Oedipus The King And The Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1657
Cite

Another tragic feature of Ranevskaya's character that makes her uniquely 'modern' is that she knows her flaws. She admits that she squanders money, while Oedipus seems unaware of his arrogance until the very end of the play. Chekhov's subtlety as a playwright is that he knows that people can do the wrong thing, 'know' that they are doing wrong, and still act against their best interests in a foolish fashion. Hence, unlike the ancient Greek tragedy of circumstance, Chekov's play is a tragedy of character. The people around Ranevskaya, including her daughter as well as Lopakhin, seem powerless to stop the woman in her path to folly, but Ranevskaya also seems powerless to stop herself, even though she is an apparently intelligent, if prodigal woman.

One recent review of a production of the Cherry Orchard stated: "Much of the pleasure of this vibrantly acted tale of missed opportunities…comes from the funny, forlorn spectacle of displaced people trying to pretend they're perfectly at home" (Brantley 2009:1). In Oedipus...

...

However, Ranevskaya feels that she is at home, even though she should understand that unless she acts, she is swiftly about to be displaced by the new order of Lopakhin, whose power rests in money, not ancient history. The Greek tragedy ends with an image of a man who, despite all of his best efforts to avoid committing a crime, is condemned by the gods to suffer; the modern tragicomedy depicts a woman who ignores all practical offers of aid. Oedipus' hubris manifests itself primarily in his desire to resist the pressures of external circumstances like fate; Ranevskaya's character is so fatally flawed she seems almost to embrace her financial demise. [THESIS RESTATEMENT].
Works Cited

Brantley, Ben. "All alone in a crowded country home." The New York Times. January 16, 2009.

[February 5, 2011] http://theater.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/theater/reviews/16orch.html

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Brantley, Ben. "All alone in a crowded country home." The New York Times. January 16, 2009.

[February 5, 2011] http://theater.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/theater/reviews/16orch.html


Cite this Document:

"Oedipus The King And The" (2011, February 05) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/oedipus-the-king-and-the-11403

"Oedipus The King And The" 05 February 2011. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/oedipus-the-king-and-the-11403>

"Oedipus The King And The", 05 February 2011, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/oedipus-the-king-and-the-11403

Related Documents

Oedipus is one of the most famous names in Greek mythology. His name has become both a psychological complex as well as a familiar joke. His story has come to be a synonym as well for the capriciousness of fate. But a truer picture of the character of Oedipus suggests that, rather than being an unwitting victim, Oedipus a clear hand in his own demise. Despite its reputation, Sophocles' play

Oedipus's Tragic Flaws Oedipus Rex is the classic story of Oedipus, King of Thebes, a tragic hero whose fate was in the hands of supernatural forces and who was doomed to murder his father and marry his mother. In the play, Oedipus has many characteristics that allow him to be labeled a tragic hero. The philosopher Aristotle states that a tragic hero is an influential person that because of an error

Oedipus as Tragic Hero In most dramatic plays, tragedy usually strikes the protagonist of the play and leads him, or her, to experience devastating losses. While tragic instances can be avoided, there are other instances where one's fate and future is out of the protagonist's control. In Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles and first performed around 249 BC, Oedipus cannot escape his destiny and even though he tries to overcome

However, the play goes even further than these hints in demonstrating the irrelevance of any supernatural force to the story's action when Tiresias mocks Oedipus for suggesting that the blind seer is the source of the plague (Sophocles 27). When Oedipus accuses Tiresias of a being "a conspirator" to Laius' murder due to his reluctance to tell what he knows, Tiresias responds by asking "Sooth sayest thou?" (Sophocles 26-27). While

This is because they are not learning from the lessons of the past and they do not see things for what they really are. When this takes place, there is a possibility that they are open to more problems through failing to understand and address critical issues. Oedipus is used to show this sense of arrogance and contempt for the truth. (Sophocles) ("The Oedipus Plays") Evidence of this can be

Oedipus the King At the beginning of Oedipus the King by Sophocles, Oedipus clearly sees it as his purpose in life to be the best leader he can. In his mind, this meant to be as close to his people as possible, especially when the play opens and the land being in trouble. This is clear in what he says to those who come to him with the problem of their