Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
International accounting - Evaluate research theories and methodologies to classify accounting systems internationally
The necessity of accounting standards is given by the fact that financial statements should describe financial performance in a fair and consistent manner. Lacking standards, users of financial statements would be required to master the accounting rules of each company, and any comparison between companies' performances would be almost impossible.
Accounting standards are essential to the healthy development of an international financial reporting structure. Around the world several accounting traditions have been developed as a response to the needs of users who are in need of the financial information. Some countries, for instance, chose to build the structure of accounting standards around the needs of private creditors, while other countries were more concerned with the needs of tax authorities or central planners. As a characteristic of the United States, the needs of participants in the capital markets have been taken into account when such standards were developed.
Accounting standards mean that a comprehensive set of neutral accounting principles exists; such principles require consistent, comparable, relevant and reliable information, which proves useful for investors, lenders and creditors, and any other players on the capital allocation market. Accounting standards are paramount to the efficient functioning of a market economy, as decisions on how to allocate capital rely on credible and accessible financial information.
If someone issues financial statements and uses more than one accounting standard, it may prove tricky to explain to any other party the accuracy of the different sets of financial statements if significantly different operating results, financial positions or cash flow classifications are reported for the same period. One might have questions about the credibility of an entity's financial reporting, if the differences demonstrate that concealment of poor financial performance, lack of profitability, or deterioration of the quality of assets are effects of one approach.
Accounting standards commonly used today in the United States are known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The term "generally accepted" is applied because either an authoritative body has set them or the accounting profession has accepted them and uses them on a large scale.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is a U.S. regulatory agency that has the authority to establish accounting standards for publicly traded companies. Each company has to file certain reports with the SEC, under the provisions of The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (e.g. form 10-Q must be filed quarterly and 10-K annually). Although no standards-issuing body existed when the SEC came into existence, rather then setting these standards, the SEC chose to let the private sector deal with the problem and set them on its own.
In 1939, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) formed the Committee on Accounting Procedure (CAP), following the recommendations of the SEC. Until 1959, CAP issued 51 accounting Research Bulletins that dealt with specific problems as they arose. CAP didn't have much success because it failed to develop a general accounting framework, and focused on emerging issues. AICPA replaced CAP, in 1959, with the Accounting Principles Board (APB), which issued 31 opinions and 4 statements until 1973, when it was dissolved. GAAP is a direct result of the opinions of the APB. The APB attracted criticism on its structure and its positions on several controversial issues; so, in 1971 the Wheat Committee (chaired by Francis Wheat) was formed, its objective being the evaluation of the APB and the planning of its future.
The Wheat Committee decided that a new standards-setting structure is more appropriate and recommended that the Accounting Principles Board be replaced. This new structure was established in 1973 and was made up of three organizations: the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) - the primary operating organization - and the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC).
Unlike the APB, FASB was conceived to be an independent board; its members were not part of private companied anymore, as they chose to sever their ties with their employers. While AICPA is empowered to issue audit guides, FASB's job is the issuance of statements regarding the financial accounting standards, which define GAAP. If a conflict should occur, FASB has the right to decide on its outcome.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has been designated in 1973 to act as an organization in the private sector, concentrating its efforts on establishing standards of financial accounting and reporting. The preparation of financial reports is made in accordance to the provisions of these standards. They are officially recognized as authoritative by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (Financial Reporting Release No. 1, Section 101) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (Rule 203, Rules of Professional Conduct, as amended May 1973 and May 1979). Investors, creditors, auditors and other involved parties have to rely on credible, transparent and comparable financial data; therefore, the standards issued by FASB are essential to the efficient functioning of the economy.
The Mission of the FASB is to set and constantly improve standards of financial accounting and reporting, its final purpose being the guidance and education of the public, which included issuers, auditors and other users of financial information.
Broad accounting concepts as well as standards for financial reporting are constantly being developed by FASB, which should also provide guidance on the implementation of standards. The Board works with concepts as they are useful when setting standards, and they also manage to provide a frame of reference, or conceptual framework, which is the base for resolving accounting issues. The framework establishes limits for judgment in preparing financial information and aims at "increasing understanding of, and confidence in, financial information on the part of users of financial reports. It also will help the public to understand the nature and limitations of information supplied by financial reporting.
The Board's work on both concepts and standards is based on research aimed at gaining new insights and ideas. Research is conducted by the FASB staff and others, including foreign national and international accounting standard-setting bodies. The Board's activities are open to public participation and observation under the "due process" mandated by formal Rules of Procedure. The FASB actively solicits the views of its various constituencies on accounting issues."
