Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
To evaluate the project for T-Mobile, we need to take into account the present-day value of future cash flows. This means that the future cash flows need to be discounted. The case example gives both the future cash flows and the discount rate for T-Mobile, which is the company's cost of capital. The net present value calculation relies on the following equation:
PV of CF = CF1 / (1+r) 1 + CF2 / (1+r) 2 + CF3 / (1+r) 3 + CF4 / (1+r) 4 + CF5 / (1+r)
This is the present value of the future cash flows. Note that as the discount rate is compounding: the longer into the future the cash flow is the more heavily it is discounted. This reflects that time equates to risk, so the further into the future the flow is, the greater risk that the flow change. Thus, the discount rate for future flows must be higher than for flows closer to the present day.
The PV formula provides the present value of the future flows. The net present value calculation then subtracts the present value of the future flows from the known current flows, in this case the $4 million initial investment. The present value of the future flows is as follows:
To finish the NPV calculation, we must then subtract from this the current flows:
$6,160,243 - $4,000,000 = $2,160,243
The net present value of this project is $2.16 million. Therefore, the T-Mobile should accept this project. The rule of thumb with respect to using net present value to evaluate whether or not a project should be undertaken is that if the project has a positive net present value, it should be accepted. This is because the discount rate equates to the expected rate of return on the company's existing operations. Thus, any project that is more valuable to the company than its existing operations is one that the company should undertake.
There is a caveat to the assumption that the project should always be accepted if it has a positive net present value. All NPV calculations are based on assumptions, so the company needs to perform a sensitivity analysis on those assumptions in order to truly understand if the project is going to add value. It helps to be conservative when setting these assumptions. For example, this project has a positive NPV but if the project does not generate the expected cash flows, the NPV might not be positive anymore. The management of T-Mobile will need to understand how changes to its assumptions will affect the NPV of the project.
The shareholders should understand that the NPV is a means of understanding the value of a project. There are other methodologies that can be used but NPV is the best because it takes a number of important factors into consideration. For example, the NPV is based on the concept of the time value of money. Given that T-Mobile has a cost of capital of 6%, this implies that if the company plowed this money back into its current operations, the return would be around 6%. But this project is going to generate revenues for the next five years. A dollar earned in the future is not as valuable as a dollar earned today. Thus, it cannot be considered to have the same value. What the NPV calculation does is it gives those future dollars an equivalent value today, based on the risk that is associated with the company's cash flows.
So the NPV calculation essentially weighs the value of those future cash flows against the value of the initial cash flows. In this example, T-Mobile is spending $4 million to initiate the project and its shareholders need to know what they can expect to gain from that. We have estimates of future cash flows, in future dollars. By discounting those future dollars back to present day to account for the risk associated with the fact that those flows are in the future, we are able to make a more accurate comparison between the initial cost of the project and the cash flows that come from the project in the future. Because the value of those flows in the future is greater than the initial cost, we are recommending that T-Mobile accept…[continue]
"Finance To Evaluate The Project For T-Mobile " (2011, December 14) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-to-evaluate-the-project-for-t-mobile-53371
"Finance To Evaluate The Project For T-Mobile " 14 December 2011. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-to-evaluate-the-project-for-t-mobile-53371>
"Finance To Evaluate The Project For T-Mobile ", 14 December 2011, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-to-evaluate-the-project-for-t-mobile-53371
Mobile Telephony Cellular service was launched in UK in 1985. Cantel and affiliates of Mobility UK were licenced to operate at 800 MHz. Personal Communications Services (PCS) operating at 1.8 GHz was licenced in UK in December 1995 with two new players, Clearnet and Microcell each receiving 30 MHz of spectrum. Mobility UK affiliates and Cantel each received 10 MHz of new spectrum. PCS service was launched in late 1997. Today,
Mobile & Cloud Computing Cloud Computing Author's note with contact information and more details on collegiate affiliation, etc. This paper will define cloud computing and mobile cloud computing even while there is no current consensus on their definitions as it is a newly forming field of study and technology. The paper will additionally describe the utility and the structure of mobile cloud and cloud computing. Furthermore, the paper will address topics within
Internet and Global Finance Strategies Within the present competitive business environment, firms are continuously looking for various strategies to be ahead of their competitors and achieve competitive market advantages. Many firms have identified that internet technology is a powerful tool to enhance competitive market advantages. The traditional organizations have identified that internet is a powerful tool to deliver value to customer and presently, the internet technology has enabled firms to coordinate
International Finance The three companies that will be evaluated for purchase are LG, Sony and Xiaomi. Some of the report will discuss the individual companies, but a large portion of this report will go into discussing the country situations of these companies. They hail from South Korea, Japan and the People's Republic of China respectively. The differences between these Northeast Asian countries can be significant, and it is these differences that
Apple (Mac) Finances and Globalization Apple's goal is not making money, claims Sir Jonathan Ive - Apple's head of design. For a mega company that is worth a reported $539 billion, this might pass as a frivolous statement and Ive admits this. However, he asserts that his sentiments are true and factual. Ive clarifies that their goal is producing excellent products. These statements were made at the British Embassy's Creative Summit
Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature Chapter Introduction This chapter provides the background and an overview of the debate concerning national health insurance and the issues surrounding the provision of universal health care in the United States. A discussion of the implications of universal health care for private insurance carriers and other stakeholders is followed by a review of the criticisms being directed at current efforts to reform health care in the
This will not only create a higher level of trust in the actual implementation, it will also set the foundation for more effective ongoing support for these users if they have any problems with the systems once they are installed. An effective change management strategy is as important, if not more important, than the technology upgrade and implementation plan itself (Gil, Tether, 2011). In implementing any it Project the concept