Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Plato held that a just state would be run by philosopher guardians. Plato thinks that, given their education, talents, virtues and the way their lives would be controlled in his Republic, such people are the best possible rulers. Is he right about this?
One of the contradictions in Platonic philosophy is that its oligarchic structure of rule by philosopher kings who are 'the best' and 'most fit' to create a 'just' state embodies an antidemocratic and unjust philosophy. The idea that only those temperamentally fit to rule should rule has often been used to justify tyranny. Socrates, at the beginning of the Republic, calls for his listeners to strive to live a good life, not one that is merely pleasurable or self-serving. However, despite his calls for justice, a society which denies individual autonomy can never be just and dictatorships almost inevitably produce self-serving regimes.
At the beginning of the Republic, Socrates gets into a heated argument with Glaucon, who states that 'might makes right' and that all human beings will act unjustly if given ultimate power. Socrates states that the type of dictatorship advocated by Glaucon is morally wrong, because the best individuals are not able to rule, only the strongest and most brutish. However, Socrates also argues against the position advocated by Thrasymachus, who empowered ordinary people to argue their positions in courts of law. Socrates believes that only reasoned philosophers can know the truth and provide moral guidance, and manipulating words is not synonymous with morality. This also means that Socrates...
In this ideal world, the philosopher kings are not tempted to take advantage of their position, and it is assumed that the best can be easily selected, and they always will be right. These same sorts of assumptions are used to justify dictatorships today. The leader or leaders are deemed to be infallible, they derive their authority on the basis of military rather than popular rule, and no questioning of their authority is permitted by ordinary citizens.
Plato meant for his system of justice to counteract the belief that justice is merely serving the interests of the stronger, and treating enemies badly and friends well. Abstract principles are supposed to be embodied in the virtues of the philosopher-kings. The idea that they may serve themselves is supposedly counteracted by preventing them from having families or accumulating personal wealth. However, many instances of corruption have been manifested in societies such as the communist Soviet Union and Eastern Europe where officially accumulating wealth was forbidden, but party leaders used their offices and political power…
Works Cited
Korab-Karpowicz, W.J. Plato: Political Philosophy. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
2005. [31 May 2011] http://www.iep.utm.edu/platopol/
Plato's Philosopher King Plato and the Philosopher-King With the Allegory of the Cave, Plato expresses the notion that the best thing a philosopher can do is lead the people and that, in turn, a leader (king) must be a philosopher. Plato emphasizes this idea by equating the unenlightened citizens of his Republic to prisoners in chains (they are, in effect, chained by their ignorance of reality and transcendental truth). The philosopher is
Plato and Aristotle Metaphysics The idea of metaphysics is a complex idea that focuses on expanding beyond the mere realities of physics within the natural world. In a sense, this goes "beyond physics," in that the study of metaphysics is "devoted to matters that transcend the mundane concerns" expounded by those of practical scientists such as Einstein and Heisenberg (van Inwagen, Peter). So in a broad term, "metaphysics" attempts to delve deeply
Plato and Socrates -- Human Soul There are a number of philosophical tenets that have been the subject of intense scrutiny since humans coalesced into formal societies. Who are we as a species? Where do we fit in with the universe? What is morality? Do the ends justify the means? Moreover, most of all, why are we here and are we free to act as individuals toward greater good? Free will,
Additionally, Aristotle furthered the field of educational philosophy by creating subjects and a logical inquiry process, insisting that education be moral or ethical, and defining it as intertwined with politics to such a great extent that the best and most necessary education is a state-sponsored education (Chambliss 2008). Influence Toward My Educational Philosophy: Practically, Aristotle's creation of subjects and his primitive research, which set the foundation for further research, influenced my
Plato's work is idealistic and, as such, some of the rationale behind many of the conclusions he draws on do not necessarily have a logical or practical motivation. Nevertheless, they are logically tied to most of the assumptions he makes in his work, which is why his conclusions could, ideally, be transposed into the society he had projected. The most important conclusion of his work may be that each part
Plato's Educational Systems And Divisions Of Classes In The Republic On "Educating Philosopher Kings," the in Republic, trans. Robin Waterfield (Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 250-276. Unlike the democratic society of ancient Athens, Plato's philosophical conception of the self and state is based upon divisions of education, politics, and social stratum, rather than unity. Of course, it should be noted that even democratic Athenian conceptions of the larger body politic were divided into