Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The firms seek to benefit from whatever a partner has to offer. This is different because size of the firms does not matter as long as each is willing to support the other in mutually beneficial manner. Unlike U.S. collaboration units where financial assistance plays a critical role, in Japan, it is the infrastructure that matters.
Unlike the U.S. conglomerates, which accent financial management, Keiretsu are oriented to cooperate in accord with whatever contribution a family member can make to help the other family member. Business units may be cooperating as suppliers of parts, lenders of capital, contributors of production know-how, or providers of access to markets. All these happen quietly. It takes a lot of digging to find out who is supplying what to whom. Even then, many of the arrangements cannot be uncovered. Most of the agreements will never be known. Keiretsu behavior epitomizes cooperation based on mutual advantage. Keiretsus actively seek out joint ventures with a broad range of partners, all over the world. (Starr: 146)
Similar collaborations are found in other countries as well such as South Korea where inter-firm collaboration is called Chaebols. Interesting close connection between partners is possible in other countries but not in the U.S. where anti-trust laws make it almost impossible to foster deeper connections. This also brings us to the question: why collaboration among competitors is more successful in Japan than it is in the U.S. Foreign competition is what prompted many firms in the U.S. To go global and join other successful firms for various ventures. But in the area of high technology, Japanese firms are still far ahead of the U.S. firm which had once been the dominant player in the industry. The reduced market share of European and U.S. firms in the last two decades caused serious concern. But while collaborations are mushrooming all over the country, they are still not very successful and dissatisfaction level is high. Critics believe that it is the institutional structure, which is contributing to success of collaboration in Japan and the failure of the same in the U.S. Ouchi and Bolton [1988, p 12] argue that, "a society which fails to fully provide the help for the creation of multi-firm industry collaboratives will suffer in global competition with a society which is more completely equipped with a range of institutional forms."
The industry structure in Japan is significantly different from the one present in the U.S. In Japan firms are usually owned by some entity other than the firm itself. These are usually the insurance companies and financial institutions. There is a collective structure where all firms can share information, knowledge for standardization of products and services. This allows for greater collaboration and trust. In the 80s decade when U.S. was losing its dominance in microelectronics industry due to greater fragmentation [Jorde & Teece 1989], Japan was consolidating its position by allowing firms to benefit from latest research conducted through research consortia, such as the VLSI Technology Research Association.
Thus while collaboration is increasing, it is not always either successful or satisfactory within the industrial and economic framework of U.S. businesses. The firms measures success in terms of sales growth because these sales indicate profitability and when this indicator is missing, the collaboration is seen as a failure. Another major problem is that of trust, which U.S. legal framework fails to eradicate. In fact, if anything, the current anti-trust laws only add to the air of mistrust among competitors while collaborating. There have been some successful collaboration but normally the issues of adapting with another firm and its culture have always been there and they continue to hinder the progress of collaborations in the country.
Astley, W.G. 1984. Toward an appreciation of collective strategy. Academy of Management Review, 9: 526-535.
Jorde, T.M. And D.J. Teece. 1989. Competition and cooperation: striking the right balance. California Management Review, Spring: 25-37.
Ouchi, W.G. And M.K. Bolton. 1988. The logic of joint research and development. California Management Review, Spring: 9-33.
Parkhe, a. 1993. The structuring of strategic alliances: A game-theoretic and transaction-cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 794-829. Porter, M.E. 1981. Competitive advantage, New York, NY: The Free Press.
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
M.K. Starr, Global Corporate alliances and the competitive edge (Westport: Quorum Books, 1991)
Sanford V. Berg and Philip Friedman, "Joint Ventures in American Industry," Mergers and Acquisitions (Summer 1978)
Edgar Herzfeld, (1983) Joint Ventures. Jordan & Sons.
Coopers & Lybrand and Yankelovich, Skelly and White, Inc. (1984) Collaborative Ventures: A Pragmatic Approach to Business Expansion in the Eighties. Coopers & Lybrand.
Williamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296.
Management Monograph No. 54, Recent Experience, p.…[continue]
"Collaboration Among Competitors Global Economy" (2007, February 09) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/collaboration-among-competitors-global-economy-40152
"Collaboration Among Competitors Global Economy" 09 February 2007. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/collaboration-among-competitors-global-economy-40152>
"Collaboration Among Competitors Global Economy", 09 February 2007, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/collaboration-among-competitors-global-economy-40152
Global Business When businesses go international, they have to operate in a more competitive, uncertain, and risky business environment. The forces present in the Global environment bring a number of challenges for the businesses; making it more difficult for them to maintain their market share, enhance profitability, and keep the customers satisfied (Cherunilam, 2007). To compete successfully and ensure a sustainable future in the international markets, business organizations have to analyze
Singapore Economy Singapore: Looking Back to the Past for Answers to the Future Looking Backwards According to the Singapore Ministry of Finance the world economy has created a challenging environment for growth in any nation. However, despite these challenges, the Singapore economy has averaged 5% growth per year over the past decade. The Singapore economy has experienced a deep recession over the last two years, but still continued to manage at least minimal
(Moeller 4) While the investors preview at buying stocks, among the various other matters, they concentrate on 'price/earnings ratio'. Simple arithmetic proves that 1.2 billion people existing in China along with an yearly economic rate of growth of around 10% in the coming years, the enhance in the purchasing power will be of a great dimension which has not yet been visualized. In addition to this about 1 billion Indians
Education for Economy Theory as it Relates to Adult Education In an economy motivated by improvement and information, in marketplaces betrothed in powerful opposition and steady regeneration, in a world of incredible chances and risks, in a culture facing multifaceted business, political, scientific, technological, health and environmental challenges, and in diverse workplaces and neighborhoods that center on mutual associations and social networking, the cleverness, nimbleness and skills of the American people
Because the home country is not required to reimburse foreign depositors for losses, there is no corresponding financial penalty for lax supervision; there is, though, a benefit to the country with lenient regulatory policies because of increased revenues generated and the employment opportunities these services provide (Edwards 1999). Furthermore, banks seeking to conduct multinational business are attracted to countries where incorporation laws and the regulatory framework offer less regulatory oversight
Intelligence Community Many divergent global forecasts relating to the Intelligence Community have been fronted where relative harmony dominates market economies and democracies but the use of military force is diminishing among internationally relating nations. This is driven by rising political, military and economic competition along the borders of major culture and civilization, increasing the breakdown of order as states implodes, rogue states arming themselves with unconventional weaponry and competition among multiple
Therefore, this study is significant because it explores a very important channel of marketing and communication in the B2B market. The study is important for a second reason that international trade is becoming a cause for concern after the global recession. The economies of various countries have been affected after a decline in their purchasing power. It is said that economic recovery is possible through an increase in trade and