Value of U S Dollar Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Down? The Value of the Dollar

International Currency Exchanges

Current Trends and Initiatives

Impact of the Euro on Dollar Valuation

Analysis of Current Trends and Initiatives on Dollar Valuation in the Future

Up or Down? The Value of the Dollar: A Historical Analysis of the Valuation of the U.S. Dollar

According to Michael Artis, Elizabeth Hennessy, and Axel Weber (2000), capital losses can be caused by differential changes in the value of assets and liabilities, primarily exchange rate changes; these changes affect the value of a central bank's foreign exchange reserves. To date, exchange rate changes have only been a major problem for national central banks with very large foreign exchange reserves (i.e., Portugal); however, it might also become a problem for the European Central Bank in the future, whose balance sheet on the asset side will be dominated by the approximately 40 billion euro in foreign exchange reserves it has called up from the national central banks as of the end of 1999 (Artis et al. 208). The strength of the euro compared to the U.S. dollar has been growing in recent months, and economists are of mixed opinions about the impact on the valuation of the dollar as the European Union continues to gain economic momentum as it streamlines it trading practices.

Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study will be to examine the historical basis for the valuation of the U.S. dollar, the impact of recent trends and initiatives including but not limited to the euro, and an analysis of how these factors will serve to affect the dollar's valuation in the future.

Importance of Study

A country's nominal exchange rate is defined as the actual foreign exchange quotation in contrast to the real exchange rate, which has been adjusted for changes in purchasing power (Harvey 2004). Artis et al. (2000) suggest that it is reasonable to assume that the nominal exchange rate will be a key element in determining the level of competitiveness of a country, which in turn will be an increasingly important factor in stock market valuations in the future.

Scope of Study

This study will examine a wide range of international currencies, with an emphasis on the world's leading economies besides the U.S. And EU such as China, Japan, Korea, and others, with a particular emphasis on how these currencies have tended to interact with the U.S. dollar over the years. Current theories concerning currency valuation techniques will be provided, and statistical analyses will be carried out where appropriate.

Overview of the Study

According to Mike Luck, Rob Pocock, and Mike Tricker (2000), "In its crudest form, exploratory research produces endless series of descriptive statistics, correlation analyses and multi-way cross-tabulations that encompass every conceivable permutation and combination of variables in the hope of finding something significant" (153). Therefore, this study will use an exploratory approach to review the relevant and peer-reviewed literature to develop fresh insights and theories concerning what can be expected as these increasingly powerful international valuation forces come to bear on the U.S. dollar in the future.

Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature

Background and Overview: International Currency Exchanges. While it may not be hard to believe that people are making money in the international currency exchange market, it is difficult to understand how they are doing it. After all, if there was a magic formula whereby accurate predictions could be consistently made concerning an individual currency's likely behavior against another currency, that formula would eventually become known and it would be boom times for everyone. Alas, such a magic formula does not exist but that has not stopped analysts from trying for the past 400 years. In fact, much of the existing mechanisms of transnational trade were introduced during the last four centuries; international currency exchanges, the joint stock company, marine insurance, international arbitration, bills of lading, and the stock market all fueled international trade and therefore interest in international currency exchanges (Arthurs 1996:132).

More recently, the increasing globalization of the world's economy has compelled analysts to redouble their efforts at understanding how market forces and world events all affect the rise and fall of a nation's currency. In fact, the same pressures that served to hasten the development of international trade over the past 400 years are the same ones taking place today: "At the core of it all, globalization - then as now - was about wealth and dreams of wealth" (Arthurs 133). In this regard, foreign exchange represents both an opportunity and a potential liability if handled inappropriately. According to Laux, Pantzalis and Simkins (2001), "Investors are concerned with the impact of unexpected changes in the exchange rate on their portfolio values, while managers who typically are over-invested in their own firms are primarily concerned with the exposure of their firms. Risk aversion provides an incentive to manage foreign exchange risk" (793). The authors define foreign exchange exposure as the effect of unexpected changes in the real exchange rate on firms, and distinguish between two types of economic exposure:

1) Transaction exposure (this is the effect of unexpected changes in the nominal exchange rate on cash flows associated with monetary assets and liabilities such as contractually fixed cash flows); and

2) Transaction exposure (this is usually a short-term exposure that can be easily hedged using currency derivatives) (Laux et al. 794).

By contrast, operating exposure is the effect of unexpected changes in the exchange rate on the cash flows that are associated with a company's non-monetary (real) assets and liabilities. According to these authors, "Operating exposure results from unexpected changes in the exchange rate on the firm's input costs (e.g., raw materials, labor costs, etc.) and output prices (e.g., product prices)" (794). Further, because the correlation of prices with exchange rates is determined by the extent of segmentation within their respective markets, operating exposure will depend on whether input costs and output prices are influenced on a local or global level (Laux et al. 795). Taken together, these risks and opportunities are all based on how the U.S. dollar has been historically valued; these issues are discussed further below.

