sector is more conscious about the quality and brand name of the product" (Mittal, 2008). As a result both Coca Cola and Pepsi have adopted different strategies to market to these sectors of the population.


The Importance of branding is supported by modern science. This refers to the view that the "… preference for Coke vs. Pepsi is not only a matter for the tongue to decide" (Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head). In other words, choosing one brand over another has a lot to do with the perception of what one is drinking, as well as taste. Preference also has been found to be linked to "…memory-related brain regions that recall cultural influences" ( Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head). This means that brand images and their associations affect perceptions and preferences for the product. Choices are affected by perception because "there are visual images and marketing messages that have insinuated themselves into the nervous systems of humans that consume the drinks" (Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head).

In terms of brand image, the Coca-Cola brand tends to dominate the international beverage market. However, there is conjecture about its overall position in relation to Pepsi. One of the reasons for Coca-Cola's apparent advantage over Pepsi is that it has a longer history and therefore that its image and brand is more ensconced in the culture and mind of the consumer. It has also achieved a dominating position as a result of its flexible and effective distribution and marketing system. "Coca-Cola's bottling system is one of their greatest strengths. It allows them to conduct business on a global scale while at the same time maintain a local approach" ( SWOT n Pest Analysis of Nestle and Coca Cola). Pepsi on the other hand has shown a tendency in branding and marketing to engage the younger sector of the consumer market.

Both these market leaders however have to continually be aware of challenges and threats to their brand dominance. Among these is the threat of substitutes that could put pressure on their market share. More significantly, changes in consumer consciousness pose continual challenges to these companies. "Even though Coca-Cola and Pepsi control nearly 40% of the entire beverage market, the changing health-consciousness of the market could have a serious affect" (Coca-Cola Case Study). Health trends or a number of other variables are apects that both Pepsi and Coca- Cola have to be continually aware of.


A Brief Pepsi History. Retrieved from

Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi. Retrieved from

Bettman, et al. (1998) Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer

Research 25(3), pp. 187-217

Brand Equity: Coke vs. Pepsi. Retrieved from

Business Profile. Retrieved from

Case Study Coca Cola strategy. Strategies for Americas, Asia and Africa. Retrieved from

Coca Cola 78. Retrieved from

Coca-Cola Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.***.com/view.asp?id=23720

Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head. Retrieved from

Comparative Analysis of Pepsi and Coke. Retrieved from

Levis D. ( 2005) Marketing Strategy. Retrieved from



SinghK. Marketing communications management. Retrieved from

SWOT n Pest Analysis of Nestle and Coca Cola. Retrieved from



Yogi B. Coca-Cola Magic: 21 Business Lessons. Retrieved from



Wookfolk, Mary E., William Castellan, and Charles I. Brooks. 1983. "Pepsi vs. Coke: Labels, Not Tastes, Prevail." Psychological Reports 52 (February): 185-186.

This picture may vary from region to region.[continue]

Cite This Research Paper:

"Coke Vs Pepsi Among The" (2010, August 30) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from

"Coke Vs Pepsi Among The" 30 August 2010. Web.22 October. 2016. <>

"Coke Vs Pepsi Among The", 30 August 2010, Accessed.22 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Cola Wars Continue Coke and Pepsi in

    Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Harvard Business Case 9-711-462 Five Forces in the cola industry: Porter's Five Forces Framework Power of buyers For concentrate owners: Strong. The power of buyers is extremely strong within the soda industry, given that consumers can quickly shift their alliance from one beverage to another. Also, cola is not strictly a 'necessity' as a product -- no one needs to drink soda, and consumers can easily

  • Marketing Strategies of Coke and Pepsi in Thailand and UK

    marketing strategies of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Thailand and UK Coca-Cola and Pepsi, rated among the top companies in the world share a common fact - for several years, both these companies have been successfully selling a simple product made of water and sugar to almost all countries. This would have been impossible unless the companies were able to create sustained excitement over their products and brands among the people

  • Pepsico vs Coca Cola Pepsico vs Cocacola

    Pepsico vs. Coca Cola Pepsico vs. CocaCola The purpose of this essay is to present the comparative analysis of two companies CocaCola and PepsiCo. The main objective of the essay is to compare and analyze financial performance of two companies in terms of ratios. CocaCola is 126 years old company was created by Atlanta pharmacist John Pemberton in 1886. It has 3500 growing products available in 200+ countries. CocaCola receives 1,322,000 tweets per

  • Marketing of Atkins Diet Products in Europe vs The US

    Marketing of Atkins Diet Products in Europe vs. The U.S. Background on Atkins Diet (A) Who was Robert Atkins? Atkins was born in Columbus, in the state of Ohio in the year 1930. After having joined the University of Michigan, he graduated with a Major in Pre-meds, after which Atkins received his Medical Degree in the year 1955 from the Cornell University Medical School. By the year 1959, he had finished his residencies

  • Advertisnig Advertising Branding Ourselves to

    Inside can be found museum-like dioramas, a theater, a cafe, a doll hair salon, and lounging areas designed to facilitate interaction among shoppers and the examination and use of products" (Diamond 2009, p.119). Diamond et al. (2009) argues that entertainment brands, such as American Girl, the Disney store have a unique power as brands, not simply to encourage consumers to buy the product, but also to foster consumer creativity, and

  • Financial Comparison Financial Analysis Is a Tool

    Financial Comparison Financial analysis is a tool that allows third parties to analyze corporate financial statements. One of the main reasons that the Securities and Exchange Commission requires that statements are compiled and presented in a consistent manner is to ensure that third parties will be able to use the statements to compare different companies. These comparisons can, among other things, help with investment decisions. This paper will compare PepsiCo and

  • Operational Effectiveness Fully Explain the Two Statements Quotes

    Operational Effectiveness Fully explain the two statements/quotes below and why they are true. In the answer explain what is meant by "operational effectiveness" (first quote) and fit and sustainability (second quote). Please explain as if you are speaking top managers around the corporate office for them to realize how our company is going to achieve true competitive excellence and not settle for mediocrity. First quote: "Constant improvement in operational effectiveness is necessary

Read Full Research Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved