Atlas Shrugged and Ego

Roark and the Value-Creation Process Howard Roark feels that value creation and what it requires of the creators is crucially important from a moral perspective because of the value of Ego. Ego is the reason for Rand's hero, the reason for being.

It is a value based on Self-Actualization and it is ultimately the same concept that plays into the composer Richard Halley's sense of why he creates/composes music -- because he wants to exercise his mind and meet another individual who appreciates his creation in the same cerebral way: he produces the music and exchanges it for the mental appreciation that the discerning listener gives in return.

The reason that Howard Roark thinks that value-creation is crucial, morally speaking, is because he puts the Ego front and center as the moral purpose of life. One's Ego is the driving force of reality and to be false to the Ego is like to be false to the moral order in the universe -- it is like a moral crime.

Thus, for Howard Roark, who dynamites his building lest the vision he had for it be tainted by a lesser artist's work on it, his actions are morally correct because he judges them from the standpoint of the Ego. For Roark, the Ego is the moral arbiter and Roark acts out of a militant adherence to the moral law that his Ego represents. The Ego is the force which provides the vision, the artistic sight out of which is architecture emerges.

Changing the original vision, distorting the image, altering the architectural plans -- as happens with Roark's design at the end of the novel -- is like aborting a half-formed baby: it is murder in Roark's eyes. And to prevent the murder from occurring, he sabotages the would-be murderers and dynamites the structure.

Prior to this, Rand describes Roark as standing across the street from where the architectural adulterers are destroying his design -- she describes as standing like one who is before a firing squad -- as though in seeing his plan changed before his eyes, he were facing death. Thus, for Roark, value-creation is an act of life -- it is a moral act that constitutes life-giving.

If it is immoral to take life, it is immoral for the architects to destroy the life of his artistic vision -- and it is moral for him to fight back. What this process requires of the artist is a total commitment because, just as a baby must be born, the artist must go through the labor process before ultimately giving birth to the concept in real life.

The way that Halley puts it in Atlas Shrugged in "The Nature of the Artist Speech" is similar: Halley asserts that the "shining vision" of value-creation belongs not just to artists and authors but also to "men who discover how to use oil, how to run a mine, how to build an electric motor" -- in other words all men of industry who create something anew -- who add value to the world through their Ego's impulse to drive towards a vision that it presents to them in their minds (Rand).

In conclusion, there is no difference according to Rand in the way that a conductor approaches a symphony or.