Employment Discrimination: In The Past Few Years, Essay

Employment Discrimination: In the past few years, employees have obtained new ammunition to file lawsuits related to job discrimination in federal courts, though they still experience numerous challenges against the rising victories. According to the findings of recent studies, workers who sue over employment discrimination tend to lose at higher rates in federal courts as compared to other kinds of plaintiffs. However, most of these employees are hopeful that the recently signed Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act will herald an improved climate for discrimination lawsuits. This is primarily because the legislation makes it easier for employees to sue over pay discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, or age through the extension of the legal deadline to file such cases or lawsuits.

Due to the odds against winning employment discrimination cases, some lawyers have become reluctant to even try to an extent that they have stated that they will no longer take such discrimination suits due to the high possibility of losing. As a result of these measures, employment discrimination case filings in federal courts have declined by approximately 40% between 1999 and 2007 based on the federal court records (Koppel par, 5).

There are various reasons that have been attributed to the bad track record of employment discrimination cases including the dearth of minorities on the bench and intrinsic difficulties in proving employment discrimination. According to lawyers representing employers in such cases, the main reason attributed to the relatively poor performance in lawsuits is that companies tend to be quick in settling cases that seem...

...

On the contrary, cases that are not settled are usually frivolous and should be dismissed. One of the major concerns linked to these cases is that federal judges usually terminate employment-discrimination cases by using motions to dismiss in which plaintiffs are not permitted to carry out fact finding to support their claims.
Slips and Trips at Work:

Slips and trips in the workplace is one of the major aspects in business law, which is one of the major subcategories in tort law. They are also significant aspects in business law because they are the most common cause of injuries at work. Actually, slips and trips account for approximately 40% of all the reported major injuries in the working environment and can contribute to other kinds of serious accidents like falls from height. In the article by Health and Safety Executive, various measures that employers should take to help prevent slips and trips are discussed. In addition to providing simple and low-cost solutions to these major problems, the article describes measures that will be useful to employees and their safety representatives.

This article begins the description of the necessary measures for preventing slips and trips at work through examining significant provisions of major laws on the health and safety of employees at work. The first measure that employers should take to prevent slips and trips is risk assessment, which basically involves managing the health and safety risks in the workplace. While it's a requirement by the law, the employer should carry out risk assessment by first examining whether he/she is doing enough to prevent harm (Health…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

KOPPEL, NATHAN. "Job-Discrimination Cases Tend To Fare Poorly in Federal Court." The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 19 Feb. 2009. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123500883048618747.html>.

Schamotta, Justin. "Difference Between Breach of Contract & Breach of Warranty." Small Business Chron. Hearst Communications, Inc., n.d. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. <http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-breach-contract-breach-warranty-30452.html>.

United Kingdom. Health and Safety Executive. Preventing Slips and Trips at Work - A Brief Guide. Health and Safety Executive, Nov. 2012. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. <http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg225.pdf>.


Cite this Document:

"Employment Discrimination In The Past Few Years " (2012, November 29) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/employment-discrimination-in-the-past-few-83298

"Employment Discrimination In The Past Few Years " 29 November 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/employment-discrimination-in-the-past-few-83298>

"Employment Discrimination In The Past Few Years ", 29 November 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/employment-discrimination-in-the-past-few-83298

Related Documents
Employment Discrimination
PAGES 3 WORDS 870

Employment Discrimination Advertisement Wanted: experienced technical writer and manager sought to write, rewrite and/or edit technical documents. This job entails managing a technical writing team in charge of creating all new documentation for a newly developed architecture software. These documents include: procedure manuals, user manuals, service manuals, for use by consumers and professionals who use the product. The successful applicant will have a seven plus year background in technical writing and a

Employment Discrimination at Wal-Mart Foundation of the Study This study examines the legislative and judicial climate that enables corporations like Wal-Mart to engage in practices that violate workers' rights. The popular consensus is that Wal-Mart, the largest retail store in the United States, displays an inordinate disregard for the human dignity and morale of its employees and, despite continual litigation, continues to blatantly violate the legal rights of its employees. Wal-Mart faces

Transgender Employment Discrimination There is a growing body of evidence that transgender individuals frequently experience some type of discrimination during the employment process in the United States today. Although there are only a few high-profile cases, there are a significant number of employment claims being asserted. In terms of numbers, the high was reached in 1994 when almost 92,000 discrimination charges were filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Since that

Discrimination against the elderly, against pregnant women, against women with children, against people of color are all prohibited under the law. The EEOC or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to administer Title VII of the Civil Rights act and specifically to "progress race, national origin, religious, and sex discrimination claims pursuant to the statue" (Gregory, 2003). Is the EEC doing its job? During the first year alone after

What is happening is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a ruling called MD 715. Inside they changed the hiring requirements and reporting standards for U.S. government agencies. The most notable include: reducing reporting requirements, holding senior managers accountable for reaching agency objectives (versus whom they are hiring), the elimination of predetermined quotas and monitoring for trends when discharging these groups. This is designed to ensure that all

Many of the gaps in protection, such as afforded under Supreme Court precedent to members of suspect classes have since been strengthened by various acts of Congress, such as those in connection with employment discrimination against disabled workers, and those over 45 years of age (Edwards, Wallenberg, & Lineberry, 2008). Undoubtedly, employment (and other forms of) discrimination against members of suspect classifications still occur even today; however, whereas in