Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Enforcing Ethical Business Practices by U.S. Federal Contractors
There have been a number of high-profile cases of corporate wrongdoing in recent years that have involved federal contractors, and these cases have created calls for improved ethical practices in the public and private sectors alike. Because there is an enormous amount of taxpayer resources involved in the federal contracting process, it is vitally important that is conducted in a transparent and ethical fashion, but opportunities for unethical practices are commonplace and tend to increase as firms gain experience and become friendly with federal contractors. In addition, other opportunities for unethical practices can present themselves simply because practitioners are unaware of the long-term implications that are involved, or because they lack formal guidance for unique ethical dilemmas. To gain some fresh insights into these issues, this paper provides a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature to identify the causes of unethical practices by U.S. federal contractors and what steps CEOs can take to prevent unethical practices in federal contracting. Finally, a description of robust business ethics and compliance programs and ways that CEOs can enhance their programs is followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning these issues in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
Causes of Unethical Practices by U.S. Federal Contractors
In some cases, unethical practices are intentional from the outset and are intended to defraud the U.S. government for unjust personal gain (Wentick, 2001). In other cases, though, unethical practices may develop, even inadvertently, over time. In these cases, federal contractors develop good working relationships with the contractors they do business with on a regular basis. According to Wentick (2001), good working relationships between federal contractors and their vendors can facilitate mission achievement, but there are some issues that federal contractors must be alert for, including the following:
If the relationship is with a federal employee who has nothing to do with the contract or the contractor employee, the only concern might be for the protection of "inside information";
If the relationship is with a federal employee who has responsibilities involving the contract or the work being performed by the contractor employee, there will be appearances of conflicts of interest that must be resolved; these appearances often disqualify the federal employee from participating in the official matters affecting the contractor;
If the relationship between the federal and contractor employee results in marriage, the financial interests of the spouse are imputed to the federal employee and any actual or apparent conflicts of interest that are created must be resolved (Wentick, 2001, p. 37).
In addition, a wide range of observers, including practitioners in the construction industry, maintain that the practice of so-called "bid shopping" used by some federal contractors is unethical, and there is growing support in Congress to outlaw this practice by federal contractors (Bid shopping ban on federal construction gains support, 2005). In this context, bid shopping is defined as "the practice of divulging, or causing to be divulged, a contractor's or subcontractor's bid or proposal or requiring a contractor or subcontractor to divulge its bid or proposal to another prospective contractor or subcontractor before the award of a contract or subcontract in order to secure a lower bid or proposal" (Bid shopping ban, 2005, p. 28).
There is evidence that even major corporations have engaged in unethical, if not immoral, business practices (Verschoor, 2002). Indeed, Green and Berry (1999) ask, "Exactly how extensive and expensive is unlawful business behavior?" And report, "The answer is that it occurs with disturbing frequency" (p. 689). A survey by U.S. News & World Report found that 115 of America's 500 largest corporations had been convicted of at least one major crime or have paid civil penalties for serious misbehavior during the preceding 10-year period; moreover, the rate of documented unethical behavior was even higher among the 25 biggest corporations (Green & Berry, 1999). Indeed, during one 4-year period, federal prosecutors in 20 different states discovered a bid-rigging conspiracy among highway contractors that resulted in 400 convictions, 141 prison sentences and more than $50 million in fines (Green & Berry, 1999). Following this series of federal indictments, the average number of companies bidding for federal highway construction projects increased from three to five (Green & Berry, 1999).
Taken together, the opportunities for unethical practices abound in the federal contracting system, but there…[continue]
"Enforcing Ethical Business Practices By U S Federal" (2013, July 29) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enforcing-ethical-business-practices-by-93632
"Enforcing Ethical Business Practices By U S Federal" 29 July 2013. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enforcing-ethical-business-practices-by-93632>
"Enforcing Ethical Business Practices By U S Federal", 29 July 2013, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/enforcing-ethical-business-practices-by-93632
One set of concepts from each area was utilized to explain how the situation at Grand Bois may have come about. The end goal of the authors was to "provide business practitioners, ethics teachers, and readers interested in corporate conduct with insights useful in understanding why managers may act the way they do." It could be argued, according to Hamilton and Berken (2005), that Exxon managers had made a sound
Business Law During the consumer movement of the 1960s and 1970s, Congress enacted a substantial amount of legislation to protect "the good of the people." There is only one problem with consumer protection laws -- they are slow to react and even harder to enforce. As a result of this situation, corporations are allowed to profit at the expense of consumers' health. The resistance comes in a number of stages. The
The basic reason for the diverse findings could refer to the following: most studied have been conducted on a single organization the family-friendly policies are analyzed as a whole and therefore the efficiencies of a single program are neglected employees' answers are given in questioners and the workers have to rely on memory and personal perception most of the studies have no terms of comparison the studies generally measure satisfaction
Disabled Veterans In U.S. history, the term affirmative action is of relatively recent origin, and first came into use under the Kennedy administration in 1961, when it ordered federal contractors to speed up the employment of minorities and banned discrimination on the basis of color, religion of national origin. Lyndon Johnson expanded the use of affirmative action in federal hiring and contracts in 1965-66, although the Civil Rights Act simply forbids
Business Ethics Focus on Merrill Lynch According to Laura Hartman and her co-writer, Joe Desjardins in the work entitled "Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal Integrity & Social Responsibility" philosophical ethics may be clearly differentiated from theological ethics because theological ethics attempted to disseminate the well-being of an individual on a religious basis while the ethics of an individual's philosophy is such that provisions of justifications that can be applied to
3). In addition, the Company strongly believes in fair dealing and has it made a central part in the Code. Each employee, officer and director should endeavor to deal fairly with the Company's customers, suppliers, competitors, officers and employees. None should take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts or any other unfair dealing practice. Stealing proprietary information, misusing trade secret
Business Law: Arbitration Agreements Arbitration in business law is a method used for mediating contradictions between the parties to an agreement. Arbitration agreements make the requirement that the arbitrators, or those who are over the arbitration discussions and the ultimate agreement are neutral parties and in no way in support of either of the parties to the arbitration process. According to one sources arbitration is "one of the dispute resolution processes being