Labeling Gmos The Use Of Essay

.several aspects of gene insertion may be more hazardous than traditional plant crossbreeding" (Roseboro 2011). The memo came to light during the 1990s when a suit was brought against the FDA, arguing that allowing GMOs to be released into the market unlabeled "violated the U.S. Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which mandates that new food additives be established safe through testing prior to marketing" (Roseboro 2011). The suit was not successful. However, even some food industry advocates believe that labeling GMOs might not necessarily be a negative step, given the fact that it has proven to be such a barrier between the U.S. And other nations, in terms of exporting American products. The EU is a large potential market, as is Latin America and other continents that do not allow GMOs to be sold. Labeling GMOs, it is hoped might make them more palatable to regulators. At present, current policies are "leading to potential disruption of trade flows in agriculture; these conflicts could compromise global food security at a time when growing population and food imbalances are seen as increasingly likely in the next century" (Runge & Jackson 2009). Even some developing nations are rejecting American products offered as aid because they contain GMOs.

However, "given the extent to which GMOs have already entered the food and fiber chain" the debate over GMO labeling in the U.S. might be a moot point (Runge & Jackson 2009). Consumers now have choice in the form of 'negative' labeling -- they can select products that are labeled as not containing significant amounts of GMOs, although the degree to which this can be tested, especially in agricultural products, is dubious. Unless products are labeled as not containing GMOs, consumers must be suspicious regarding its content -- and even then they may not be able to live an entirely GMO-free life, if there...

...

Labeling in the long run will not stem the tide of GMO products, if the labels become ubiquitous on a wide variety of foods, or if non-GMO labels are relatively meaningless (much like the label 'organic') because of cross-contamination. It is uncertain if consumers will refuse to buy products containing GMOs, given that large numbers of consumers do not only consume GMO-free products. The true goal of anti-GMO activists is banning GMOs altogether, and fighting for this cause might be the more difficult, but more legitimate fight if they genuinely believe there is compelling scientific evidence that GMOs will harm human health and agriculture.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

AquaAdvantage Fish. (2011). Aqua Bounty. Retrieved October 18, 2011 at http://www.aquabounty.com/products/products-295.aspx

Bittman, Mark. (2011). Why aren't genetically modified foods labeled? The New York Times.

Retrieved October 18, 2011 at http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/why-arent-g-m-o-foods-labeled/?ref=geneticallymodifiedfood

The future of food. (2004). Directed by Deborah Koons.
Philpott, Tim. (2011). Obama's broken promises. Mother Jones. Retrieved October 18, 2011 at http://motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2011/10/fda-labeling-gmo-genetically-modified-foods
Retrieved October 18, 2011 at http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/october2011/FDAignoredscientistswarningsGMfoods.php
Runge, C. Ford & Lee Ann Jackson. (2009). Negative labeling of genetically -- modified organisms (GMOs): The Experience Of rBST. 3(1): 9. Retrieved October 18, 2011 at http://www.agbioforum.org/v3n1/v3n1a09-runge.htm


Cite this Document:

"Labeling Gmos The Use Of" (2011, October 18) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/labeling-gmos-the-use-of-46584

"Labeling Gmos The Use Of" 18 October 2011. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/labeling-gmos-the-use-of-46584>

"Labeling Gmos The Use Of", 18 October 2011, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/labeling-gmos-the-use-of-46584

Related Documents

One of the most controversial issues in food politics today is the question of genetically modified organisms. Many consumers dispute whether such products are safe at all. But while the evidence regarding the safety of GMOs continues to be debated within the scientific community, another debate has arisen, specifically regarding the need to label products which contain GMOs within them. Because of the ubiquitous nature of GMOs in agriculture, GMO-containing

GMO producers also feel that this would give consumers the impression that GMOs are unhealthy or unsafe and that non-GMO crops are preferred (Raab & Grobe, 2003). Valid scientific evidence is lacking as to whether GMOs are healthy or unhealthy in the long run. However, support is building for the position that regardless of the outcome, consumers have the right to know and to make an informed decision. Producers in

GMO Food Labeling Genetically modified foods (genetically modified foods) have been an issue of controversy since their early development. genetically modified foods refer to organisms that are intended for human or animal consumption that have been modified artificially to enhance certain plant traits. Some of these traits include pesticide resistance, herbicide tolerance, disease resistance, cold tolerance, drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, improved nutrition, pharmaceuticals, and phytoremediation, which is the use of plants

Genetically Modified Foods ' There has been a great deal of controversy over genetically modified foods (GMOs). First, many individuals and organizations oppose the concept of altering the genetics of foods for any reason. And secondly, there is a hot debate as to whether or not food manufacturers should publish / label their packages as containing GMOs. This paper covers the controversies and provides several angles to the debates. The way in

FSMA Preventative Controls Rule and GMO Labeling Introduction During his campaign Donald Trump pledged to roll back regulations. Upon entering the White House, President Trump made good on that promise with the January 30, 2017, Executive Order (EO) entitled “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs.” The EO directed federal agencies to abolish two regulations for every new regulation implemented (PMA, 2017). In terms of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), food

Reliance on GMOs and Biotechnology and Potential Environmental and Health Consequences The modern consumer may not be aware of what it is that he or she is actually buying when they go out to the grocery store. When they pick up an apple or tomato, they might very well be purchasing a myriad of chemicals which the producers of that product have inserted into the food. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are