Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Furthermore the rhetoric here is rich in symbolism. Dr. King draws parallels between the response of violence to his peaceful protests and other great personalities whose commitment to justice, truth, and love also had unintended and unfortunate consequences. Personalities like Socrates and Jesus, for example, could not be expected to deny their truth for fear of public reaction. Dr. King makes this argument even stronger by also drawing the parallel between himself and the completely innocent person, whose possession of money resulted in the evil of theft. By drawing these parallels, Dr. King points out that an argument regarding the actions of others cannot be used to condemn those who protest peacefully. Dr. King and his followers are innocent of the crime of violence. Dr. King's argument is therefore that they cannot be held accountable for the violence committed by others, who are neither followers of his, nor affiliated with his cause.
Dr. King further substantiates his arguments by comparing himself to religious figures, and most notably to figures from the Christian religion, such as the Apostle Paul and Jesus Christ. These comparisons are particularly powerful, as they represent a symbolism with which the clergymen would be able to identify.
One example is Dr. King's use of the concept of extremism in comparing himself to Jesus. At first, he admits disappointment at the label of extremism, especially as this is a paradigm he had attempted to avoid throughout his protest action. However,...
He also uses other figures in this comparison, with the prophet Amos being an extremist for justice and Paul being an extremist for the Gospel. To make this comparison even more powerful for his intended audience, King uses texts from the Bible to substantiate these points.
Dr. King takes this a step further by drawing the parallel further to politicians such as Thomas Jefferson, who was one of the first supporters of the idea of equality in the United States. In identifying himself with all these figures, Dr. King promotes himself as an extremist and with the right to be such.
In conclusion, the letter to the clergymen demonstrates Martin Luther King's passion for his protest against inequality and injustice. He uses the strongest possible terms that can be used from a clergyman's point-of-view. This shows not only that Dr. King feels strongly about his subject matter, but also that he is keenly aware of the sensitivities and knowledge of others. His strength in rhetoric resides in the fact that he can speak and write on any intellectual level, thus influencing his audience to at least be sympathetic to the point-of-view he promotes.
Sources
King, Martin Luther. Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
Smith, N. (2010). Rhetoric and martin Luther King Jr.: "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" and "I Have a Dream." Article Myriad. Retrieved from: http://www.articlemyriad.com/163.htm
Sources
King, Martin Luther. Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
Smith, N. (2010). Rhetoric and martin Luther King Jr.: "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" and "I Have a Dream." Article Myriad. Retrieved from: http://www.articlemyriad.com/163.htm
27). King very definitely understood the challenges facing the movement for justice. He knew he couldn't master all of the challenges but he was effective at planting the seeds of change in the hearts and minds of his followers. In Chapter 3 the authors discuss "cross-cultural communication" and King's "Dream" speech (and his "Letter") both communicated vital messages not just to blacks, but to all of America. King's "Dream"
Letter Birmingham Response to the Letter from Birmingham Jail It is difficult to imagine being in the position Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was in when he wrote this letter. Though it was far from the only time he was arrested during his campaigning for civil rights, the "Birmingham Campaign" that led to this arrest was one of the larger movements of civil disobedience that King helped to lead, and the weight
"In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty." In that argument, the author also draws a comparison with those most committed to maintaining segregation; presumably, he was referring to those who physically attacked and sometimes killed both African-Americans and
Abstract Writing a Letter from Birmingham Jail analysis essay offers the student the gift of going back in time to the courage and ferocity of the Civil Rights Movement to examine one of the most eloquent documents of that era. The Civil Rights Era was one of the uglier periods in American history—and one of the most triumphant and inspiring. No document embodies this dichotomy as fully as King’s Letter from
The essay “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King, written in 1963, is a response to a letter that was written by eight white clergymen, who ultimately condemned the strategies that Dr. King used during the American Civil Rights era. It is important to note that the white clergyman who criticized his actions were the most elite members of the clergy in the entire state of Alabama.
You carefully outline the four steps to your non-violent approach of ending segregation: determining the existence of injustice, attempting to negotiate, purifying and preparing individually and as a group, and finally engaging in peaceful direct action. The case you make for these points is strong, and the evidence in Birmingham supporting this pattern of behavior on your part, and on the part of our enemies as well, is equally apparent.