Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Steel Industry Background Term Paper

In retrospect, the industry failed to respond appropriately by lobbying for federal restrictions on imported steel instead of recognizing the need to embrace a newer technology in the form of modern oxygen furnaces as an improvement over the open-hearth furnaces that replaced the Bessemer process almost a century earlier. Similarly, steel industry leaders like the infamous U.S. Steel Company continued to ignore the reality of decreased quality of North American iron ore; instead of importing higher quality foreign raw material, they invested unwisely in the expensive refinement processes required by the use of lower grade American iron ore.

Management issues and worker relations also contributed to the decline of Pennsylvania steel. Traditionally, the ranks of steel industry management consisted of former steel workers who rose into leadership positions after decades of first-hand experience. In the post-industrial age, industry management followed the general

American big business trend of hiring management candidates whose credentials were academic rather than practical, one unanticipated consequence of which was a fundamental change in relationship between workers and management (Hoerr, p.37).

Whereas earlier generations of steelworkers took personal pride in their work, their product, and their industry, the late 1980s witnessed a fundamental change in that dynamic: steelworkers...

...

This attitude culminated in their habit of actually sleeping on the job during the overnight shift, further undermining production in an industry already struggling to compete with foreign manufacturers and to overcome costly management decisions to resist better business planning evident in countries like Japan (Hoerr, p.117).
In 1980, the Pennsylvania steel industry employed more than 100,000 workers;

before the end of the decade, that number had dwindled to barely one-fifth of its prior numbers. As a result, steel plants closed one after another and the entire economy of the Pittsburgh area shifted away from the steel industry. In some respects, the, decline of the American steel industry was the result of natural phenomenon in the form of depletion of its natural raw material resources; in other ways, it is more attributable to management mistakes within the industry that undermined its ability to readjust in light of modern realities. Ultimately, both probably combined, leading to an inevitable result.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Nevins, J., Commager, H.S. (1992) a Pocket History of the United States.

New York: Pocket Books

Hoerr, J. (1988) and the Wolf Finally Came: The Decline of the American Steel Industry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press


Cite this Document:

"Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Steel Industry Background" (2007, December 07) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pittsburgh-pennsylvania-steel-industry-background-33539

"Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Steel Industry Background" 07 December 2007. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pittsburgh-pennsylvania-steel-industry-background-33539>

"Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Steel Industry Background", 07 December 2007, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pittsburgh-pennsylvania-steel-industry-background-33539

Related Documents

history of unions in Western Pennsylvania is strong and rich. Factors including locality and population growth made western Pennsylvania, more specifically Pittsburgh, an ideal place for various industries. Sullivan (1955) asserts that Pennsylvania was ideal because it possessed many natural resources. The state possessed wooded mountains and fertile valleys. In addition, the state provided access to huge deposits of coal and iron ore. Sullivan (1955) the author also explains

52). Furthermore, Marx felt that money had "deprived the whole world, both the human world and nature, of their own proper value. Money is the alienated essence of man's work and existence; this essence dominates him and he worships it..." (Strathern, 2001, p. 52). From Marx's point-of-view, owners or holders of capital were in a position to exploit workers because of their "systematically privileged position within the market" (Pierson,

Lake Erie to the industrial and commercial markets of Northern Ohio, the state of Ohio, and the entire United States. BACKGROUND ON LAKE ERIE Lake Erie forms the northern boundary to the state of Ohio, separating the state from Canada. It is the fourth largest of the Great Lakes, and the 12th largest freshwater lake in the world. It provides significant drinking water to the surrounding cities and towns, and is

There would be other incidents of violence, and it is that part of Carnegie's history where we are able in retrospect to see him as a businessman in retrospect. There are some historians and researchers who believe that Carnegie and other wealthy men of the industrial era were not just men focused on building their industrial empires, but who were also focused on building world empires (Jenkins, Dominick, 2005, p.

However, Andrew Carnegie did give, and his money has indeed benefited many millions of people all around the world, and people today can make use of the many libraries that he has built, in order to acquire knowledge and thereby better themselves. It must be remembered that Andrew Carnegie had a strong belief in the meritocracy of the United States of America, and also that his free libraries would

76). As automation increasingly assumes the more mundane and routine aspects of work of all types, Drucker was visionary in his assessment of how decisions would be made in the years to come. "In the future," said Drucker, "it was possible that all employment would be managerial in nature, and we would then have progressed from a society of labor to a society of management" (Witzel, p. 76). The