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was formed in 1973 and its mission is the encouragement of international cooperation in developing consistent worldwide accounting principles. In 2001, the IASC was replaced by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), which is similar to FASB, as its structure is that of an independent private sector body.
The IAS (International Accounting Standards) is a set of standards that state the way in which financial statements should reflect particular types of transactions and other events. Despite the fact that IASB lacks formal authority and is not entitled to ask for compliance with its accounting standards, many countries, including those in the European Union, require the financial statements of publicly-traded companies to be prepared as provided by the IAS.
As to the global spread of the implementation of the International Accounting Standards, it would seem that "many countries already endorse International Accounting Standards (IAS) as their own either without amendment or else with minor additions or deletions. Furthermore, important developments are taking place in the European Union, where the European Commission is progressing proposals that will require all listed companies in the European Union to prepare their consolidated financial statements using International Accounting Standards. Already, both inside and outside the EU, many leading companies have stated that they prepare their financial reports in accordance with International Accounting Standards. Other countries do not permit companies to use IAS (International Accounting Standards) without reconciliation to domestic generally accepted accounting principles. Most notable among these countries are Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States."
The body which governs the development of the IAS is the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), an independent and privately-funded accounting standard setter with its headquarters in London, UK. The Board has an international composition, as its members come from nine countries and have different backgrounds. The Board's intention is to develop a "single set of high quality, understandable and enforceable global accounting standards that require transparent and comparable information in general purpose financial statements," in the public interest. To ensure its success, the Board constantly cooperates with national accounting standard setters in order to achieve convergence and to rapidly implement the same standards around the world.
In April 2001, the International Accounting Standards Board announced that the new designation for its accounting standards is "International Financial Reporting Standards." The Interpretations of International Accounting Standards issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) (which was formerly known as the "Standing Interpretations Committee" (SIC)) don't have the same status as the IAS, but, in accordance with IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, paragraph 11, "financial statements should not be described as complying with International Accounting Standards unless they comply with all the requirements of each applicable Standard and each applicable interpretation of the Standing…[continue]
"International Accounting - Evaluate Research Theories And" (2004, August 29) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/international-accounting-evaluate-research-173025
"International Accounting - Evaluate Research Theories And" 29 August 2004. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/international-accounting-evaluate-research-173025>
"International Accounting - Evaluate Research Theories And", 29 August 2004, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/international-accounting-evaluate-research-173025
Purpose/Perceived Value The findings of this report will be valuable to two different audiences. The first consists of accounting regulatory bodies. These bodies are working towards convergence and are presently struggling with the resistance from the business community. Understanding the nature of that resistance is key to finding ways of overcoming it. For the large publicly traded corporations themselves, this report will help them understand why they and their peers are
Accounting Theory Why accounting research has had so little impact on preventing such failures in accounting practice? The modern economic society has seen many scientific researches that have been directed at establishing the nature of performance of economic activities. The present world is a literate society that depends on the technicalities of life and assumption of activities as they happen in the natural society. In order to have a genuine avenue of
Accounting Information System: Role of Relevance and Reliability in the Conceptual Framework The development any system, whether manual or automated, requires a conceptual framework that serves as the foundation for the establishment of requirements, policies, standards and procedures. From the conceptual framework, the various applications can be developed and when these proved to be effective and efficient, best practices are established and become the model for other systems to follow. Developing an
For example, Shu-Acquaye (2007) cites the basic differences in the legal systems in various parts of the world as contributing to the different approaches to corporate governance. Likewise, Shu-Acquaye cites these differences and adds, "The American corporate governance system adheres to the idea of shareholder primacy. Because the United Kingdom, Austria, and Canada share a legal system based on English common law and equity principles, they are similar to
The European Union also has its own version for corporate social responsibility. (Landau, 85) Thus the U.S. polity was forced to adapt international opinions and legislate both for the external and internal aspects of its economy. Human rights, labor laws and a host of international issues like global warming and the use of chemicals were all reflected in amendments of the local laws while some of the issues like
As, the Delphi methodology will help us to determine the various opinions of the experts. While qualitative research will organize these views and allow us to study different aspects of the problem. This is the point that we will be taking a more balanced approach in dealing with these issues. (What is Qualitative Research 2010) Purpose/Perceived Value The purpose of this study will help us to understand specific factors. That are
Accounting CPA. Ideas 1- My story: I a young, my father gave responsibility manage budget house. School I control budget Volunteer Personal statement: Why I want to obtain an MSc in Accounting Ever since I was young, I have had the responsibility of balancing a budget. My father encouraged me to manage some of the household finances, and by the time I was selected in school to oversee the treasury of