Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Arnolfini Portrait
-How does the author identify symbolism? What symbols does he find the most evocative? Of the author's interpretations, which symbols do you find most plausible?
*Panofsky focuses on symbols which relate to the marriage sacrament:
*the joined hands of the couple
*the raised hand of the man
*the presence of a witness (van Eyck) who has signed his work accordingly
*the dog (as an image of marital fidelity)
*the religious icon of St. Margaret (invoked in childbirth)
*the room itself, with discarded shoes
*the single lit candle burning in the chandelier.
*Panofsky is interested in the way that the symbolism in the Arnolfini portrait disguises itself as realism: he identifies the result, for the viewer, as a "transfigured reality," where the transfiguration is perhaps indicative of the sacramental nature of what is depicted.
*Bedeaux never quotes the phrase "transfigured reality" but fixates...
ates instead on the notion of "disguised symbolism," which he thinks was a bad influence on subsequent scholarship.
*From the examples Bedeaux cites of scholars quibbling over minor issues in Panofsky's description -- such as whether the use of bride's left hand indicates a morganatic marriage, in which children born to the couple would not be considered legitimate heirs to the estate -- Bedaux seems correct that Panofsky's methods here are easily misapplied.
*Yet Bedaux then proceeds to locate symbolism in every object that Panofsky ignored -- the brush on the wall, the depiction of Christ on the mirror -- in a thoroughly-documented but not very persuasive set of syllogisms which links Christ's crucifixion to the institution of marriage, the wound on Christ's side to the sacrament of marriage, and mirrors to Christ.
-How is Panofsky's approach to art history different from what we have been doing in lecture and section? Is there something inherently attractive about approaching art history as…
If anything, the style of Akhenaton would tend to emphasize positive features, and perhaps even idealize the figure. The change in style may be attributed to Akhenaton's introduction of monotheism into Egypt. Ahten, the one God into which all other Egyptian deities were formed, was usually portrayed as a sun figure. In keeping with Ahten's supremacy and the tendency of Egyptian monarchs to affiliate them with the prevailing deity,
On viewing extensive amounts of Egyptian art, the similarities between the subjects and styles is somewhat astounding to a Western eye, which is more trained to notice the different signs of individual artists. It easily becomes clear that though the Egyptians saw aesthetic value in art and material things, most of the artwork they left behind -- especially in tombs and funerary chapels -- serve a much higher purpose
Moreover, this particular work displays some of the key characteristics of Isis. In addition to her magical powers, Isis represented for Egyptian culture the model of perfection for womanhood. This model, of course, includes the role of the woman as a mother, which is why it is vital that she is breast-feeding her newborn in this sculpture. It is also key to understand the fact that Horus was one of
The "Stela" was made around 1350 BCE, during the amarna period, and depicts Akhenaten, who initiated monotheism in Egypt, and his consort Nerfiti, in a limestone relief carving. The "Stela" represents the pharaoh and his family in a naturalistic manner that breaks from the traditional Egyptian stylization. The royal couple hold their three babies underneath the sun in a garden setting. The lines of the carving are more fluid, and
Ancient Egypt featured a wide variety of different pharaohs's. It is often a less well-known fact that these on occasion included a female pharaoh, such as Nefertari or Hatshepsut. The 18th Dynasty is no exception to this rule. It is interesting to see the extent of the importance of religion in lives of the kings and the people of the time. Often this is indicated by the art created to
Artists express feelings, thoughts, and images within their art. Sometimes they show more than that and paint their spirit on canvas. Spirituality was an important aspect of identity for many throughout the centuries and millennia. In modern times, artists like Georges Braque and Wassily Kandinsky wished to showcase the essence of the intangible by illustrating it through unique patterns and shapes. During the Renaissance period, and during the Baroque