16 results for "Animal Testing Essays"

Filter results by:

View Full Essay

Testing Make Up On Animals Essay

Words: 1695 Length: 5 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper #: 12371271

Animal Rights

The amount of heed to be given regarding the rights of animals has remained to be a heated argument these past few years due to the new, innovative ways of people and their treatment of animals in various situations. The most common concern of those worried about animals is the method of scientists to test products on animals to see how successful they are and whether the products may potentially cause harm to humans if they use them.

Animal testing has numerous categories. While a few scientists make use of animals for medicinal experiments, others may use it to test the safety of cosmetics and other products for human use. The key factor due to which this argument has still gone on is the constant questioning as to why one should care about animals and the danger to them when we test products on them. A common misconception has also successfully spread amongst people that after animals are tested; they can easily be placed back into their natural habitat, or be adopted by anyone willing to do so. However, the reality is entirely different from this misconception.

Although it is still not confirmed, some studies do show that animals have emotions and feelings. They can feel happiness and sorrow, health and pain. Therefore, testing potential products on animals such as rabbits and mice is a huge trial for them. Reports on the whole process of animal testing show that items are applied on such animals as needed to ensure that the chemicals in it do not produce a damaging effect to the skin and eyes and also to check if there is any side effect by long-term use. In the process however, a lot of animals upon whom testing is done, suffer pain, discomfort and at times, die because of the strength of the products being tested. Such cruelty brings forth a multitude of reactions by people who are aware of this issue. (Judson)

The first argument for those who do not pay heed to this issue is that it does not matter if animals are tested this way and are put in pain. This is rather a cold outlook towards the suffering of animal beings. There are several pros and cons to animal testing which various writers have put forth as the opinions of the general public.

The…… [Read More]

Bekoff, M. Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Greenwood Press: 1998. Print.

Carbone, Larry. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford University Press, 2004. Print.
View Full Essay

Animal Rights The Roles Of Essay

Words: 1285 Length: 4 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper #: 61408398

Two main aims of the zoos are highlighted by the author in the article. Firstly, zoos provide the environments that are suitable and represent some level of wilderness. Secondly, the zoos must provide entertainment to the visitors. But the zoos have been criticized by the author. One of the most important facts in these cases is the relationship between pornography and zoos as given by the authors. The way animals are represented in the zoos in the pictures has been very much compared with the sexual representation in pornography. From here, it can be realized that the animal representation is very offensive. Another important fact that has been highlighted by the author is that the zoos are failing to provide the correct education about the life of the animals. The main education that is now being provided by the zoos to the visitors is that the animals have been captivated for the entertainment of human beings. The animals that have been kept captive are to be understood in terms of their needs and requirements. The modern zoos do not certainly understand the needs that these animals have which are the main aim of the arguments given by the author in the article. One of the most important examples in these cases as given by the author is that of jaguar whose total required wild land equals ten times the land of the zoos where these jaguars are held captive (Acampora, 2005, p. 77).

Three important books and articles have been discussed in the previous sections with summaries with the help of which the main aims of the books and the article can be understood. The main aims of the highlighted readings are to highlight the rights of the animals. The first two books highlighted in the previous section is in relation to the animal testing, cosmetic making and how the foods being consumed by the human beings is at the cost of the sacrifice of the non-human animals. Some of the main facts that have been highlighted by Singer is…… [Read More]

Acampora, R. (2005). Zoos and Eyes: Contesting Captivity and Seeking Successor Practices. Society and Animals, 13, pp. 69-88(20).

Regan, T. (2000). Defending Animal Rights. University of Illinois Press.
View Full Essay

Testing On Animals Essay

Words: 1067 Length: 3 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper #: 14612638

animals for testing [...] why we should use animals for testing. It will include arguments on why using animals for testing is a widespread and scientifically sound practice. The use of animals in testing has been going on for thousands of years, and has led to some of the most significant and live saving medical breakthroughs on the planet. Medical testing using animals should certainly be humane, but should continue, as it saves lives and helps researchers discover life-saving technologies before testing on humans.


Using animals for scientific research is a highly controversial practice. Many highly visible animals rights groups, such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have sprung up over the years that decry the use of animals for testing under any circumstances. In the case of PETA, their animal rights activities often spill over into the questionable, as their recent ad campaign "Holocaust on Your Plate," which compared the killing of animals to the Holocaust in Nazi Germany during World War II. To many, this ad campaign was incredibly tasteless and offensive. It clearly illustrates how animal rights activists go over the top in their campaigns to save all animals. Using animals for testing has given the world many life-saving medicines and medical techniques, and very well may have saved many of those animal activists from deadly diseases and epidemics that went unchecked before animal testing yielded results.

PETA's case for ending all testing on animals is not realistic. The use of animals for medical research and testing has gone on for thousands of years, and has yielded many important results. For example, in 1726, scientist Stephen Hales measured the first blood pressure, not on a human, but on a horse. In 1881, famed scientist Louis Pasteur proved the "germ theory of disease by inoculating sheep against anthrax."

In 1885, Pasteur developed the rabies vaccine, and in 1964, "Dr. Michael DeBakey performs the first coronary bypass surgery using techniques perfected on animals."

These are only a few of the many life-saving scientific developments throughout the years that owe their origins to animal testing. Who…… [Read More]

View Full Essay

Animals For Research Because It Essay

Words: 1388 Length: 4 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper #: 18959856

In addition, the practice of testing cosmetics and other personal items on animals was accepted practice for many years. For example, countless rabbits were blinded to test the safety of mascaras and eye products (Carbone 24) before animal rights activists spoke up and asked the haunting question, "How many rabbits does Revlon blind for the sake of beauty?'" (Carbone 24). This use of animals for vanity seems unusually cruel and needless, and it seems there must be some other way to test new ideas, drugs, and treatments without wasting the lives of innocent animals.

Many scientists and health care professionals argue that medical research with animals is absolutely necessary to cure disease and make human life better and healthier. They maintain that animal research is absolutely necessary because in the end it saves human lives. Clearly, researchers have learned much from animal research, and have made great strides in science and medicine because of this research. DeGrazia notes "the advancement of basic biological knowledge -- proponents cite progress in the areas of Alzheimer's disease, AIDS, basic genetics, cancer, cardiovascular disease, haemophilia, malaria, organ transplantation, treatment of spinal cord injuries, and countless others" (DeGrazia 103). How many countless humans would have died from these diseases and afflictions if serious animal research had not been done?

This is one of the thorniest issues of the animal rights movement. When does the end justify the means? Often, as in the case of these serious diseases, it seems the end does justify the means. Numerous lives have been saved or made better because of the sacrifice of animals. However, the question remains. How much of this research could have been accomplished in some other way, without harming animals? As it has been shown, there are often other ways to accomplish even the most demanding research, and simply using animals may be the accepted practice because it has been done for so long, but it may not be the only way to accomplish complicated and necessary research.

Even those who do not agree with using animals for research and testing do admit that there are great gains from doing so. It seems there are two distinct areas where animal…… [Read More]

Carbone, Larry. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

DeGrazia, David. Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Other Topics In This Category: