Science And Religion The Debate Essay

Religious fundamentalism became the basis for many of the often violent interactions between the different cultures, religions, and ways of life. This was the basis for later violence against all who did not agree with the religious norm, for example in events such as the Salem Witch Trials. Today, this same fundamentalism insists that every word in the Bible or other religious documents should be taken literally. According to this view, the story of creation simply could not agree with Darwinism. The long American history of using religion as a basis for many actions, both good an bad, plays an important role in this.

However, it is also true that there is an increasing trend within Christianity to return to the earlier point-of-view, accepting both Darwinism and creationism as complements of each other, rather than rivals. This school of thought suggests that the Bible is a symbolic presentation...

...

In Darwin's day, there was much greater acceptance for the fact that everything is not yet known, and probably never will be. It is also encouraging, however, that there is a gradual and new understanding that there can be a middle ground between two extremes. It is no longer necessary to burn either witches or scientists when neither does the world any harm. The greatest tragedy would be if intellectual discovery were eliminated in favor of a narrow view of life and religion, which does not recognize any viewpoint other than its own.
Reference

McGrath, a.E. (1999) Science & Religion: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

McGrath, a.E. (1999) Science & Religion: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.


Cite this Document:

"Science And Religion The Debate" (2011, February 07) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/science-and-religion-the-debate-4677

"Science And Religion The Debate" 07 February 2011. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/science-and-religion-the-debate-4677>

"Science And Religion The Debate", 07 February 2011, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/science-and-religion-the-debate-4677

Related Documents

Perhaps the essential myth of all those that exist is that of the cosmogony, or the birth of the universe. This myth has taken incredibly many forms in the course of history, but it should be noticed that all of these forms postulate the existence of a divine will behind the creation of the world, be it a single God as in Christian doctrine or many divinities as in

Religion and or Science
PAGES 5 WORDS 1625

Religion or Science? Since the Renaissance, there has been a vocal debate between religion and science. Galileo was imprisoned and sanctioned because of his views of the universe, the sun, and the way planets moved. As science progressed, this debate became even more heated. However, in the late 20th century, there has also been a mitigating discussion about the way that religion and science can actual coexist as explanations of the

Science and Religion Does science discredit religion? In general we have the sense that, historically speaking, it does -- but only because so much of the historical conflict between science and religion has hinged upon the way in which scientific advances have disproved factual claims that were advanced by religion, or (as Worrall phrases it) where religion is "directly inconsistent with well-accredited scientific theories…the erstwhile religious claim…must, from a rational point-of-view,

Religion Has Been on the
PAGES 4 WORDS 1397

Glynn concludes that fundamentalists exist not only in the Creationism Camp, but in the Evolutionism camp as well, regretting the unfortunate irony that Evolutionism Fundamentalists are attempting to suffocate constructive dialogue in much the same way Catholic Priests did in the past. e. Thomas Demere and Steve Walsh -- Creationism Should Not Be Taught In Public Schools Demere and Walsh argue that teaching a non-disprovable theory like Creationism would further weaken

This occurred in 330 BC, and Zoroaster's date would then be 588 BC, and this date we may take to refer to the initial success of his prophetic mission which consisted in the conversion of King Visht-spa when Zoroaster was forty years old. Since he is traditionally said to have lived seventy-seven years, we will not be far wrong in dating him at 628-551 BC. It seems also to

There are exceptions, where legal ramifications are employed and individuals are held to account for their inaction. For most people, including myself the idea that faith is the only solution to medical concerns, and especially emergent ones is unfathomable. Medical care is congruent with faith, as even for the most ardent believer in God if God had not meant for children to be cured of preventable a treatable disease