Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Heroes occur -- within the conventions of Western drama and Western literature more generally -- within the context of tragedy, for it is the stresses of tragic situations that (typically) allow for heroism to arise. But we can -- especially if we use the lenses of gender and queer theory -- see that Shakespeare has written a comedic play that nevertheless allows for heroism to come through. At least temporarily. Shakespeare underscores the heroism of his characters through the simple device of giving us "Hero." This might seem to be either heavy-handed or so obvious as to be meaningless, but to take this view is to privilege the point of the twenty-first century audience or reader.
As citizens of the postmodern world, we are used to (and ever expect) for different literary and artistic tropes to be mixed together: We are not surprised when tragic elements end up in comedies (or vice versa) like some literary form of recombinant DNA. However, the world of Shakespeare's audiences would have expected comedies to keep to the rules. Shakespeare -- in his opus as a while as well as in Much Ado About Nothing walks a very narrow and vertiginous line between following the conventions of his times and innovating new hybrid forms. (This is, of course, the essential nature of his genius -- shown perhaps to best advantage actually in his sonnets.)
Shakespeare gave his audience much of what they expected in a comedy -- all those complications, disguises, and misunderstandings about the nature of love. And all those -- at least putatively, or superficially -- happily-ever-after marriages. However, he also plays around the rules of comedy, and does so along gender lines. One of the cleverest aspects of this play is the fact that Hero is actually less heroic that Beatrice and Benedict. This is a nice piece of misdirection on the playwright's part, exactly analogous to the magician's holding up a wriggling white rabbit to get your attention while doing something else. We are literally given a hero as a clue that something -- well, actually rather postmodern -- is up. But not in the first place that we are looking for it.
It is hard not to see Benedict and Beatrice -- both introduced to us as characters who have forsworn traditional ideas of (heterosexual) marriage -- as two representations or embodiments of the same person. They are this play's version of Twelfth Night's Viola and Sebastion, a representation of a being that is a complex combination of both sex and gender and so of desire(s) that are not neatly categorized into traditional (straight) ideas about partnership. Beatrice and Benedict both recognize (and have done so for much of their lives) that the traditional marriage of their historical moment and culture is too narrow a world for them. This understanding is not expressed (at least in the script -- although this might not have been the case in the staging of the play) in terms of homosexual desire. This is hardly surprising given the ways in which sexuality was both constrained and understood at the time. But their simple refusal to accept without reservation the sexual (and marital) norms of their time would have provided the play's audiences with an essentially rebellious, and even potentially revolutionary perspective that sexuality could in fact be negotiated.
But only -- of course -- so far. Much Ado About Nothing is, of course, a comedy, and an English Renaissance comedy at that. Beatrice and Benedict are allowed to rebel, to push against conventional sexuality and marriage, but only temporarily. By the end of the play, social expectations have intervened, and the two are happily (and conventionally) married. But, despite this predictable ending, the fact that Shakespeare has introduced the possibility that not all people spend their lives desiring conventional heterosexuality allows for a more complicated set of conclusions. As is true of other comedies -- notably Taming of the Shrew and Measure for Measure, we are left both celebrating conventional pairings and asking ourselves, as the house lights come up and we leave the theater, whether we have indeed witnessed a comedy or a tragedy wrapped up (as if in drag) as a comedy.
Marlowe, Christopher. "Hero and Leander." Classic Literature Library. 1 December 2009.
"Hero" www.etymonline.com. 2005. 1 December 2009. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php? l=h&p=6
Hamilton, Sharon. Shakespeare's Daughters. New York: McFarland & Company, 2007.[continue]
"Roles Of Gender And Sexuality" (2009, December 01) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/roles-of-gender-and-exuality-16861
"Roles Of Gender And Sexuality" 01 December 2009. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/roles-of-gender-and-exuality-16861>
"Roles Of Gender And Sexuality", 01 December 2009, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/roles-of-gender-and-exuality-16861
Moreover, in addition to narrowing the purview of human sexuality to groups within the larger society, the sociocultural aspect examines social norm influences including the effects of external factors such as mass media or politics. These movements can assist in bring about significant and widespread changes in the social norm, such as the sexual revolution and the advent of feminism. Overview of Theory and Practice Theories regarding gender and sexuality date
Gender and Sexuality Define sex. The term sex means those characteristics, biological as well as physiological, that define men and women. Sex is better defined by categorizing sexes such as make and females. Major characteristic of sex is that its aspects do not considerably change within different societies. To further explain, specific sex related examples are that women menstruate and have breasts developed capable of lactation. Such characteristics are absent in male
A third reason is that members of the staff or leadership teams are barely taught to think of and use gender in delicate ways. A last reason given is that without the gender justice lens, the work of social justice organizations and the feminist movement overall will be negatively impacted. 11.) Describe the author's arguments in regards to the 3 aspects you listed in #2. First, democracy was viewed as only
A complete act of sexual intercourse cannot occur with an unaroused male, but can occur with an unaroused female. That is simply biology. Sex may be far superior when a woman is aroused, but even desperately unwilling and unaroused women can physically engage in sex. That scenario, at least for heterosexual situations, is not the same for men. A certain level of arousal is needed for men to be
In addition, the researcher note that the relatively small sample size in their study did not allow separate genetic analyses for males and females (Coolidge et al.). Environmentalism (social influence). A recent study by Wallien and Cohen-Kettenis (2008) analyzed psychosexual outcomes of gender-dysphoric children at 16 years and older to determine childhood characteristics related to psychosexual outcomes based on various social influences that may be experienced during the timeframes studied.
In fact, they allowed her to play, and then seemed to structure the entire game around keeping the ball away from her, except for allowing her to actually score; in an action that the observer was forced to conclude was intentional. Two of the men playing that game asked the author for her phone number after the game. No groups of men allowed the author to join the game
Gender and Sexuality In these two readings both authors look at the way various media view and determine the societal perception and response to women and women's issues. Both authors are concerned with questioning and interrogating the way women and gender are seen and perceived. There are however marked differences in their approaches and subject matter. Clover in her work Men, Women and Chainsaws views the way gender is reflected and