Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The Discussion Over The Term Paper

Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The discussion over the relationship between mind and body that has been intriguing philosophers for a long time is divided into two broad categories: dualism and monism. According to dualism mind and body are two separate substances. There are several types of dualist views including parallelism, epiphenomenalism, occassionalism and interactionism. John Locke and Rene Descartes are among those who laid the foundation of this idea. Whereas Locke and Descartes believed in Dualism, there were other famous philosophers and thinkers who supported monism. Monism refers to the theory that mind and body are inseparable and thus one is influenced by the other.

Aristotle, Hobbes, Hegel and Berkeley were some of the well-known theorists who believed in monism though their views differed slightly. Monist arguments were in direct contrast with dualist views but it is Philosophical writings of Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and his dualism theory that paves the way for further debate and discussion in this important mind-body issue. The whole problem revolves around the question, is mind the same thing as body and if yes, how and if no, why not? The debate may appear simple to those of us who are rather scientific...

...

Modern scientists have removed the soul and spirit part to dissolve and discard the mind body issue. However the solution is not that simple, not at least for philosophers who have tried endlessly to seek a suitable answer to this question.
Rene Descartes resolved the issue by focusing on the dualist views, which suggest that mind and body are two different entities, which interact with each other as, and when the need arises. He presented two arguments in this connection, which have been widely challenged and argued by later philosophers. However Descartes' views were found interesting and opened door for further research and debate in this area.

In the first argument, he states that mind and body are separate entities, which cannot be considered 'one' for several reasons. He based his argument on the notion that since existence of mind cannot be doubted while body's existence is debatable; it means that the two are not the same. In Meditation 2-page 262, Descartes clearly writes: "You cannot doubt you have a mind. You can doubt that you have a body. So, your mind and your body are not identical." However this is a highly vague idea, which doesn't leave anyone wiser. Why would we doubt the…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Flew A. (1979): A Dictionary of Philosophy, London: Pan Books Ltd.

R. Rorty,(1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature: Princeton.


Cite this Document:

"Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The Discussion Over The" (2003, May 11) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mind-body-problem-descartes-the-discussion-148489

"Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The Discussion Over The" 11 May 2003. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mind-body-problem-descartes-the-discussion-148489>

"Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The Discussion Over The", 11 May 2003, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mind-body-problem-descartes-the-discussion-148489

Related Documents
Philosophy of Mind
PAGES 4 WORDS 1275

Mind-body debate is central to the philosophy of consciousness. Two of the most significant philosophers to specialize in the analysis of the mind-body relationship are Nicolas Malebranche, a French Cartesian dualist, and Gottfried Liebniz, a German philosopher of mind who consciously breaks from a dualistic metaphysic. These two philosophers present two divergent, yet strangely harmonious views of the mind-body interaction and the philosophical problems it creates. Insofar as the mind-body

Descartes -- Discourse on the Method Rene Descartes was firmly rooted in the idea that all questions could be answered through mathematical or scientific means. His approach to constructing solutions, verifying knowledge, or establishing truths was methodical and based in the principles that had been established by others in relevant disciplines and were believed at the time to be reliable. He was the consummate introvert, believing that answers existed within and

Mind and the Body the
PAGES 2 WORDS 598

In addition, he makes several considerations about the machines which have the capacity to learn. He suggests that technological improvements and a learning process associated with rewards and punishments can contribute to having machines learn. Under these circumstances, he states, we would be only a step away from having machines with the capacity of autonomous thinking. John Searle is also interested in the argument. Unlike Turing, he concludes that regardless

Philosophy and Psychology of the Mind and Body Throughout human history, philosophers, doctors, and most recently, psychologists, have attempted to understand the relationship between the mind and body and how it results in human beings' awareness and perception of reality. At least since the golden age of Greek philosophy, thinkers have been aware of an ostensible distinction between the mind and body, a distinction that nonetheless allows for some intermingling such

Mental Representations and the Mind-Brain Relationship MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS AND THE MIND-BRAIN The Dualism Argument Pure Materialist Viewpoint Theories Visual Stimuli vs. Speech stimuli Descartes Point-of-View Neurons and Synapses Mental Representations and the Mind-Brain Relationship In cognitive (neuro) science all through the last few decades, as in philosophy in the last 100 years, the issue of the mind-body (or mind-brain) occurrences is still open to discussion. Illogically, ever since Descartes nobody has suggested a workable alternate view of this problem.

Descartes and Aquinas
PAGES 8 WORDS 3378

Aquinas and Descartes The discourse on the relationship between mind and matter and between human being and nature has been a pervasive theme throughout the history of Western philosophy. The philosophical views of Thomas Aquinas and Rene Descartes represent diametrically opposed aspects of this problem. From Aristotle, Aquinas derived the concept of matter, not as an inert subject but having the potential to attain form. Aquinas does recognize the distinction between form