Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In order to assure that workforce advancement for existing disabled veterans is according to federal guidelines, the Bonneville "action program plan" offers classes and training in "resume writing" and "how to prepare for an interview." Each employee, including disabled veterans, are encouraged to complete an individual development plan with their manager, and are also encouraged to utilize career counselors with their departments.
All these things are mentioned because it is apparent that the federal government has gone to great lengths to open the door for disabled veterans. That doesn't mean, again, that any job opening with a federal agency or a contractor who has been hired by the federal government will automatically go to a disabled veteran. Not at all.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has its own version of an "Affirmative Action Program Plan for Disabled Veterans" (www.usda.gov/da/employ/VETPLAN.01.htm);this is very similar to the Bonneville plan, only it appears that USDA goes even further than Bonneville. "Employing offices are required at all times to accept applications from persons eligible for consideration... [and] all USDA agencies are required to add the following statement to all vacancy announcement: 'Qualified disabled veterans, especially those with 30% or more disabilities and Veteran Readjustment Appointment Eligible will be considered for this position under special hiring authorities." Vacancies must be publicized within the department so jobs will be filled through "internal procedures" the statement reads.
Indeed disabled veterans may actually be hired by a federal agency while in training for the job that they were hired for but have not yet been placed on the job. And "placement does not have to be in the agency in which training was received." This sounds like the discrimination would take place by those seeking the jobs who are not disabled and yet would qualify otherwise for the position.
What is the current situation with regard to Affirmative Action? The U.S. Department of Labor "Employment Standards Administration" (ESA) (Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs) requires "a contractor, as a condition of having a federal contract, to engage in a self-analysis for the purpose of discovering any barriers to...
The ESA office checks all federal agencies to see if the agency or contractor (with 50 or more employees) is complying by having an updated Affirmative Action Program (AAP). The AAP should identify (in the contractor's workforce) that "reflect utilization of women and minorities."
What would constitute an under-utilization of women and minorities? The regulations at 41 CFR 60-211 (b) "define under-utilization as having fewer minorities or women in a particular job group than would be reasonably expected by their availability." In other words, if the contractor can prove that no women or minorities were available for hire at the time the federal contract was awarded, there should be no violation of AAP. In conclusion, in the ADD Project (http://aad.english.ucsb.edu) under "Quota and Proportional Representation" Barbara Bergmann has published an excerpt from her book, noting that "People of color and women have, of course, been subordinated for a long time...and the purpose of Affirmative Action is to reduce segregation by race and sex in the workplace." It's as simple as that. Well, almost; if you factor in all the federal regulations regarding disabled veterans and job availability, it still comes down to fairness and justice.
Works Cited
Bergmann, Barbara. (1996). In Defense of Affirmative Action. New York: Basic Books, 42-47.
Bonneville Power Administration. (2004). Disabled Veteran's Affirmative Action Program
Plan. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.jobs.bpa.gov/How_To_Apply/disabledaction.cfm.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2001). Disabled Veterans Affirmative Action Plan. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.usda.gov/da/employ/VETPLAN.01.htm.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Employment Standards Administration / Office of Federal
Contract Compliance Programs. Retrieved 13 Dec. 2006 at http://www.dol.gov.esa.
United States Office of Personnel Management. (2006). Report to Congress: The Employment
Of Veterans in the Federal Government in FY 2005. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.opm.gov.
Works Cited
Bergmann, Barbara. (1996). In Defense of Affirmative Action. New York: Basic Books, 42-47.
Bonneville Power Administration. (2004). Disabled Veteran's Affirmative Action Program
Plan. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.jobs.bpa.gov/How_To_Apply/disabledaction.cfm.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2001). Disabled Veterans Affirmative Action Plan. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.usda.gov/da/employ/VETPLAN.01.htm.
Contract Compliance Programs. Retrieved 13 Dec. 2006 at http://www.dol.gov.esa.
Of Veterans in the Federal Government in FY 2005. Retrieved 12 Dec. 2006 at http://www.opm.gov.
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity The policies of affirmative action aiming at assisting the black Americans are of recent origin. The policies have sought its origin to varied sources like legal structure, executive instructions, and court rulings. It was during the last three decades that these policies were being developed and they have become debatable as well. (Legal History) During the last three decades of the nineteenth century, a large number of African-Americans
Affirmative Action: Why We Need to Reform It It is widely believed that the American society is a "melting pot" where members of racial, ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities eventually mold into the mainstream, becoming full-fledged citizens of the country. The reality, however, is much more complicated. While it is true that America offers many opportunities to all its citizens, there is a history of discrimination against minority groups that affects
Affirmative Action At its most objective definition, affirmative action entails "positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded." Affirmative action acknowledges the presence of institutionalized and systematic forms of discrimination: which may not be apparent to members of the dominant or privileged culture. For example, white males will not even notice that no Blacks
Affirmative Action Ever since the upheavals of the 1960s precipitated a fundamental change in the way the United States regards civil rights, the notion of affirmative action has been regularly discussed and misunderstood throughout the national discourse. Requirements that certain employers enact affirmative action plans began with an executive order on the heels of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII of which specifies that employers may not discriminate on
This is a particular problem at the nation's colleges and universities. This has become so much of an issue that law suits and verdicts have been handed down in some states. One of the most famous cases to date involved the University of Michigan's undergraduate and law school policies. These cases are Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In 1997, Jennifer Gratz, a white woman, sued the University of
Affirmative Action is the set of public policies and initiatives designed to help eliminate past and present discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Affirmative action was set into place during the 1960's. Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies required that active measures be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoyed the same opportunities for promotions, salary increases, career advancement, school