Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
ASSIGNMENT
Assignment 1: Restorative Justice
Various arguments have been presented in the past, both for and against restorative justice. I am of the opinion that the relevance of restorative justice cannot be overstated in the contemporary criminal justice system. To begin with, it would be prudent to note that as Pavlacic, Kellum, and Schulenberg (2021) point out, traditionally, the standard focus in seeking to respond to various kinds of crimes and wrongdoing in the US has been retribution, i.e. by sending people to jail. As the authors further indicate, costs associated with this response have been prohibitive. More specifically, in the words of the authors, states incur incredible mass incarceration costs because of these ineffective practices (Pavlacic, Kellum, and Schulenberg, 2021, p. 2). Towards this end, the embrace of restorative justice practices would be an ideal way of reining in the unsustainable mass incarceration costs. Secondly, it should be noted that as Lloyd and Borrill (2020) indicate, various meta-analyses have clearly demonstrated that restorative justice practices do result in lower rates of reoffending. This is in comparison to the various other interventions deployed in the criminal justice system. This is a finding collaborated by yet another study on how effective restorative...…apportion greater focus on fully addressing the needs of the victim other than certain outcomes of the programs (i.e. offender rehabilitation).
In the final analysis, it should be noted that based on the findings of the discussion above, restorative justice would serve our countrys legal system best. This is more so the case given that it has been deemed more cost effective than punitive justice, i.e. in as far as the present cost of mass incarceration is concerned. Restorative justice would also help reduce the burden on the countrys criminal justice system as some restorative justice practices have been shown to result…
References
Choi, J. J., Bazemore, G., & Gilbert, M. J. (2012). Review of research on victims’ experiences in restorative justice: Implications for youth justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 35–42.
Lloyd, A. & Borrill, J. (2020). Examining the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice in Reducing Victims’ Post-Traumatic Stress. Psychological Injury and Law, 13, 77-89.
Pavlacic, J.M., Kellum, K.K. & Schulenberg, S.E. (2021). Advocating for the Use of Restorative Justice Practices: Examining the Overlap between Restorative Justice and Behavior Analysis. Behav Anal Pract., 25, 1-10.
Sherman, L.W., Strang, H., Wilson, E., Woods, D. & Ariel, B. (2015). Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 1-24.
Restorative Justice: With the research conducted between the years 1997 and 1998 in the United States and Europe shows that the rate of crime was high and the culprits were never given any chance to defend themselves whenever they appeared before the court of law. This made the courts to be full and the prisons to be overcrowded as criminals saw that there was no justice in their rulings. It is
Restorative Justice Individual restorative justice paper: Case study Traditionally, the debate about the purpose of the justice system has revolved around the question of whether punishment should be retributive or rehabilitative in nature. Those who favor a retributive model stress the need for criminals to pay their debts to society and view the purpose of the justice system as primarily to punish convicts through confinement and forcing them to work. Those who
Variations of the area court model, such as teen courts, medicine courts, and household physical violence courts, focus on specific concerns in order to establish even more extensive options. The underlying presumption of neighborhood courts is that neighborhoods are deeply damaged by the sentencing procedure yet are seldom spoken with and associated with judicial results. Correcting Community justice has actually been slowest to show up in the correctional industry. Maybe this
According to Richards (2004), however, the history of restorative justice outside of the specifically named restorative justice procedures that are littered throughout U.S. criminal justice history is difficult to determine. Although she cites work that suggests restorative justice has been around since the dawn of time, she argues that some histories are used as a means to convince others of the importance of restorative justice and, therefore, often exaggerate
However the law demands that the course of action should be experimented, and evaluated on the grounds that if they are reasonable, restorative, and respectful. The offenders should comply by the standards of safety, values, ethics, responsibility, accountability and civility. The offenders should be exposed to the same nature of crime experienced by the victims, and should be provided with the chance of learning empathy. Such an offender should
Restorative justice is a forward-looking, preventive response that strives to understand crime in its social context (Maiese, 2003). It examines the root causes of violence and crime to break these cycles of crime. This approach is based on the assumption that crime has its origins in social conditions, and recognizes that offenders themselves have often suffered harm. Therefore, offenders can tell their story of why the crime occurred and, just