Criminal Justice - Hostage Negotiation Thesis

PAGES
2
WORDS
573
Cite

The secondary negotiator is also responsible for maintaining a more detached perspective than the primary and helping the primary remain objective and uninvolved on a personal psychological level (Schmalleger, 2008; Wind, 1995). One of the primary tools employed by hostage negotiators are information obtained about the underlying motives and psychological makeup of the hostage takers because that understanding enables them to structure their negotiating posture in the manner most conducive to achieving a positive outcome. Hostage negotiators also rely on the bidirectional effect of the Stockholm phenomenon, according to which a psychological connection develops between hostages and hostage takers. In the case of hostages, this is not particularly helpful to negotiators, but as it pertains to hostage takers, the Stockholm syndrome is very helpful because it often results in the development of empathy for the hostages which greatly facilitates a positive outcome (DeFabrique, Romano, & VanHasselt, 2007).

Hostage...

...

Ultimately, hostage negotiators employ these tools in combination to achieve a successful resolution.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Butler, W.M., Leitenberg, H., and G.D. Fuselier. "The Use of Mental Health Professional

Consultants to Police Hostage Negotiation Teams," Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11 (1993): 213-221.

DeFabrique, N., Romano, S.J., and VanHasselt, V.B. "Understanding Stockholm

Syndrome," FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July 2007, 10-15.


Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice - Hostage Negotiation" (2009, February 17) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-hostage-negotiation-24730

"Criminal Justice - Hostage Negotiation" 17 February 2009. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-hostage-negotiation-24730>

"Criminal Justice - Hostage Negotiation", 17 February 2009, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-hostage-negotiation-24730

Related Documents

D.). Armed robbery is an offense carried out while in possession of a drawn weapon like gun despite of whether it was fired or not. Plea negotiation or bargaining is usually conducted in order to lessen trial expense and involves the provision of a lesser sentence by the prosecutor in exchange for admission of guilt. Pre-trial conference involves discussions between the defense, prosecutor, and judge to ascertain the need for

Prosecutors consider several factors. For effective prosecution to take place there should be the required selected readings, methodology and analysis of the findings of the case (Siegel 2012). A standard case set is also crucial since it is a tool used for decision making in the criminal justice system. These tools enable us to understand how prosecutors view a case and how they come up with justified decisions. The standard

Appeals If the defendant is acquitted by the jury or by the judge in a bench trial, the 5th Amendment government prohibits the government from trying the defendant for the same crime. Although there are is no constitutional right to appeal convictions, every state has passed its own laws which allow a convicted defendant to appeal a conviction after trial. The defendant may appeal to an appellate court below the state supreme court

Michigan, in which police officers had failed to satisfy the knock requirement of a "knock and announce" search warrant before obtaining incriminating evidence. The Court decided that technical violations of proper warrant execution in "good faith" of the nature described in Hudson would not trigger the exclusionary rule (Schott, 2006).. Ultimately, as constitutional criminal procedure developed since Mapp, a balance arose between the need to safeguard the constitutional rights of

Australian Criminal Justice System Formal mechanisms are required to make certain there is no bias or discrimination against the people. With informal mechanisms there was unfair treatment of the accused even to the point of receiving unjust sentencing. Those who had the power within the informal mechanisms often received the property or other goods once held by the accused, withhold evidence for personal benefit, or acted as vigilantes exacting their own

Organizational change in any sector implies moving away from the present state and "toward some desired future state" in order to increase the effectiveness of the organization (Lunenburg, 2010, p. 1). Change is typically driven by internal and/or external factors. The impetus for change could be a crisis or, in the case of criminal justice agencies, policy change. Changes to technology or financial resources are other examples of external forces