Financial Analysis Of Nike Corporate

PAGES
5
WORDS
1251
Cite

Financial Analysis of Nike Nike Corporation (NKE: NYSE) is a global leader in the research and development, design and global marketing of a series of apparel, accessory, equipment and footwear products. The company is globally recognized for its excellence in marketing with the Nike brand being considered one of the top ten globally every year in consumer surveys where unaided awareness is the basis of analysis (Kwon, Kim, Mondello, 2008). Nike has one of the most extensive supply chains of any global apparel manufacturer, with a series of supplier quality audits and compliance standards including Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives and programs are enforced across the thousands of companies it sources from (Doorey, 2011). Today Nike operates in 170 different nations, dividing their overall operations into six divisions including China, Central and Eastern Europe, North America, Western Europe and Emerging Markets. Nike has over two dozen product lines it sells with the four dominant product groups being apparel, equipment, footwear and ancillary products (Nike Investor Relations, 2011). In the latest full fiscal year the company generated $20.8B in revenues, earing $9.8B in gross profits. Pretax Income increased from $2.5B in 2010 to $2.8B in 2011, with Inventory Turnover and Average Collection Periods showing solid gains. Profitability ratios were borderline however with only slight improvement in Operating Margin Before and After Depreciation and Returns on Assets (ROA). For a ratio analysis fiscal years 2006 to 2011, please see Appendix A: Nike Financial Analysis, for a full financial analysis of the company.

Firm, Industry, and Environment

The U.S. footwear manufacturing industry is consolidating rapidly and is expected to have a brief period of slow growth before further long-term consolidation continues. Nike currently has a 40% market share of this industry, which is estimated to be $1.7B in size according to IBIS Research, a research firm Nike management teams often use as the basis of their decision making (Nike Investor...

...

According to IBIS, the U.S. footwear manufacturing market has experienced a negative compound annual growth rate from 2006 to 2011 of 4.4%, stabilizing to a negative 1.8% from 2011 to 2016 (Nike Investor Relations, 2011). There are today 698 different companies competing in this industry generating a combined profit of $112M (Nike Investor Relations, 2011). Nike, across all product categories, generated a $2.8B Pretax Income at the close of their FY2011. This comparison of industry profitability to Nike's overall profitability underscore how effective the integrated manufacturing, branding and service aspects of this company are in delivering long-term shareholder and customer value (Ramaswamy, 2008).
Based on an analysis of the competitive dynamics in this market and the continued global consolidation of shoe and apparel manufacturing, several key success factors emerge as critical to long-term profitability. When Nike is evaluated on these criterion their leadership in the global athletic apparel and footwear becomes clear. These key success factors include brand name equity and global leadership; ability to quickly alter goods and services to match the specific needs of market conditions and requirements; have a deep expertise in managing government policies and defining their implications on the performance of the company; and being able to define and execute quickly on economics of scope and scale in their supply chains. All of these are the core competencies of Nike, as can be seen from their high level of brand equity (Kwon, Kim, Mondello, 2008) and extensive supply chain expertise including CSR initiatives globally (Doorey, 2011). Nike senior management continually monitors all of these factors and often creates a series of graphical analyses that show the direction of the industry, which is how IBIS Research created Figure 1, Industry Analysis of American Footwear Manufacturing, 2011. This figure illustrates the consolidation of the industry and growth rates relative to GDP.

Figure 1, Industry Analysis of American Footwear…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Doorey, D.. (2011). The Transparent Supply Chain: from Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587-603.

Kwon, H., Kim, H., & Mondello, M.. (2008). Does a Manufacturer Matter in Co-branding? The Influence of a Manufacturer Brand on Sport Team Licensed Apparel. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 163-172.

Nike Investor Relations (2011). Investor Relations. Retrieved December 13, 2011, from Nike Investor Relations and Filings with the SEC Web site: http://investors.nikeinc.com/

Venkat Ramaswamy. (2008). Co-creating value through customers' experiences: the Nike case. Strategy & Leadership, 36(5), 9-14.


Cite this Document:

"Financial Analysis Of Nike" (2011, December 13) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-of-nike-48477

"Financial Analysis Of Nike" 13 December 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-of-nike-48477>

"Financial Analysis Of Nike", 13 December 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-of-nike-48477

Related Documents

Nike Financial Analysis Nike earned a net income of 2.133 billion in fiscal 2011 on revenues of $20.862 billion. A trend analysis of the income statement shows that net income grew 9.7% in FY 2011, whereas the net income grew by 11.8%. In the previous year (FY2010), Nike's revenue actually declined by 0.8%, while the net income increased by 28.2%. The performance over the past two years indicates that Nike has faced

Nike: Financial Analysis The relevance of analyzing the financial stability and health of an entity cannot be overstated especially when it comes to the determination of the future performance of the concerned entity. This text undertakes an in-depth financial analysis of Nike, a well-known footwear, equipment, and apparel designer. In seeking to conduct an in-depth analysis of Nike, I will amongst other things describe the company and its operations in significant detail,

For any strategic planning activity to be effective there must be the ability to quickly define process-level changes to increase competitive advantage. Mintzberg's critique of the strategic planning process is illustrated in the shortcomings of the Ashoff Matrix in this regard. Lack of strategic prioritization of projects within the context of the Ansoff Matrix - the Ansoff Matrix does not provide for strategic criteria to be applied to specific projects.

The use of RFID in this industry also has been more tactical and focused on the scanning and inventory management systems as opposed to automating an entire supply chain and creating auditabiluity and therefore increasing performance of the entire chain. This is one of the shortcomings of how the industry is shortchanging itself in terms of technology adoption. In addition, the majority of spending in this industry is going

Marketing - Nike: Company Analysis NIKE: A Genius World of Advertising and Marketing The media bombards society with commercial messages daily, both written and spoken. There are, for example, the easily forgettable newspaper ads, the brightly colored billboards on the highway that one can see while driving, or on the side of buildings, the man or woman sitting on the side of the road with a flyer, or the boring radio commercials. There

This strategy of customization increases sales and profits per pair of shoes produced. Successful Acquisitions and Partnerships Nike acquired Official Starter Properties and Official Starter in later 2004. These two entities were the sole owners and licensors of the Starter, Team Starter and Asphalt brand names as well as master licensee of the Shaq and Dunkman brands (a line of athletic apparel, footwear and accessory products for the value retail channel).