Current Trends and Initiatives. According to Richard N. Cooper, the U.S. current account deficit reached $450 billion in 2001, or 4.4% of the nation's GDP; this was a 3.6% from 1999. In fact, current account balance was last achieved in 1991 (actually, in 1981 if the First Persian Gulf War-related expenses are excluded for 1991). "One has to go back to the two decades before 1914," Cooper says, "a period of mass immigration and extensive infrastructure construction, to find deficits even approximately as large, relative to GDP, as those of recent years" (217). By global standards, the U.S. is regarded to be relatively rich in capital; the questions emerge then, as to why the U.S. has been importing more capital than ever before?

There are two clear trends in thinking evident in the growing body of literature on the impact of foreign debt on the U.S. dollar in this regard. In their essay, "The Looming U.S. External Debt. How Serious is It?," Susan Charrette and Juann Hung (1997) report that, "When the United States first became a net debtor in the mid-1980s, some analysts worried that the prospect of an escalating U.S. foreign debt would cause foreigners to become unwilling to hold dollar assets, precipitating a sudden depreciation of the dollar. Such a scenario was thought to be plausible since a continued rise in the U.S. external deficit would lead to rapid accumulation of external debt" (32). Having receded for a number of years, though, this lingering doubt about the U.S. external debt has reemerged in the public forum. According to Charrette and Hung, as a result of the United States becoming the world's largest net international debtor, some observers have blamed the net international debt for depressing the dollar: "They argue that the weak dollar should signal policymakers to act now in order to redress the continuing buildup of U.S. international debt" (32). By contrast, other financial analysts suggest that this concern about external deficits and debt accumulation is unwarranted; provided that a significant share of the net borrowing from abroad is directed toward investment, the accumulation of external debt should not be a reason for worry. "As long as foreign debt is incurred for productive investment and its cost is lower than the rate of return on its investment," the authors point out, "the United States should profit from foreign borrowing" (Charrette & Hung 33). Beyond these two schools of thought, though, there is a new major player in the international currency exchange marketplace that is having profound effects on the valuation of the U.S. dollar in some unpredictable ways; these issues are discussed further below.

Impact of the Euro on Dollar Valuation. According to Cooper (2001), the increasing purchase of euros places some amount of downward pressure on the dollar, thereby reducing some of the exchange rate pressures on U.S. producers; these pressures are taking place during a period when some…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Value Of U S Dollar" (2005, May 10) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from

"Value Of U S Dollar" 10 May 2005. Web.21 October. 2016. <>

"Value Of U S Dollar", 10 May 2005, Accessed.21 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • U S Dollar Which Is Heavily

    As the result of this, government cannot raise interest rates and may need to halt interest rates where they are. While lower interest rates allow borrowing, higher interest rates may actually serve those better who have already invested in bonds and securities. But if U.S. cannot move interest rates around for fear of further halting economic activity then dollar is in constant danger of doing further down. So the main

  • U S Dollar Currency

    macroeconomics, the U.S. Dollar appears to be the currency holding the greatest global power. Indeed, it is the dominant reserve currency (Liu), now comprising 68% of global reserves, while just a decade ago the dollar accounted for 51% of global currency reserves. Because it is so globally prominent, even minor changes in the economy influences the power and performance of the dollar. It appears that recent market influences and

  • Strength of U S Dollar in Relation to

    Strength of U.S. Dollar in Relation to the Exchange Rate. There is no question that most people consider a "strong dollar" to be an overall good thing. After all, it just feels good to change one's U.S. dollars for Canadian ones, for example -- it makes one feel ahead of the game before setting foot outside of the exchange building. However, as joyful as one might feel in the initial stages

  • U S Government and Ethical Issues of Outsourcing

    U.S. Government and ethical issues of outsourcing Description of Ideas-5 Analysis of Concepts-6 Evaluation with Reasons-7 Possible Solutions-9 U.S Government and Ethical Issues of Outsourcing USA is at present one of the fastest growing countries as a target for outsourcing. Of late outsourcing which was once the buzzword of corporate America has been looked down upon in recent years because of growing concerns of ethics involved in outsourcing the same. Majority lament the outsourcing of jobs

  • U S Macro Economy Which Was Considered to

    U.S. Macro economy economy which was considered to be the world's largest has still not been able to recover completely from the financial crisis and resulting recession that hit in 2008. At the national level, spending increase to more than 25% of GDP in 2010, later in 2011 gross public debt exceeded 100% of GDP. The process of recovery for U.S. economy in the first quarter turned out to be weaker

  • U S Trade Balance & Exchange

    4 trillion to about $5 trillion dollars at the end of 2008 to support a rise in U.S. net external debt from $3.3 trillion to $7.4 trillion. (Ibid. 6) Continued financing of the U.S. trade deficits by the rest of the world is also not without its long-term problems: the U.S. would accumulate so much debt over time that the ultimate cost of adjustment would become too high for the

  • U S Trade Deficit United States

    S. economy, causing job losses that reach into the most technologically advanced industries in the manufacturing sector and affect every state, according to a January 11 press release by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission" (U.S. Info State Government, 2005). Also, these job losses not only negatively impact the population, but they also affect the business community. With fewer workers and resources, American companies will no longer be able

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved