(Dunne, 2012, pp. 116 -- 120) As a result, neo-liberalism is agreeing with neo-realism through various practices and institutions that are developed on the international level. In many cases, their contrasting functions are to enforce and support different standards that have been agreed to. However, they will also support specific policies and ideas that are embraced by the largest nation states. They will then impose these ideas on others to ensure that they are in compliance with the different guidelines. (Dunne, 2012, pp. 116 -- 120)

Explain the nature and significance of its areas of disagreement.

Inside the international structure, are major differences between the tactics utilized by the various non-governmental entities and their overall role in addressing critical challenges (i.e. The UN and the IMF). Under this philosophy, these institutions have the ability to help everyone to deal with critical differences and to provide a forum for discussing these challenges. (Dunne, 2012, pp. 122 -- 133)

When this happens, various disputes are effectively resolved and different actors can work together in order to prevent these problems from leading to hostilities. It is at this point that there will be more stability and respect for the most commonly accepted practices. The nature of this...

(Dunne, 2012, pp. 122 -- 133)
However, despite these views there are significant areas of disagreement. This is taking place in the area of neo-realism. In these kinds of situations, the different institutions are providing a framework for establishing various procedures and policies. Where they are contrasting from one another, is the way they are applied in a real world setting. (Dunne, 2012, pp. 122 -- 133)

In these kinds of situations, nation states will follow the ideas of neo-liberalism when it is in their own best interests. Yet, they will deviate from these polices when it is going directly against their larger objectives. In these cases, they will break their agreements or use these institutions to enforce their standards upon other states. These areas of disagreement will lead to conflicts about how international law is applied and the way these entities are utilized. This can create situations where everyone will think that they are serving the interests of powerful countries at the expense of weaker ones. This is significant, as it is demonstrating how neo-liberalism and neo-realism will often clash when these differences come into…