African Development Structural Adjustment Policies Research Paper

Excerpt from Research Paper :

(Shah, 2010)

F. Impact of Structural Adjustment Policy Preconditions

According to Shah the preconditions impact poorer countries in a devastating manner and it is reported that the following factors result in "further misery for the developing nations" and ultimately keep these countries dependent on nations that are developed: (1) Poor countries must export more in order to raise enough money to pay off their debts in a timely manner; (2) Because there are so many nations being asked or forced into the global market place -- before they are economically and socially stable and ready -- and told to concentrate on similar cash crops and commodities as others, the situation resembles a large-scale price war; (3) Then, the resources from the poorer regions become even cheaper, which favors consumers in the West; (4) Governments then need to increase exports just to keep their currencies stable (which may not be sustainable, either) and earn foreign exchange with which to help pay off debts. (Shah, 2010) Required in these cases is that governments: (1) spend less; (2) reduce consumption; 93) remove or decrease financial regulations. (Shah, 2010) The result is that over time: (1) the value of labor decreases; (2) capital flows become more volatile; (3) a spiraling race to the bottom then begins, which generates social unrest, which in turn leads to IMF riots and protests around the world. (Shah, 2010)

The work of the World Bank entitled "Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers" reports that the PRSPs are "one of the most tangible outcomes of the new approach to development defined in the Bank's Comprehensive Development Framework." (The World Bank, nd) It is reported that the World Bank ahs based its Country Assistance Strategies, its plans for assistance to countries that are low-income on PRSPs which are produced in alignment with five principles as follows: (1) They are country-driven, involving broad-based participation by civil society and the private sector as they are produced; (2) They are directed toward achieving results and focused on outcomes that would benefit the poor; (3) They recognize that tackling poverty requires a comprehensive approach because poverty is more than just a lack of income but that poor people also suffer from a lack of opportunity, security, and voice in decisions that affect their lives; (4) They are partnership-oriented in that they encourage the coordinated involvement of bi-lateral, multilateral and non-government organizations in the country's poverty reduction program; (5Z) They are based on a long-term perspective for poverty reduction. PRSPs foster greater openness in policymaking. Governments have sought increasingly to include traditionally marginalized groups, the private sector and civil society in developing them and because of this, poverty-reduction strategies developed through this process tend to have broader community and stakeholder support and are "owned" by the government. (The World Bank, nd) It is reported that these five principles include the following examples and specifics: (1) Country-driven: Country-ownership of a poverty reduction strategy is paramount. Broad-based participation of civil society in the adoption and monitoring of the poverty reduction strategy tailored to country circumstances will enhance its sustained implementation' (2) Results-oriented: (a) An understanding of the nature and determinants of poverty, and the public actions that can help reduce it, is required for the formulation of an effective strategy; and (b) Medium- and long-term goals for poverty reduction, including key outcome and intermediate indicators, are needed to ensure that policies are well designed, effectively implemented and carefully monitored' (3) Comprehensive: (a) Sustained poverty reduction will not be possible without rapid economic growth; macroeconomic stability, structural reforms and social stability are required to move countries to a higher path of sustainable growth; (b) Poverty is multidimensional; specific actions are needed to enable the poor to share in the benefits from growth, increase their capabilities and well being, and reduce their vulnerabilities to risks; and (c) A poverty reduction strategy should integrate institutional, structural and sectoral interventions into a consistent macroeconomic framework; (4) Partnerships: Government development of a strategy can provide the context for improved coordination of the work of the Bank and the Fund, as well as that of regional development banks and other multilaterals, bilateral assistance agencies, NGOs, academia, think tanks, and private sector organizations; and (5) Long-term Perspective: (a) A medium- and long-term perspective is needed, recognizing that poverty reduction will require institutional changes and capacity building -- including efforts to strengthen governance and accountability -- and is therefore a long-term process; and (b) National and international partners' willingness to make medium-term commitments will enhance the effectiveness of their support for a poverty reduction strategy. (International Monetary Fund, 1999)

It is reported that at the country-level the following differences exist: (1) the extent of commitment to poverty reductions and preparation of country-owned poverty reduction strategies; (2) the type of governments, their representative nature and their capacity to engage in participatory processes with civil society; (3) the extent to which civil societies exist, are representative and are active throughout low-income countries; (4) the existence of updated poverty assessments on which poverty reduction strategies can be based and knowledge about the nature and locus of poverty; and (5) the availability of good data on poverty, which could be used to measure poverty outcomes. (International Monetary Fund, 1999) The International Monetary Fund reports that a poverty reduction strategy should "ensure consistency between a country's macroeconomic, structural and social policies and the goals of poverty reduction and social development, and be produced in a way that involves transparency and broad-based participation in the choice of goals, the formulation of policies and the monitoring of implementation." (1999) The IMF reports that included in the PRSP would be the following typical characteristics: (1) Long-term goals for key poverty reduction targets and the macroeconomic, structural and institutional framework for achieving these, drawing on international and country-level experience; (2) Given the long lags -- both in reporting and in effects -- typically associated with poverty outcomes, and the need to ensure shorter-term monitoring of progress, these longer-term goals could be translated into annual (or six monthly) targets covering say a three-year horizon for related intermediate and proxy indicators. Thus, for example, a long-term goal for improving the literacy rate could be translated into annual (intermediate) targets covering, for example, the primary school enrollment rate; (3) The policy and institutional underpinnings for rapid sustained growth and poverty reduction -- including goals for poverty reduction, institutional and structural reforms, sectoral strategies and specific anti-poverty programs, and the associated domestic and external funding needs -- should all be integrated into a consistent macroeconomic framework over a minimum three-year horizon." (International Monetary Fund, 1999)

It is stated to be specifically critical that PRSPs work to "encourage and track country progress" in the following primary four areas: (1) the development of appropriate diagnostics that help national authorities understand better the major obstacles to poverty reduction and growth in the context of their own countries and the related identification and availability of good indicators of progress in poverty reduction; (2) the deepening of a shared vision across civil society regarding desired poverty reduction goals; (3) the setting of priorities and design of public actions to achieve desired poverty reduction outcomes; and (4) the development of participatory processes used for the setting of poverty reduction goals and the monitoring of implementation and progress. (International Monetary Fund, 1999)

Summary and Conclusion

It is clear that the PRSPs work in coordination with countries and appropriate authorities in gaining a better understanding of the barriers and obstacles to reduction of poverty. The Structural Adjustment Policies however, only served to make poor countries poorer in the adherence to rigid structural guidelines in the conduction of business in today's globalized economy.


Poulizouh, Thierry (2007) Chief of Staff Ministry of Economy, Planning and International Cooperation Central African Republic: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper -- Preparation Status Report. International Monetary Fund, Feb 2007, IMF Country Report No. 07-58. Central African Republic Ministry Of Economy, Planning And International Cooperation Office Of The Minister Steering Committee On The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Permanent Technical Secretariat Of The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper No. 3325/2006/MEPCI/DIRCAB/CP-CSLP/STP-CSLP Bangui, November 17, 2006.

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (1999) The World Bank, Projects and Operations. Online available at:,,contentMDK:20120705~menuPK:51557~pagePK:41367~piPK:51533~theSitePK:40941,00.html

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers -- Operational Issues (1999) Staffs of IMF and the World Bank. 10 Dec 1000. International Monetary Fund. Online available at:

Shah, Anup (2010) Structural Adjustment -- a Major Cause of Poverty. Global Issues. Online available at:

PRSP 2008-2010 Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Ministry of Economy, Planning and International Cooperation. Central African Republic. Analytical Summary. Online available at: ENG.pdf

G-24 Secretariat Briefing Paper (2003) on the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) approach (2003) March Online available…

Cite This Research Paper:

"African Development Structural Adjustment Policies" (2010, April 13) Retrieved December 17, 2017, from

"African Development Structural Adjustment Policies" 13 April 2010. Web.17 December. 2017. <>

"African Development Structural Adjustment Policies", 13 April 2010, Accessed.17 December. 2017,