Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Vietnam
Leadership of Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy in the Post-War Era
The United States emerged after the end of World War II as the most powerful nation on earth and in the history of mankind. American political, economic, and military power was unmatched by any other nation, although the Soviet Union eventually built a comparable nuclear force. With that enormous power also came great responsibility to lead the Western world in the struggle against International Communism. Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy acted within the context and confines of this historical development. Their actions and leadership styles were strongly influenced by world events and also domestic concerns. In George Moss's Vietnam: an American ordeal, Eisenhower emerges as a decisive leader whose liberty to act was contained by domestic politics, while Kennedy emerges a weak decision-maker although pressured by international events and domestic politics.
Eisenhower was a military leader and as such believed in American military power and was a resolved leader. Whereas President Truman wanted a political settlement of the Indochina crisis, Eisenhower believed that the problem could...
He supported French attempts to re-take Indochina. Eisenhower was not fond of antiquated French colonial ambitions but he feared Communist expansion more. So, he wanted the French to continue fighting. Despite his encouragement, however, the French wanted a negotiated settlement with the Vietnamese, especially after a fiasco at Dien Bien Phu. When the French forces were defeated there, Eisenhower was ready to intervene militarily. But he could not do so without congressional support and the participation of America's allies, particularly the British. When Eisenhower and his Secretary John Foster Dulles met Democratic and Republican senators, the latter told the President that the Senate would not approve an American military intervention without an assured cooperation of America's allies in Europe (Moss, 2010, p. 36). In numerous later instances, Eisenhower expressed his willingness to intervene in Vietnam.
In contrast, President Kennedy was unresolved in political affairs. He talked tough and even accused his predecessor of being "soft" on Communism -- ironically his Republican rivals accused him of the exact same thing -- and warned the Soviets in several instances…
References:
Moss, G. (2010). Vietnam, an American ordeal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vietnam: An American Ordeal Sixth Edition George Donelson Moss© 2010. You book. Given emerging role United States mid-20th century world affairs online textbook, evaluation made leadership styles Presidents Dwight Eisenhower John Kennedy made effective inhibited effectiveness? Why United States direct leadership President important. When assessing the effectiveness of Eisenhower's and Kennedy's leaderships, it is important to place their presidencies in the historical context. Both served in the aftermath of the Second
Leadership United States had been involved with the world affairs from 18th century to the present and its most prominent role was during the pre-world war era and post-world war affairs of the world. Particularly when President Dwight Eisenhower and John Kennedy ruled, the economic prosperity of the United States began to grow on a vast scale. Their eras were considered the most successful era for United States in relation to economic
Although Diem initially appeared to assist the Westerners in their efforts to install democracy in the country he proved to be corrupt, being more interested in his own well-being and in his financial situation than in conditions in the country. The Vietnamese were determined to support theories relating to personal leadership because they could no longer accept being controlled by the French, the Japanese, or by the Americans. It was
Vietnam War A majority of the American wars have had obvious starting points like the capture of Fort Sumter in 1861, the battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775, the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the invasion of North Korea into South Korea in June 1950. However, for the war in Vietnam, there is no fixed beginning. The United States got into that war incrementally via a series of
U.S. involvement in Vietnam remains one of the most controversial actions the U.S. government has ever undertaken. It has divided the country like never before. The divisions took place along political, class, and racial lines. Partly because of the inability of the U.S. To win the war and partly because many thought the war was wrong and even immoral, politicians sharply divided over the war. Many Americans resisted the draft,
Fred I. Greenstein, The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to Barack Obama, Third Edition. Princeton University Press, 2009. Fred I. Greenstein's central point The Presidential Difference is that in the modern U.S. political system since the Great Depression and Second World War, the presidents are now they key actors, far more so than the pre-1933 period when Congress was the most important branch of government. Because the role of