System Of Checks And Balances And Separation Of Powers Under The US Constitution Essay

System of Checks and Balances Power

The concept of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances is more or less the same thing. Both of these ideas were introduced into the government to ensure that one branch of the government does not have all the power. Another reason it was introduced was so that the responsibilities and duties are distributed among different areas to ensure that the government is doing its job perfectly. Separation of Powers is basically a model of government in which various parts of the government have different tasks. The three different branches of the United States government are Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Before we get into the history of separation of powers, it is only necessary to tell which branch is in charge of what activities.

The legislative branch is basically the Congress and its major responsibility is to approve acts and make them into laws. It deals with laws regarding trade, business, safety and other important factors....

...

The Judicial branch concerns the courts and all their dealings. The executive branch is basically concerning the president and the cabinet. Separation of Powers was first applied in a government model in Greece and then was continued to be used in the Roman Republic.
This goes on to divide the government into distinct and independent areas. This is quite crucial because it states that no one branch of the government has more power than the other. If we look at the branches regarding the laws that are in the country, it is seen that the legislative branch creates the laws, the judicial branch interprets the laws and the executive branch goes on to enforce these laws.

It was stated earlier that one branch does not have all the power. To make things more complex and fair, each branch has some amount of power over the other branch. This is carried out so one branch doesn't dominate the government and does not attain the entire control. This concept is therefore known…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Factmonster.com (2007). Checks and Balances | FactMonster.com. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0777009.html [Accessed: 28 Jul 2013].

Ncsl.org (2005). Separation of Powers -- An Overview. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/legislatures/separation-of-powers-an-overview.aspx [Accessed: 28 Jul 2013].


Cite this Document:

"System Of Checks And Balances And Separation Of Powers Under The US Constitution" (2013, July 28) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/system-of-checks-and-balances-and-separation-97450

"System Of Checks And Balances And Separation Of Powers Under The US Constitution" 28 July 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/system-of-checks-and-balances-and-separation-97450>

"System Of Checks And Balances And Separation Of Powers Under The US Constitution", 28 July 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/system-of-checks-and-balances-and-separation-97450

Related Documents
Constitution Debates
PAGES 5 WORDS 1619

Constitution Debates During the intellectual debate over the Constitution, the Anti-Federalist case against the Federalists' proposed system of checks and balances was made in a number of different ways. It is worth understanding the logic of the Anti-Federalists' arguments before we turn to the Federalist response to those arguments. A first case made against checks and balances is an obvious one: that it diminishes direct accountability to the people on the part

In the older forms, people could live and work in relative independence if they disengaged from politics. Under a modern totalitarian government, people are completely and utterly dependent on, and submissive to, the rule and whims of a political party and its leaders. Older forms of such a government ruled by divine right, while the modern totalitarian state is ruled and run by a dictator who controls a political

That with the limitations articulated in the constitution that gives the people some declarative authority in how government is suppose to run then the common man would feel his or her best interest would be represented (Brandes 2009). That is, in part, the reason why the language for the preamble was so carefully worded, to seem all-inclusive. This all inclusiveness though, also inherently, and at the time, did not include

Australian Constitution The Creation of Federal Laws in Australia The Commonwealth of Australia was created with the 1901 unification of six recently independent British colonies. All were solidified under the authorship of a Constitution that same year which predicated the form of government and the legal orientation of the new nation. (AG, p. 1) In doing so, it also vested the power to create federal laws in Australian Parliament and, in one

The Constitution is based on several key principals the most notable would include: separation of powers as well as checks and balances. Separation of powers is when there are clearly defined powers that are given to the various branches of: the government, the federal government and the states. Checks and balances is when one branch of the government will have the power to the check the authority of another

These words, 'necessary and proper,' in such an instrument, are probably to be considered as synonymous. Necessarily, powers must here intend such powers as are suitable and fitted to the object; such as are best and most useful in relation to the end proposed. If this be not so, and if congress could use no means but such as were absolutely indispensable to the existence of a granted power,