Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
While this ensures that there will be no plotting against the state, it also means that dissidents must fear for their lives if they disagree with the dictates of their rulers and desire to talk about it. This is essentially censorship and control of speech coded in the language of open deliberation, and it reveals another problem inherent in Utopian society.
Here, More is not attempting to present an ideal alternative to European society, but rather demonstrate how any society that sits at the extreme end of an ideological spectrum, as Utopia and Europe both did, will have problems which stem from the actions necessary to maintain that social order. In Europe, kings fought seemingly pointless wars in order to maintain their power and legitimacy, and in Utopia, the state executed anybody who talked about it outside the officially recognized channels. In both instances, human life becomes subordinate to the perpetuation of the state, revealing how seemingly disparate societies can nevertheless create and perpetuate the same problems, albeit flavored differently depending on the specific society. This same phenomenon is true when one considers the religions of Utopia.
In Utopia, "there are several sorts of religions," and they are, in general, treated equally, but atheists are roundly condemned, based largely on a faulty assumption about what motivates or demotivates religious and non-religious people. More notes that atheists are viewed:
As scarce fit to be counted men, since they degrade so noble a being as the soul, and reckon it no better than a beat's: thus they are far from looking on such men as fit for human society, or to be citizens of a well-ordered commonwealth; since a man of such principles must needs, as oft as he dares do it, despise all their laws and customs: for there is no doubt to be made that a man who is afraid of nothing but the law, and apprehends nothing after death, will not scruple to break through all the laws of his country, either by fraud or force, when by this means he may satisfy his appetites. (More 121)
While this passage is undoubtedly influenced by More's own religious belief, and thus may be read as essentially a piece of pro-religion propaganda, it is worth noting because it demonstrates how once again Utopia does not represent a true utopia, but rather a problematic society just like any other, albeit problematic in ways not previously imagined. Where sixteenth-century England was ripe with religious persecution, Utopia allows for the practice of religion freely, without conflict. However, not believing in any religion is still considered anathema to society, and thus atheists are held in contempt and disgust. This is because some of the state's power actually comes from granting the right to practice religion freely; by making the freedom of religion a law, the state is implicitly arguing that it has the authority and legitimacy to dictate what people feel and think. Atheism contradicts this assumption, because it recognizes that the state is effectively legislating imaginary things, and as such has no authority except for what it granted to it by the people. Thus, the fear that atheists will break the law is in actuality a fear that atheists realize that the law itself is not divine, but rather man-made and thus subject to all the same errors and problems inherent in anything produced by humanity.
Thomas More's Utopia is particularly interesting for the way it fails to represent an actual Utopia; there are slaves and criminals, citizens can be put to death for talking about the state in private, and atheists are condemned and harassed because they do not subscribe to superstition. Rather than attempt to parse More's particular position on these aspects of society, it is more productive to examine how their inclusion in Utopia reveals the problems inherent in human society as such. In the end, it becomes clear that in Utopia and elsewhere, the dominant problems of human society stem from the state's need to constantly assert its power and legitimacy, both by murdering dissidents and creating social outcasts of those who might point out that the state is dependent on the people, and not any divine intervention.
"Utopia Thomas More's Utopia Is" (2012, May 07) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/utopia-thomas-more-is-57217
"Utopia Thomas More's Utopia Is" 07 May 2012. Web.5 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/utopia-thomas-more-is-57217>
"Utopia Thomas More's Utopia Is", 07 May 2012, Accessed.5 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/utopia-thomas-more-is-57217
Thomas More's Utopia Thomas More's "Utopia" Thomas More's Utopia and Religious Toleration More than an account of a fictional society, Thomas More's Utopia is a criticism of early Renaissance European society. On the island of "Utopia" people live together in peace and harmony, experience freedom and prosperity, and worship any religious tradition they see fit. Thomas More used the book to criticize the political, economic, legal, and religious aspects of European society in
Thomas More's Utopia as a Criticism of 16th Century England There are several notions put in utopia by Thomas More. There is the religious aspect, power sharing and the evils of the private property contrasts in the contemporary England in the 16th century. The Utopian creation by More is a satirical mirroring of the society as well as his own life. His audiences attracted despite their opposition of the idea of
Utopia is concomitantly possible and impossible: it is all up to people to get actively involved in making such a scenario possible. Individuals can actually create such an environment as long as they are willing to act in accordance with legislations promoted by More when writing Utopia. The fact that the utopian society has strict rules meant to control people's behavior by preventing them from putting across immoral behavior plays
The literary methods that More employs are analogous to those utilized by Galileo Galilei just over a half century later. Galileo also approached a delicate subject with regard to the Church in a hypothetical and fictitious manner. He had uncovered valid and relatively conclusive evidence that the earth revolved around the sun. Yet, this discovery was a direct contradiction of preexisting clerical interpretations of the scriptures. Even though Galileo was
And so the ache for meaning goes unrelieved." Utopia as a philosophy is also reflected in McMillian's discussion of the nature of this concept in the post-modern society or the society that is information technology-oriented. He asserted that "...utopia doesn't always have to be a particular type of society; it can also be a process, a liberated way of thinking, an exercise in collective self-definition," an argument that presents
WOMEN AND FEMINISM IN SIR THOMAS MORE'S UTOPIA First published in 1516, Sir Thomas More's Utopia is considered as one of the most influential works of Western humanism. Through the first-person narrative of Raphael Hythloday, More's mysterious traveler, Utopia is described as a pagan communist city-state or polis governed by intellect and rationality. By addressing such issues as religious pluralism, women's rights, state-sponsored education, colonialism and justified warfare, the main protagonist
Utopia In Thomas More's 1516 Utopia, the flaws of European society are revealed in typical Enlightenment style. That is, More champions individual rights and freedoms and disparages state or Church control. More seems particularly concerned with thought control and the prescription of social norms and behaviors. In Utopia, Raphael Hythloday describes a world that is only partly utopic. There is a degree of gender equity, at least compared with European sixteenth-century