Performance Management System General Motors Research Paper

The sources of information will be integrated by analyzing the data and comparing the feedbacks to determine if they show consistency; before drafting the final report. Development

The performance appraisal method of evaluating the behavior for rating has a critical technique of analyzing information incorporated. Therefore, in developing the tool, the first approach is to establish the information that is required (Flynn, 2010). Once determined, the questioned are phrased and documented into questionnaires and interviews, which will then be administered to the supervisors, the co-workers and customers for feedback purposes. Additionally, the previous reports on the company's trends will be incorporated to show how the behavioral changes in the department affect the returns of the company. The information gathered is then consolidated into a report for the final scaling which is the report of the performance management system team. The appraisal tool is complete when the whole procedure, from gathering information to the final report production is established and outlined completely.

Cost benefit analysis

The employee performance levels impact the overall expenditure of a company. General Motors is not exceptional as it is evident from the objectives it wishes to attain, that one of the objectives is about reducing the recurrent expenditures to minimum possible value. This proposed performance evaluation system will help identify the area where the company is losing its inputs; by establishing the employee performance levels (Maurer, 2002). To execute the plan, the initial preparation cost for the plan, to acquire the necessary equipment for evaluation, the company needs $15,000. This will be spent on acquiring the materials. Additionally, a sum of $25,000 is needed to cater for the execution of the plan for the first time, these constitute the fixed costs. The variable costs depend on the period and locality of the place where the plan will be executed. An estimate of $10,000 annually is enough to cater for the plan.

The metrics of the format of the appraisal...

...

The chosen scale is intensive, as it requires the sources of information to get ample time to respond to questions. Therefore, the process will take some time, ranging between three and four weeks for gathering information. The intervals for conducting the appraisal can be as the company decides, and the most appropriate interval is annual. The costs for the whole appraisal process are about $30,000. The process of evaluating the employees will take a short period, depending on how the management reacts to the resultant recommendations of the appraisal findings. Weeding out the undesired characters of employees, and ensuring that the performance levels of the employees remain at peak level will see the benefits of the returns to the company raise in short length of time. The huge losses witnessed from low sales and law suits by clients due to incompetence of the employees; for instance the law case that saw General Motors pay a total of $49 million when a car exploded after being hit from behind by another car will be minimized if not fully eliminated. In a year's time, the company can hit the $1 million mark from the sales. The performance appraisal technique will ensure that the company's growth in sales remains steady, and the quality of vehicles manufactured is beyond reproach. The customers will also equally be satisfied and thus more for the company.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Josiane Fahed-Sreih, (2009) "The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance,"

Management Research News, Vol. 32 Iss: 3, pp.297-299

Maurer, S.D. (2002). A practitioner-based analysis of interviewer job expertise and scale format as contextual factors in situational interviews. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 307-327.

Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220142693?accountid=35812


Cite this Document:

"Performance Management System General Motors" (2013, April 21) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-management-system-general-motors-89990

"Performance Management System General Motors" 21 April 2013. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-management-system-general-motors-89990>

"Performance Management System General Motors", 21 April 2013, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-management-system-general-motors-89990

Related Documents

General Motors Company, commonly called as GM is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in the world. It is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. It has business operations in more than 157 countries around the Globe. It was founded in 1908 as General Motors Corporation; and renamed as General Motors in 2009. The top brands of the company include Chevrolet, Isuzu, GMC, Jie Fang, Cadillac, Vauxhall, Baojun,

General Motors GM Is One
PAGES 25 WORDS 6236

" Conclusion Overall GM is currently confronting some of the most difficult obstacles that it has ever had to overcome. Government intervention is no guarantee that the company will be able to overcome these obstacles. Billions of dollars have been given to the company in an effort to save it from further demise. However, capital alone will not save the company, there must be a strategic effort of the management to properly

Introduction The automotive industry segment within the economy of the United States is a fundamental employer as well as a key donor of the American Gross National Product. The automotive industry segment is one that faces intense and comprehensive competition not only locally but also internationally. In recent times, the automotive industry has experienced deterioration in the revenues and profits generated and a decline in the market share as well as

(NCPP 2004) II. Performance Management in England and Wales: In Wales and England the National Policing Plan 2004-2007 was published in November 2003 with the stated aim of the plan being to: "Deliver policing to high national standards and for communities to be increasing engaged in the policing of their area." The stated plan is inclusive of a "framework for local police planning in England and Wales over the next three

Additionally, aside financial resources, they also used their assets. The most relevant example in this sense is the selling of part of its interests in Mazda. It as such transformed its assets into liquidities -- the 20% shares in Mazda were converted into $540 million (Murphy) -- that better allowed them to pursue their innovation objectives. The matter of technological innovation is not only a core focus of Ford's, but

Therefore, they use strict evaluation criteria to make choice among different alternatives. Keeping in view the strength of customers' bargaining power, Toyota and other automakers are expending huge amounts on advertisements and promotional campaigns to create awareness about their brands and convince these customers to prefer them over all other brands (Jenny & Scammon, 2010). 5. Internal Environmental Analysis for Toyota Motor Corporation 5.1. The Resources Types: Like other types of business