Assessing Whether A Client Is Harmful To Self Or Others Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
712
Cite

Risk Assessment Checklist Identifying Basic Criteria Assessing Whether a Client Is Harmful to Self or Others In the U.S., suicide rate is relative to homicide rate, increasing at a yearly rate of fifty percent. One individual takes his/her life every sixteen minutes in the U.S., making the nation's average suicide rate 89 per day. Suicide has affected over 5 million individuals in the U.S. Of all suicide cases, 52% are performed using firearms kept at the victim's home. More than 90% of suicide victims usually suffer from major psychiatric ailments while taking their lives. Of these, substance abuse and mood disorders are most common. Knowledge of client history is imperative while evaluating self-harm risks among clients (Berman, n.d.).

Traumas can be defined as anxiety-creating objective events injurious to individuals' feelings of well-being (Herman, 1997). The individual must perceive an occurrence to be extremely threatening for any trauma to spark a crisis. Crises resulting from trauma are characterized by emotional and mental confusion triggered by a threat's perception (Berman, n.d.).

Alcohol/drug abuse, unprotected sex, drunk driving, smoking, gunplay or weapon involvement, involvement in criminal justice, known mental health or medical conditions, and other static factors ought to be taken into account. Also to be considered in the assessment of patient self-harm risks are static factors like history of violence or impulsivity, prior suicide attempts and self-mutilation behaviors predict behaviors. Prior involvement in activities of a high-risk nature, accessibility of lethal means, major medical/mental illness, impulsiveness, prior suicide attempts and history of violence all indicate increased likelihood...

...

A continuum should be used for evaluating all behaviors. Every behavioral change must be either reported or observed, by some third party, or by the patient him/herself (Berman, n.d.).
Checklist

Sr.

Statement

Yes

No

1.

Apparent use of alcohol/drugs

2.

Depression

3.

Anxiety

4.

Despondency

5.

Remorsefulness

6.

Agitation

7.

Anger

8.

Appetite Change

9.

Lethargy or sleeplessness

Professionals must be aware of the distinction between plans, ideation, and means. Ideation implies experiencing or thinking about killing or hurting oneself (Berman, n.d.). If the client answers "yes" in this regard, practitioners must explore the following:

Sr.

Statement

Yes

No

1.

Is the patient stating intent, talking about suicide, or making gestures or threats?

2.

Is he/she expressing innuendos -- (that is, suicidal statements like I wish to die or the world will be much better off if I'm gone)?

3.

Is he/she pre-occupied with the idea of dying and death?

4.

Is he/she fantasizing about suicide and its possible repercussions? (for adolescents)

5.

Is he/she trying to access means?

6.

Are thoughts of dying recurrent?

7.

Is the patient experiencing command hallucinations?

Plans refer to whether the patient has…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Berman, J. (n.d.). Assessing Client Risk for Self-Harm. CEU School.

Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books, 1997.


Cite this Document:

"Assessing Whether A Client Is Harmful To Self Or Others" (2016, May 09) Retrieved May 3, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/assessing-whether-a-client-is-harmful-to-2156686

"Assessing Whether A Client Is Harmful To Self Or Others" 09 May 2016. Web.3 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/assessing-whether-a-client-is-harmful-to-2156686>

"Assessing Whether A Client Is Harmful To Self Or Others", 09 May 2016, Accessed.3 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/assessing-whether-a-client-is-harmful-to-2156686

Related Documents
Ethics in Group Counseling
PAGES 15 WORDS 4405

Ethics in Group Counselling Ethics in Group Counseling Group Therapy Counselling: Ethics The ethical concerns of therapists have been getting larger in quantity and sophistication. Managed care demands professionals to think about problems with discretion as well as delivery associated with proficient treatment whilst other decisions might include informed consent, a variety of relationships together with customers, and ignoring discretion given clients' harmful conduct. These types of deliberations have been happening inside

This allows the client to place their level of behavior on the continuum and assess the levels of risk associated with their behaviors. The continuum also allows the client to assess the ways in which their behaviors over time, by examining the ways in which their behaviors are now different to past behaviors. This may allow clients to recognize that they have already made some progress toward less harmful

At one point or another in our lives, we are all beginners. We begin college, a first job, a first love affair, and perhaps a first dissertation project. We bring a great deal to these new situations, including our temperament, previous education, and family situations. Yet, as adults, we also learn. In romantic relationships, couples report having to learn how to interact successfully with their partners. College students routinely report

Figure 1 portrays three of the scenes 20/20 presented March 15, 2010. Figure 1: Heather, Rachel, and Unnamed Girl in 20/20 Program (adapted from Stossel, 2010). Statement of the Problem For any individual, the death of a family member, friend, parent or sibling may often be overwhelming. For adolescents, the death of person close to them may prove much more traumatic as it can disrupt adolescent development. Diana Mahoney (2008), with the

Often the client is unable to take steps to avoid the undesirable emotional attachment. The therapist must take the initiative in maintaining proper distance and personal space. However, it is important to be aware that a positive therapeutic relationship could become too much of a good thing. When it does, a positive relationship can become toxic to the therapeutic outcome. Comparing and Contrasting the Therapeutic Relationship and Client-Therapist Attachment The therapeutic

Bannister readily acknowledges that the creative group noticed that some children did not respond to the therapy in a way that showed it was a productive approach for those particular kids. The team's initial response was to reassess how they were interacting with those particular children. The final assessment the team made was that they, as an outside source, could not provide the complete or total stimuli for the