Machiavelli In The Sixteenth Century, Florence Was Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1015
Cite
Related Topics:

Machiavelli In the sixteenth century, Florence was in a period of turmoil and political instability due to the clashes between different ruling elite. It was in this social and political climate that Niccolo Machiavelli wrote The Prince. The book is a practical guide to world leadership. The author focuses on the qualities of successful and unsuccessful leaders, the nature of their actions and decisions, and how they can and should react to various situations when they arise in the political arena. Machiavelli uses historical examples to substantiate his claims, when possible. One of the defining features of Machiavelli's The Prince is that the author is primarily concerned with maintaining political order and stability, rather than on making ethical choices. This stems directly from the historical context of political instability in which Machiavelli wrote. Similarly, Machiavelli's primary concerns are for how leaders can remain strong and powerful in their domains and not with the rights of the citizens. The Prince is studied both for its content, in terms of what Machiavelli says about the nature of effective leadership and how that can be applied to contemporary issues; and also for its historical and philosophical interest.

Divided into 26 brief chapters, The Prince offers succinct information about each topic. Modern readers might compare it to a self-help guide, which can be applied to various situations. The first three chapters are about the different structures of "principalities" and republics. Machiavelli points out the difference between a ruler who...

...

A "new principality" can be one that is "entirely new" or one that has been annexed to an existing principality. The author remains concerned primarily with principalities rather than republics, and Machiavelli points this out clearly in Chapter 2. In Chapter 2, the author claims that it is much easier to hold stable a hereditary state because the people are "long accustomed to the family of their prince," (Chapter 2). In Chapter 3, Machiavelli points out that it is easier to take over principalities that have strong centralized government and weak local authorities, versus ones with strong local authorities that might threaten, antagonize, or usurp the new leader.
Machiavelli suggests that strong leader be keen opportunists, taking advantage of weaknesses in order to conquer. For example, in Chapter 6, Machiavelli notes that people who are oppressed will be ripe for new leadership and the prince can take advantage of this situation. "It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out of bondage," (Chapter 6). However, the author notes that when a prince comes to power too easily, it may be difficult to remain in power. "Those who solely by good fortune become princes from being private citizens have little trouble in rising, but much in keeping atop; they have not any difficulties on the way up, because they fly, but they have…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Online version: http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm


Cite this Document:

"Machiavelli In The Sixteenth Century Florence Was" (2013, April 24) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/machiavelli-in-the-sixteenth-century-florence-100656

"Machiavelli In The Sixteenth Century Florence Was" 24 April 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/machiavelli-in-the-sixteenth-century-florence-100656>

"Machiavelli In The Sixteenth Century Florence Was", 24 April 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/machiavelli-in-the-sixteenth-century-florence-100656

Related Documents

" Parallels with business takeovers are frighteningly stark. Change. In the Prince he says "It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things" (Machiavelli). Relevancy...and Not The impact of Machiavelli's writing on politics has been accepted for some time, but the relevance of his ideas to business had to wait until

Machiavelli and the City
PAGES 8 WORDS 2348

Machiavelli's Understanding of the Populace in the Prince and the Discourses The focus of this study is Machiavelli's Understanding of the Populace in the Prince and the Discourses. This study will answer the question of what makes the populace of his contemporary era different from that of other places and times. Secondly this work will compare the populace of Machiavelli's contemporary era with past societies and republics. Machiavelli's Understanding of the

However, to interpret Machiavelli from this angle only would be to view his thoughts myopically. (Viroli, 1998) This is because the other piece of work that Machiavelli wrote at about the same time, the "Discourses on Livy" showed Machiavelli to be essentially a republican who perceived the state to be an autonomous and secular entity which depended upon mass support and human skills for its survival. According to a

Charles Van Doren has concluded that the Copernican Revolution is actually the Galilean Revolution because of the scale of change introduced by Galileo's work. The technological innovation of the Renaissance era started with the invention of the printing press (the Renaissance). Even though the printing press, a mechanical device for printing multiple copies of a text on sheets of paper, was first invented in China, it was reinvented in the

" The use of oil paints was important in Italy during the Renaissance as well as the printing press which came out of Germany. Italy, according to Muhlberger (1999) and specifically the city of Florence took the lead in "setting styles in thought, literary expression, art and education." The Renaissance was a "movement of self-assertion." (Muhlberger, 1999) in this work the two legacies of Petrarch are explained as well as

Lorenzo de Medici especially helped doubling the art collection of the family and provided a liberal and generous material support for the artists. Moreover, his great critical thinking ensured that the true artistic values of the time were promoted. He constructed schools for painting and sculpture and monitored the artists that attended them in his search for artistic value. Under his rule, some of the greatest painters produced their greatest